On the public citation graph
Testing evolutionary hypotheses: from Willi Hennig to Angiosperm Phylogeny Group
0 signed · 44 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511819049.008openalex-snapshot
Phylogenetic inference using maximum likelihood methods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511819049.009openalex-snapshot
Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using MRBAYES
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.xopenalex-snapshot
An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/317578openalex-snapshot
Morphological Phylogenetic Analysis of Basal Angiosperms: Comparison and Combination with Molecular Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl128openalex-snapshot
Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: contrasting the 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' approaches used to infer the likely characteristics of the first flowers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/38.1.7openalex-snapshot
A Concern for Evidence and a Phylogenetic Hypothesis of Relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12026openalex-snapshot
Why phylogeneticists should care less about P opper's falsificationism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00517.xopenalex-snapshot
CONFOUNDING ASYMMETRIES IN EVOLUTIONARY DIVERSIFICATION AND CHARACTER CHANGE
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00847.xopenalex-snapshot
The performance of morphological characters in broad-scale phylogenetic analyses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.xopenalex-snapshot
An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1985.tb00421.xopenalex-snapshot
CONSENSUS CLADOGRAMS AND GENERAL CLASSIFICATIONS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00169.xopenalex-snapshot
The unfalsifiability of cladograms and its consequences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2009.00496.xopenalex-snapshot
Are molecular data supplanting morphological data in modern phylogenetic studies?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00829.xopenalex-snapshot
Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.10.010165.000525openalex-snapshot
Phylogenetic Systematics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.19.1.4openalex-snapshot
APG III: Bibliographical Information and Synonymy of Magnoliidae
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-6-1openalex-snapshot
Integrated taxonomy: traditional approach and DNA barcoding for the identification of filarioid worms and related parasites (Nematoda)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-6-12openalex-snapshot
Phylogenetic support values are not necessarily informative: the case of the Serialia hypothesis (a mollusk phylogeny)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2399899openalex-snapshot
Integration of Morphological and Ribosomal RNA Data on the Origin of Angiosperms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2992015openalex-snapshot
An Ordinal Classification for the Families of Flowering Plants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2992432openalex-snapshot
A Concern for Evidence and a Phylogenetic Hypothesis of Relationships Among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3374/014.053.0101openalex-snapshot
Assembling the Squamate Tree of Life: Perspectives from the Phenotype and the Fossil Record
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-4406openalex-snapshot
Biological systematics: principles and applications
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5497.4.2zenodo-depositor-declared
The monophyly of Magelona F. Müller, 1858 (Polychaeta, Magelonidae): Comments on Meißner et al.’s (2023) reinstatement of Octomagelona Aguirrezabalaga, Ceberio & Fiege, 2001
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1573-3openalex-snapshot
Revisiting the Darwinian shortfall in biodiversity conservation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-016-9381-8openalex-snapshot
Phylogenetic Hypotheses: Neither Testable Nor Falsifiable
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-016-0274-6openalex-snapshot
Dispelling five myths about hypothesis testing in biological systematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316338797.011openalex-snapshot
Semaphoronts: the elements of biological systematics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514280112openalex-snapshot
Water from the rock: Ancient aquatic angiosperms flow from the fossil record
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2017.1279693openalex-snapshot
The jazz of cladistics*
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcad147openalex-snapshot
Pollination syndromes and the origins of floral traits
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12133openalex-snapshot
Ernst Mayr, causal understanding, and systematics: an example using sabelliform polychaetes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/d18070433openalex-snapshot
Phylogenetic Inference via Ancestral State Reconstruction/Character Mapping Is Logically Unsound Abductive Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.11993v0.1/reviews/1openalex-snapshot
Peer Review #1 of "Who’s who in Magelona: phylogenetic hypotheses under Magelonidae Cunningham & Ramage, 1888 (Annelida: Polychaeta) (v0.1)"
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.11993v0.1/reviews/2openalex-snapshot
Peer Review #2 of "Who’s who in Magelona: phylogenetic hypotheses under Magelonidae Cunningham & Ramage, 1888 (Annelida: Polychaeta) (v0.1)"
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.11993v0.1/reviews/3openalex-snapshot
Peer Review #3 of "Who’s who in Magelona: phylogenetic hypotheses under Magelonidae Cunningham & Ramage, 1888 (Annelida: Polychaeta) (v0.1)"
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11993openalex-snapshot
Who’s who in Magelona: phylogenetic hypotheses under Magelonidae Cunningham & Ramage, 1888 (Annelida: Polychaeta)
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.