On the public citation graph
Conceptual engineering: A road map to practice
0 signed · 237 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05308-0_3openalex-snapshot
Norms and Beliefs: How Change Occurs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9648-3openalex-snapshot
X-Phi and Carnapian Explication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9791-5openalex-snapshot
Explication as a Method of Conceptual Re-engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00221-8openalex-snapshot
Explicating ‘Explication’ via Conceptual Spaces
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00223-6openalex-snapshot
What Ought a Fruitful Explicatum to be?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00441-6openalex-snapshot
What is a Conspiracy Theory?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00447-0openalex-snapshot
Which Concept of Concept for Conceptual Engineering?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01416-zopenalex-snapshot
Speaker’s reference, stipulation, and a dilemma for conceptual engineers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01546-4openalex-snapshot
There is no dilemma for conceptual engineering. Reply to Max Deutsch
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01619-yopenalex-snapshot
Still the same dilemma for conceptual engineers: reply to Koch
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1615-5openalex-snapshot
The constituents of an explication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02007-6openalex-snapshot
The externalist challenge to conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02096-xopenalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineering, truth, and efficacy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02815-9openalex-snapshot
Content internalism and conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02868-wopenalex-snapshot
Engineering what? On concepts in conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03365-4openalex-snapshot
Commitment engineering: conceptual engineering without representations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03563-8openalex-snapshot
Meaning change and changing meaning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00367-xopenalex-snapshot
What Should Conceptual Engineering Be All About?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0340-9openalex-snapshot
Why Philosophers Shouldn’t Do Semantics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2022.22openalex-snapshot
Epistemic Paternalism via Conceptual Engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.5openalex-snapshot
The Role of Concepts in Fixing Language
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511487132openalex-snapshot
Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2019.1567381openalex-snapshot
Carnapian explications, experimental philosophy, and fruitful concepts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2019.1667870openalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineering via experimental philosophy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2019.1675534openalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineers shouldn’t worry about semantic externalism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1719881openalex-snapshot
How to conceptually engineer conceptual engineering?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1773309openalex-snapshot
Conceptual control: on the feasibility of conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1805708openalex-snapshot
Truth and objectivity in conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1809514openalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineering and the implementation problem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1817141openalex-snapshot
What is conceptual engineering and what should it be?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1850339openalex-snapshot
Fully experimental conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1850342openalex-snapshot
Taking control: conceptual engineering without (much) metasemantics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1853342openalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineering, speaker-meaning and philosophy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1853343openalex-snapshot
Trivializing Conceptual Engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2020.1860122openalex-snapshot
Carnap meets Foucault: conceptual engineering and genealogical investigations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2021.1887758openalex-snapshot
Post-truth conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2021.1926316openalex-snapshot
Concepts and conceptual engineering: answering Cappelen's challenge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2021.1956368openalex-snapshot
Engineering concepts by engineering social norms: solving the implementation challenge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2021.1967190openalex-snapshot
A new challenge to conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2021.1983457openalex-snapshot
On pluralism and conceptual engineering: introduction and overview
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2021.1986424openalex-snapshot
Concept pluralism in conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2021.2000118openalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineering: when do we need it? How can we do it?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2022.2028230openalex-snapshot
Foundational issues in conceptual engineering: Introduction and overview
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2022.2062045openalex-snapshot
Inferentialist conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2022.2075454openalex-snapshot
Towards an ethics of conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306880.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Doing without Concepts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712053.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Living Words: Meaning Underdetermination and the Dynamic Lexicon
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653850.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Replacing Truth
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892631.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzz069openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering, Metasemantic Externalism and Speaker-Meaning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0012openalex-snapshot
Going On, Not in the Same Way
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0017openalex-snapshot
The A-project and the B-project
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0019openalex-snapshot
Philosophy as the Study of Defective Concepts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0021openalex-snapshot
A Pragmatic Method for Normative Conceptual Work
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803331.003.0013openalex-snapshot
How Not to Change the Subject
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198803331.003.0014openalex-snapshot
Amelioration vs Perversion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198807520.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833635.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqab023openalex-snapshot
Agency, Power, and Injustice in Metalinguistic Disagreement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00201openalex-snapshot
Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01693.xopenalex-snapshot
