On the public citation graph
When can we trust population trends? Quantifying the effects of sampling interval and duration
0 signed · 44 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2openalex-snapshot
Modern Applied Statistics with S
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9278-7_5openalex-snapshot
Waterbirds as Bioindicators of Environmental Conditions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-015-0502-5openalex-snapshot
Large and irregular population fluctuations in migratory Pacific ( Calidris alpina pacifica ) and Atlantic ( C. a. hudsonica ) dunlins are driven by density‐dependence and climatic factors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.01.018openalex-snapshot
Identifying declines in waterbirds: The effects of missing data, population variability and count period on the interpretation of long-term survey data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.008openalex-snapshot
Long-term population declines in Afro-Palearctic migrant birds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.007openalex-snapshot
Is statistical power to detect trends a good assessment of population monitoring?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.007openalex-snapshot
Large mammal population declines in Africa’s protected areas
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.002openalex-snapshot
Planning for success: Identifying effective and efficient survey designs for monitoring
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.09.021openalex-snapshot
Temporal correlations in population trends: Conservation implications from time-series analysis of diverse animal taxa
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.087openalex-snapshot
Impacts of temporal revisit designs on the power to detect trend with a linear mixed model: An application to long-term monitoring of Sierra Nevada lakes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.016openalex-snapshot
Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.010openalex-snapshot
The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.007openalex-snapshot
Monitoring for conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.005openalex-snapshot
Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.016openalex-snapshot
Long-term datasets in biodiversity research and monitoring: assessing change in ecological communities through time
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.002openalex-snapshot
Monitoring does not always count
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02214-5openalex-snapshot
Classifying threatened species at national versus global levels
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25139openalex-snapshot
Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030489.xopenalex-snapshot
The Uses of Statistical Power in Conservation Biology: The Vaquita and Northern Spotted Owl
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96034.xopenalex-snapshot
Statistical Power Analysis and Amphibian Population Trends
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01250.xopenalex-snapshot
Using Decline in Bird Populations to Identify Needs for Conservation Action
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803825105openalex-snapshot
Populations of migratory bird species that did not show a phenological response to climate change are declining
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/122.1.338openalex-snapshot
ENHANCING THE SCIENTIFIC VALUE OF THE CHRISTMAS BIRD COUNT
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy144openalex-snapshot
Minimum Time Required to Detect Population Trends: The Need for Long-Term Monitoring Programs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2935openalex-snapshot
The false classification of extinction risk in noisy environments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1584openalex-snapshot
The Living Planet Index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12306openalex-snapshot
Power analysis for generalized linear mixed models in ecology and evolution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12356openalex-snapshot
Optimizing monitoring schemes to detect trends in abundance over broad scales
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01163.xopenalex-snapshot
Evaluating the power of monitoring plot designs for detecting long‐term trends in the numbers of common guillemots
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01715.xopenalex-snapshot
Making monitoring meaningful
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2004.00329.xopenalex-snapshot
Migrating shorebirds as integrative sentinels of global environmental change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00927.xopenalex-snapshot
Current Trends in Plant and Animal Population Monitoring
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01117.xopenalex-snapshot
Monitoring Change in Vertebrate Abundance: the Living Planet Index
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01671.xopenalex-snapshot
Variability in Population Abundance and the Classification of Extinction Risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01882.xopenalex-snapshot
Reliability of Indicators of Decline in Abundance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06370.xopenalex-snapshot
Monitoring temporal trends in spatially structured populations: how should sampling effort be allocated between space and time?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2006.00092.xopenalex-snapshot
LESSONS FROM MONITORING TRENDS IN ABUNDANCE OF MARINE MAMMALS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jofo.12007openalex-snapshot
Optimizing survey effort for burrow-nesting seabirds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132255openalex-snapshot
Combined Influences of Model Choice, Data Quality, and Data Quantity When Estimating Population Trends
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0246:mfprro]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
MONITORING FOR POLICY-RELEVANT REGIONALTRENDS OVER TIME
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0807:smpbme]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
Should Managed Populations Be Monitored Every Year?
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107096openalex-snapshot
Sampling requirements and approaches to detect ecosystem shifts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13499openalex-snapshot
Simple study designs in ecology produce inaccurate estimates of biodiversity responses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/f50301f1z8eeez4714z9fffz391cc3970650openalex-snapshot
Impact des changements globaux sur la dynamique de population des galliformes de montagne
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.