On the public citation graph
Contemporary Peer Review in Action: Lessons from Open Source Development
0 signed · 134 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_10openalex-snapshot
Agile Principles and Open Source Software Development: A Theoretical and Empirical Discussion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59412-0_34openalex-snapshot
A History of Software Inspections
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-1212(87)90025-2openalex-snapshot
Active design reviews: Principles and practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/32.825763openalex-snapshot
The effectiveness of software development technical reviews: a behaviorally motivated program of research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/csee.2001.913816openalex-snapshot
Integrating pair programming into a software development process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1368088.1368162openalex-snapshot
Open source software peer review practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/167049.167070openalex-snapshot
Does every inspection need a meeting?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1985793.1985867openalex-snapshot
Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/268411.268421openalex-snapshot
Understanding the sources of variation in software inspections
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/567793.567795openalex-snapshot
Two case studies of open source software development
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1825openalex-snapshot
Objective‐driven process appraisals: an educational experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14310-7_6openalex-snapshot
Towards an Agile Development Environment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35510-4_8openalex-snapshot
Code Reviews, Software Inspections, and Code Walkthroughs: Systematic Mapping Study of Research Topics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79474-3_9openalex-snapshot
A Comparative Study of Vectorization Approaches for Detecting Inconsistent Method Names
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-30044-7_23openalex-snapshot
Inner Source as Learning Infrastructure: A Qualitative Study of Developer Engagement and Organizational Barriers in a Safety-Critical R&D Environment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54978-1_77openalex-snapshot
On the Impact of Product Quality Attributes on Open Source Project Evolution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9452-6openalex-snapshot
Review participation in modern code review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-018-9646-1openalex-snapshot
The impact of human factors on the participation decision of reviewers in modern code review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-018-9676-8openalex-snapshot
Associating working memory capacity and code change ordering with code review performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09837-4openalex-snapshot
Do code review measures explain the incidence of post-release defects?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10053-xopenalex-snapshot
Developers perception of peer code review in research software development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-022-10167-wopenalex-snapshot
A mixed-methods analysis of micro-collaborative coding practices in OpenStack
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-022-10205-7openalex-snapshot
The evolution of the code during review: an investigation on review changes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10496-yopenalex-snapshot
Toward effective secure code reviews: an empirical study of security-related coding weaknesses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10560-7openalex-snapshot
A qualitative study on refactorings induced by code review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-017-1783-2openalex-snapshot
What Are They Talking About? Analyzing Code Reviews in Pull-Based Development Model
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-019-1917-9openalex-snapshot
Decomposing Composite Changes for Code Review and Regression Test Selection in Evolving Software
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-411519-4.00009-4openalex-snapshot
A Mixed Methods Approach to Mining Code Review Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/c2012-0-07289-4openalex-snapshot
The Art and Science of Analyzing Software Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswax.2020.100040openalex-snapshot
GIMO: A multi-objective anytime rule mining system to ease iterative feedback from domain experts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.05.038openalex-snapshot
The utility of complexity metrics during code reviews for CSE software projects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106637openalex-snapshot
Automatic patch linkage detection in code review using textual content and file location features
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106737openalex-snapshot
Towards a taxonomy of code review smells
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110806openalex-snapshot
Does code quality affect pull request acceptance? An empirical study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.110951openalex-snapshot
A systematic literature review and taxonomy of modern code review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111009openalex-snapshot
Can we benchmark Code Review studies? A systematic mapping study of methodology, dataset, and metric
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112101openalex-snapshot
Do code reviews lead to fewer code smells?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112288openalex-snapshot
Developer perceptions of modern code review processes in practice: Insights from a case study in a mid-sized company
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.05.054openalex-snapshot
Does every formal peer review really need to take place? An industrial case study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen.2020.0134openalex-snapshot
Code review effectiveness: an empirical study on selected factors influence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346005029openalex-snapshot