A DEFENCE OF CONSTRUCTIONISM: PHILOSOPHY AS CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01376.xopenalex-snapshot
The Vernacular Concept of Innateness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00127.xopenalex-snapshot
Modality, Normativity, and Intentionality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12394openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering and the Politics of Implementation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12843openalex-snapshot
Classification procedures as the targets of conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12164openalex-snapshot
Does Experimental Philosophy Have a Role to Play in Carnapian Explication?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12265openalex-snapshot
On the relation between conceptual engineering and conceptual ethics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12311openalex-snapshot
Broad‐spectrum conceptual engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.13169/intecritdivestud.4.1.0010openalex-snapshot
Philosophy of Disability, Conceptual Engineering, and the Nursing Home-Industrial-Complex in Canada
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2979/hyp.2005.20.4.10openalex-snapshot
What Are We Talking About? The Semantics and Politics of Social Kinds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3196/004433007782418090openalex-snapshot
Regeln für das korrekte Explizieren von Begriffen
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003164869-3openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering in Philosophy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-0862openalex-snapshot
Dear Carnap, dear Van: the Quine-Carnap correspondence and related work
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-3847openalex-snapshot
Think: a compelling introduction to philosophy
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4683151openalex-extracted
(Re)Conceptualizations: Intentional Concept Development in the Social Sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.893openalex-snapshot
Climate concepts for supporting political goals of mitigation and adaptation: The case for “climate crisis”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62241-0_19openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering Health: A Historical-Philosophical Analysis of the Concept of Positive Health
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81865-3_1openalex-snapshot
The Toolkit of Public Ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-90414-1_2openalex-snapshot
Health Concepts in Medicine
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98520-1_1openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Analysis: Historical and Conceptual Connections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98520-1_2openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Revision Without Changing the Subject: A Haslangerian Account
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98520-1_4openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering, Implementation, and Metalinguistic Awareness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98520-1_5openalex-snapshot
Kinds of Kinds: Normativity, Scope and Implementation in Conceptual Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98524-9_7openalex-snapshot
Engineering Ideologically Defective Concepts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98524-9_8openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering: Rethinking “Race”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98535-5_1openalex-snapshot
How Language Teaches and Misleads: “Coronavirus” and “Social Distancing” as Case Studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98535-5_2openalex-snapshot
Psychiatric Kinds and the DSM: Notes from a Conceptual Building Site
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98535-5_4openalex-snapshot
Rethinking the Ocean: Conceptual Engineering for the Next 10,000 Years
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98535-5_5openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering, Semantic Tolerance and Flexibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98535-5_6openalex-snapshot
Labeling Unlabeled Identities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98535-5_7openalex-snapshot
Conspiracy Theories Are Not Theories: Time To Rename Conspiracy Theories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-69683-5_69-1openalex-snapshot
Themen metaphilosophischer Forschung: Conceptual Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-024-09726-1openalex-snapshot
Value Magnetism: Why Conceptual Engineering Requires Objective Values
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-025-00923-xopenalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering Should be Empirical
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-025-00933-9openalex-snapshot
How to Conceptual Engineer ‘Entropy’ and ‘Information’
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-025-00957-1openalex-snapshot
Forward-Looking Concept Functions and the Function/Accident Distinction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-026-01138-4openalex-snapshot
Carnapian Explication and the Social Sciences: A Pragmatic Model of Conceptual Replacement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09774-6openalex-snapshot
Engineering the trust machine. Aligning the concept of trust in the context of blockchain applications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09804-3openalex-snapshot
Socially Disruptive Technologies and Conceptual Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09823-8openalex-snapshot
What responsibility gaps are and what they should be
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-024-10459-8openalex-snapshot
Impactful Conceptual Engineering: Designing Technological Artefacts Ethically
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-026-00562-5openalex-snapshot
Responsive Equanimity to Uncertainty: Towards the Construction of a Concept for Handling Medical Uncertainty in Clinical Practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-024-09939-9openalex-snapshot
Biomimicry and AI-Enabled Automation in Agriculture. Conceptual Engineering for Responsible Innovation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-025-09724-wopenalex-snapshot
Complementing Science: Lessons from the History and Philosophy of Thermal Physics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-026-09749-2openalex-snapshot
An inability-based account of psychiatric harm
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-025-10279-2openalex-snapshot
The role of clinicians in the looping effect: epistemic injustices and looping breaks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-026-10397-5openalex-snapshot
On the tetrad of human malady: disease, illness, sickness, and existential suffering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02273-wopenalex-snapshot
Bias, machine learning, and conceptual engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-025-02399-5openalex-snapshot
Reshaping values for your own good: subjectivity and objectivity in well-being
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-026-02524-yopenalex-snapshot
Diving for pearls: conceptual abandonment, conceptual engineering, and the limits of thought and language
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04059-9openalex-snapshot
Framed and framing inquiry: a pragmatist proposal
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04625-9openalex-snapshot
