On the public citation graph
Scale‐dependent foraging tradeoff allows competitive coexistence
0 signed · 60 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.2000.1486openalex-snapshot
General Theory of Competitive Coexistence in Spatially-Varying Environments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00395696openalex-snapshot
Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1985-yopenalex-snapshot
Exploitative competition alters bee foraging and flower choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-010-0328-xopenalex-snapshot
Classical and resource-based competition: a unifying graphical approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0321-zopenalex-snapshot
Using behavioural and state variables to identify proximate causes of population change in a seabird
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-2931-9openalex-snapshot
A model for habitat selection and species distribution derived from central place foraging theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.12.018openalex-snapshot
Land use intensity and landscape complexity—Analysis of landscape characteristics in an agricultural region in Southern Sweden
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.009openalex-snapshot
Modeling pollinating bee visitation rates in heterogeneous landscapes from foraging theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2008.04.005openalex-snapshot
A guide to central place effects in foraging
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.1999.00220.xopenalex-snapshot
Niche differentiation in nectar‐collecting stingless bees: the influence of morphology, floral choice and interference competition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00143.xopenalex-snapshot
On the relationship between niche and distribution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00216.xopenalex-snapshot
Foraging trade‐offs and resource patchiness: theory and experiments with a freshwater snail community
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00530.xopenalex-snapshot
Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208682110openalex-snapshot
Resource diversity and landscape-level homogeneity drive native bee foraging
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.68.6.1246openalex-snapshot
Regional Coexistence of Species and Competition between Rare Species
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/282505openalex-snapshot
The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/283537openalex-snapshot
Generality of the Size-Distance Relation in Models of Optimal Feeding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/303199openalex-snapshot
Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short Dispersal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/303297openalex-snapshot
Evolutionarily Stable Strategies for Consuming a Structured Resource
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/303316openalex-snapshot
Grazers and Diggers: Exploitation Competition and Coexistence among Foragers with Different Feeding Strategies on a Single Resource
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/679066openalex-snapshot
A Graphical-Mechanistic Approach to Spatial Resource Competition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1117openalex-snapshot
Population growth rate and its determinants: an overview
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1122openalex-snapshot
Two complementary paradigms for analysing population dynamics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12664openalex-snapshot
Niche partitioning due to adaptive foraging reverses effects of nestedness and connectance on pollination network stability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00801.xopenalex-snapshot
Foraging trip duration of bumblebees in relation to landscape‐wide resource availability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00216.xopenalex-snapshot
Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes ‐ eight hypotheses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419openalex-snapshot
Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.001433openalex-snapshot
ENVIRONMENTAL HETEROGENEITY AND THE COEXISTENCE OF DESERT RODENTS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2358:cfbaco]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
COMPLEMENTARY FORAGING BEHAVIORS ALLOW COEXISTENCE OF TWO CONSUMERS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2498:lcameo]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
LANDSCAPE COMPLEMENTATION AND METAPOPULATION EFFECTS ON LEOPARD FROG POPULATIONS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0136openalex-snapshot
LINKING BEES AND FLOWERS: HOW DO FLORAL COMMUNITIES STRUCTURE POLLINATOR COMMUNITIES?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1936866openalex-snapshot
Competition, Foraging Energetics, and the Cost of Sociality in Three Species of Bees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1938769openalex-snapshot
Resource Partitioning in Bumblebees: Experimental Studies of Foraging Behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2463617openalex-snapshot
Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short Dispersal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3078947openalex-snapshot
Grazers and Diggers: Exploitation Competition and Coexistence among Foragers with Different Feeding Strategies on a Single Resource
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3079018openalex-snapshot
Evolutionarily Stable Strategies for Consuming a Structured Resource
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3544643openalex-snapshot
Resource Partitioning in Bumblebees: The Significance of Differences in Proboscis Length
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3544901openalex-snapshot
Ecological Processes That Affect Populations in Complex Landscapes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3354/meps06873openalex-snapshot
Provisioning strategies of Antarctic fur seals and chinstrap penguins produce different responses to distribution of common prey and habitat
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4833158openalex-extracted
Consequences of Intraspecific Competition for Floral Resources in Heterogeneous Landscapes for Eusocial Bees
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109249openalex-snapshot
Effects of crop and non-crop resources and competition: High importance of trees and oilseed rape for solitary bee reproduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110094openalex-snapshot
Designing crop pollination services: A spatially explicit agent-based model for real agricultural landscapes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110844openalex-snapshot
Consequences of intraspecific competition for floral resources in heterogeneous landscapes for eusocial bees
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-01990-5openalex-snapshot
Ecological traits interact with landscape context to determine bees’ pesticide risk
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125901006openalex-snapshot
Implications of Pollinator Biodiversity Decline for Food Security, Economy, and Pollinator Conservation Policies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2411780121openalex-snapshot
Central place foragers, prey depletion halos, and how behavioral niche partitioning promotes consumer coexistence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2419275122openalex-snapshot
Resource-use plasticity governs the causal relationship between traits and community structure in model microbial communities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arab143openalex-snapshot
Optimal distributions of central-place foragers: honey bee foraging in a mass flowering crop
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13333openalex-snapshot
Flowering resources distract pollinators from crops: Model predictions from landscape simulations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.13090openalex-snapshot
The value of spatial experience and group size for ant colonies in direct competition
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13026openalex-snapshot
Evolutionary plant–pollinator responses to anthropogenic land‐use change: impacts on ecosystem services
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13040openalex-snapshot
Pollinator‐mediated effects of landscape‐scale land use on grassland plant community composition and ecosystem functioning – seven hypotheses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13109openalex-snapshot
Models of bee responses to land use and land cover changes in agricultural landscapes – a review and research agenda
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.06651openalex-snapshot
Pollinator competition and the structure of floral resources
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2024-0417openalex-snapshot
How to feed a fish: application of giving-up density theory to aquatic systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-022-00285-zopenalex-snapshot
Scheimpflug lidar range profiling of bee activity patterns and spatial distributions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.697618openalex-snapshot
Coexistence of “Cream Skimmer” and “Crumb Picker” Phenotypes in Nature and in Cancer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/land12020362openalex-snapshot
Local and Landscape Factors Influence Plant-Pollinator Networks and Bee Foraging Behavior across an Urban Corridor
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.