Effect of sustainability and ecological knowledge management on knowledge creation and team learning of MICE professional teachers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1536924openalex-snapshot
Developing a procedure for learning and assessing peer review in a forensic science programme
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae052openalex-snapshot
Code review in digital humanities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/apsec53868.2021.00055openalex-snapshot
Survey on Pains and Best Practices of Code Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ase.2019.00101openalex-snapshot
CoRA: Decomposing and Describing Tangled Code Changes for Reviewer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/compsac.2017.153openalex-snapshot
Interactively Decomposing Composite Changes to Support Code Review and Regression Testing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icbc59979.2024.10634376openalex-snapshot
DecentPeeR: A Self-Incentivised & Inclusive Decentralized Peer Review System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icse-seip58684.2023.00020openalex-snapshot
Using Large-scale Heterogeneous Graph Representation Learning for Code Review Recommendations at Microsoft
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icse.2013.6606617openalex-snapshot
Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icse.2015.35openalex-snapshot
Helping Developers Help Themselves: Automatic Decomposition of Code Review Changesets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icse.2019.00110openalex-snapshot
Test-Driven Code Review: An Empirical Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icse.2019.00111openalex-snapshot
Why Does Code Review Work for Open Source Software Communities?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icse48619.2023.00108openalex-snapshot
Code Review of Build System Specifications: Prevalence, Purposes, Patterns, and Perceptions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icsme46990.2020.00055openalex-snapshot
How Does Modern Code Review Impact Software Design Degradation? An In-depth Empirical Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icst.2017.27openalex-snapshot
Broadcast vs. Unicast Review Technology: Does It Matter?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/itmc.2014.6918619openalex-snapshot
Managing the lifecycle of IEEE's Humanitarian Technology with peer-review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/melecon53508.2022.9843030openalex-snapshot
Intelligent Biofeedback Comprehension Assessment: Theory, Research, and Tools
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2013.95openalex-snapshot
Understanding How Companies Interact with Free Software Communities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2015.55openalex-snapshot
Why and How Should Open Source Projects Adopt Time-Based Releases?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2017.265100500openalex-snapshot
Code Reviewing in the Trenches: Challenges and Best Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2018.290101357openalex-snapshot
Software Development Analytics for Xen: Why and How
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2021.3073045openalex-snapshot
Reproducible Builds: Increasing the Integrity of Software Supply Chains
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/msr.2015.21openalex-snapshot
Characteristics of Useful Code Reviews: An Empirical Study at Microsoft
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/msr.2015.25openalex-snapshot
Lessons Learned from Building and Deploying a Code Review Analytics Platform
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/msr.2017.17openalex-snapshot
Predicting Usefulness of Code Review Comments Using Textual Features and Developer Experience
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/msr.2017.39openalex-snapshot
Impact of Continuous Integration on Code Reviews
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/qrs51102.2020.00069openalex-snapshot
Is There A "Golden" Rule for Code Reviewer Recommendation? : —An Experimental Evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/quatic.2016.029openalex-snapshot
Agility and Quality Attributes in Open Source Software Projects Release Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/saner.2016.105openalex-snapshot
Analyzing the State of Static Analysis: A Large-Scale Evaluation in Open Source Software
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/scam.2016.30openalex-snapshot
A Security Perspective on Code Review: The Case of Chromium
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/secon.2014.6950664openalex-snapshot
Investigating the impact of peer code review and pair programming on test-driven development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/siie.2017.8259643openalex-snapshot
An experimental evaluation of peer testing in the context of the teaching of software testing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2015.2500238openalex-snapshot
Automatically Recommending Peer Reviewers in Modern Code Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2016.2576451openalex-snapshot
Process Aspects and Social Dynamics of Contemporary Code Review: Insights from Open Source Development and Industrial Practice at Microsoft
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2017.2756043openalex-snapshot
A Study of Social Interactions in Open Source Component Use
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2018.2868367openalex-snapshot
Does Reviewer Recommendation Help Developers?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2024.3366753openalex-snapshot
Factoring Expertise, Workload, and Turnover Into Code Review Recommendation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2491411.2491444openalex-snapshot
Convergent contemporary software peer review practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2533685openalex-snapshot
Key factors for adopting inner source
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2568225.2568322openalex-snapshot
How do centralized and distributed version control systems impact software changes?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2593882.2593887openalex-snapshot
The (R) Evolution of social media in software engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2594458openalex-snapshot
