On the public citation graph
The abundant-centre is not all that abundant: a comment to Osorio-Olvera et al. 2020
0 signed · 27 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00297.xopenalex-snapshot
The ‘abundant centre’ distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographical rule?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/284267openalex-snapshot
On the Relationship between Abundance and Distribution of Species
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0637openalex-snapshot
Ecological niche structure and rangewide abundance patterns of species
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12313openalex-snapshot
Geographic variation in genetic and demographic performance: new insights from an old biogeographical paradigm
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04027openalex-snapshot
Addressing common pitfalls does not provide more support to geographical and ecological abundant‐centre hypotheses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04442openalex-snapshot
On population abundance and niche structure
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05164openalex-snapshot
The influence of stochasticity, landscape structure and species traits on abundant–centre relationships
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12860openalex-snapshot
Species are not most abundant in the centre of their geographic range or climatic niche
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13396openalex-snapshot
Extensive mismatches between species distributions and performance and their relationship to functional traits
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13453openalex-snapshot
Relationships between population densities and niche‐centroid distances in North American birds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01094.xopenalex-snapshot
Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3897/rethinkingecology.3.24827openalex-snapshot
A comment on “Species are not most abundant in the centre of their geographic range or climatic niche”
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.05.434182openalex-snapshot
Accounting for dispersal improves the understanding of species abundance patterns
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05164openalex-snapshot
The influence of stochasticity, landscape structure and species traits on abundant–centre relationships
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13376openalex-snapshot
Using a robust multi‐settings inference framework on published datasets still reveals limited support for the abundant centre hypothesis: More testing needed on other datasets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13412openalex-snapshot
Accounting for dispersal using simulated data improves understanding of species abundance patterns
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v15i3.11989openalex-snapshot
Weighing the Evidence for the Abundant-Center Hypothesis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.12857v0.1/reviews/1openalex-snapshot
Peer Review #1 of "Spatial patterns in the contribution of biotic and abiotic factors to the population dynamics of three freshwater fish species (v0.1)"
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.12857v0.1/reviews/2openalex-snapshot
Peer Review #2 of "Spatial patterns in the contribution of biotic and abiotic factors to the population dynamics of three freshwater fish species (v0.1)"
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.12857v0.1/reviews/3openalex-snapshot
Peer Review #3 of "Spatial patterns in the contribution of biotic and abiotic factors to the population dynamics of three freshwater fish species (v0.1)"
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.12857v0.2/reviews/3openalex-snapshot
Peer Review #3 of "Spatial patterns in the contribution of biotic and abiotic factors to the population dynamics of three freshwater fish species (v0.2)"
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.14620v0.1/reviews/1openalex-snapshot
Peer Review #1 of "Mismatch between IUCN range maps and species interactions data illustrated using the Serengeti food web (v0.1)"
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.14620v0.2/reviews/1openalex-snapshot
Peer Review #1 of "Mismatch between IUCN range maps and species interactions data illustrated using the Serengeti food web (v0.2)"
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.14620v0.2/reviews/2openalex-snapshot
Peer Review #2 of "Mismatch between IUCN range maps and species interactions data illustrated using the Serengeti food web (v0.2)"
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12857openalex-snapshot
Spatial patterns in the contribution of biotic and abiotic factors to the population dynamics of three freshwater fish species
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14620openalex-snapshot
Mismatch between IUCN range maps and species interactions data illustrated using the Serengeti food web
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.