Peer Review on Open-Source Software Projects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2745802.2747957openalex-snapshot
Selecting research methods for studying a participatory culture in software development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2889160.2889191openalex-snapshot
Teaching code review management using branch based workflows
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2950290.2950323openalex-snapshot
Factors influencing code review processes in industry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2950290.2983929openalex-snapshot
Visualizing code and coverage changes for code review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2970276.2970283openalex-snapshot
CORRECT: code reviewer recommendation at GitHub for Vendasta technologies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3084226.3084247openalex-snapshot
Using Metrics to Track Code Review Performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3127005.3127014openalex-snapshot
A Large-Scale Study of Modern Code Review and Security in Open Source Projects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3180155.3180192openalex-snapshot
When testing meets code review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3236024.3236080openalex-snapshot
What makes a code change easier to review: an empirical investigation on code change reviewability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3301326.3301380openalex-snapshot
Finding Impact Factors for Rejection of Pull Requests on GitHub
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3338906.3340449openalex-snapshot
WhoDo: automating reviewer suggestions at scale
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3377811.3380335openalex-snapshot
Mitigating turnover with code review recommendation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3377811.3380413openalex-snapshot
Is rust used safely by software developers?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3468264.3473099openalex-snapshot
Unveiling multiple facets of design degradation in modern code review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3475716.3475785openalex-snapshot
An Empirical Study on Refactoring-Inducing Pull Requests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3508484.3508490openalex-snapshot
Enhancing Hybrid OSS Development Through Agile Methods and High Media Synchronicity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3540250.3558945openalex-snapshot
Understanding why we cannot model how long a code review will take: an industrial case study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3555228.3555244openalex-snapshot
A characterization study of testing contributors and their contributions in open source projects.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3585004openalex-snapshot
Modern Code Reviews—Survey of Literature and Practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3664646.3665664openalex-snapshot
AI-Assisted Assessment of Coding Practices in Modern Code Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3691620.3694996openalex-snapshot
Detect Hidden Dependency to Untangle Commits
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3718739openalex-snapshot
PATCH : Empowering Large Language Model with Programmer-Intent Guidance and Collaborative-Behavior Simulation for Automatic Bug Fixing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3728931openalex-snapshot
Understanding Practitioners’ Expectations on Clear Code Review Comments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3744916.3787773openalex-snapshot
Atomizer: An LLM-based Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Intent-Driven Commit Untangling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3793302.3793611openalex-snapshot
Why Are AI Agent–Involved Pull Requests (Fix-Related) Remain Unmerged? An Empirical Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3794763.3794806openalex-snapshot
Put The “Code” Back in “Code Comprehension Study”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3832783.3837417openalex-snapshot
Recovering Revisions of Pull Requests with Altered History
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17771/pucrio.acad.32716openalex-snapshot
TO COLLABORATE OR NOT TO COLLABORATE?: IMPROVING THE IDENTIFICATION OF CODE SMELLS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2015.007openalex-snapshot
A web-based environmental decision support system for legacy models
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2020.195openalex-snapshot
Establishing an Extendable Benchmarking Framework for E-Fulfillment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26226/morressier.613b5419842293c031b5b639openalex-snapshot
A systematic literature review and taxonomy of modern code review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/info8030109openalex-snapshot
Frequent Releases in Open Source Software: A Systematic Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1812.09746openalex-snapshot
A Multi-Objective Anytime Rule Mining System to Ease Iterative Feedback from Domain Experts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5555/2486788.2486882openalex-snapshot
Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5555/2818754.2818773openalex-snapshot
Helping developers help themselves: automatic decomposition of code review changesets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5555/2820518.2820538openalex-snapshot
Characteristics of useful code reviews: an empirical study at Microsoft
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5555/2820518.2820542openalex-snapshot
Lessons learned from building and deploying a code review analytics platform
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/9c17a005z4d83z40cfzb648z2fbd363e66b4openalex-snapshot
Supporting software integration activities with first-class code changes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2163v1openalex-snapshot
Structured unit testable templated code for efficient code review process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.193openalex-snapshot
The effects of change decomposition on code review—a controlled experiment
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.