The power of social norms: Why conceptual engineers should care about implementation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04661-5openalex-snapshot
Having a concept has a cost
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04685-xopenalex-snapshot
To reform or to eliminate an attractor?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04850-2openalex-snapshot
Good classification matters: conceptual engineering in data science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04885-5openalex-snapshot
What attitude should we take to conceptual engineering?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05175-4openalex-snapshot
Proper foundations for conceptual ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05231-zopenalex-snapshot
Conceptual ethics and the ethics of implementation: case for divorce?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05263-5openalex-snapshot
Unpacking conceptual function as tool function
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05353-4openalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineering, non-conceptual content, and the need for better experiences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05510-3openalex-snapshot
Fixing foundational concepts in machine learning: a methodological primer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05659-xopenalex-snapshot
From words to propositions: rethinking meaning construction in conceptual engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10111-1openalex-snapshot
Logical Organization of Philosophical Concepts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10115-xopenalex-snapshot
Engineering Disputed Concepts and the Meeting of Minds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10143-7openalex-snapshot
Arguing with Engineered Concepts. An Introduction to Conceptual Engineering and the Strategies of Definition
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-025-10227-yopenalex-snapshot
Rejection as a Ground of Our Obedience to the Rules of Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-024-00619-xopenalex-snapshot
Computational Approaches to Concepts Representation: A Whirlwind Tour
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-025-00769-wopenalex-snapshot
Conceptual Revision in Action
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-026-00836-wopenalex-snapshot
Composite Modes of Presentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00664-1openalex-snapshot
Making Trust Safe for AI? Non-agential Trust as a Conceptual Engineering Problem
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00670-3openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering and Philosophy of Technology: Amelioration or Adaptation?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-026-01045-0openalex-snapshot
Conceptualising conceptual resilience. A comparative approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-025-00693-3openalex-snapshot
The Apgar score and race: why healthy babies are supposed to be “pink”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00295-4openalex-snapshot
If conceptual engineering is a new method in the ethics of AI, what method is it exactly?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-024-00151-0openalex-snapshot
Truth in philosophy: a conceptual engineering approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-026-00456-2openalex-snapshot
A model for “AI”-relevant vulnerability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00075-xopenalex-snapshot
Justice and Empowerment Through Digital Health: Ethical Challenges and Opportunities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-95504-1.00193-9openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-95504-1.00787-0openalex-snapshot
Thinking in Structures: Opposition
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-40622-5.00083-9openalex-snapshot
Theories of Causation in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102327openalex-snapshot
Conceptual disruption and 21st century technologies: A framework
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009351294openalex-snapshot
Translation in Analytic Philosophy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009471497openalex-snapshot
Logical Empiricism as Scientific Philosophy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2023.2289161openalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineering and conceptual change. An argument for the learnability of ameliorated concepts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2024.2367251openalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineering and the dynamics of linguistic intervention
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2024.2376940openalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineering, cognitive deficiency, and the foundations of conceptual inquiry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2024.2436937openalex-snapshot
From group to institutional agency
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2025.2495643openalex-snapshot
What is pragmatist conceptual engineering?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2025.2556750openalex-snapshot
The distinction between generic and specific concepts and why it matters for conceptual engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2025.2595508openalex-snapshot
How to do conceptual ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2025.2601076openalex-snapshot
How ethical aims shape conceptual engineering in science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2026.2615772openalex-snapshot
Engineering responsibility in the age of AI: amelioration or preservation?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2026.2617389openalex-snapshot
Conceptual economics Contra conceptual engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2269985openalex-snapshot
‘Are mental disorders brain disorders?’ is a question of conceptual choice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2313523openalex-snapshot
Brain disorders reconsidered – a response to commentaries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2025.2531401openalex-snapshot
Is it a tastytaste or a greedgrab? The importance of label choice in language design
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2025.2608211openalex-snapshot
From naturalized to actualized thought experiments: cognitive neuroscience, the theory gap, and the method of cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2024.2362567openalex-snapshot
Rethinking Responsibility for Mitigating Climate Change Harm: Advocating Remedial Responsibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/29984750.2025.2548848openalex-snapshot
Translation and linguistic injustice in analytic philosophy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/727900openalex-snapshot
What Conceptual Engineering Can Learn from the History of Philosophy of Science: Healthy Externalism and Metasemantic Plasticity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197799871.003.0001openalex-snapshot
Basic Linguistic Relativity A Quick Sketch
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197799871.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Some Historical Antecedents of Linguistic Relativity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197799871.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf: Lives, Research, and Whorfianism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197799871.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Three Interpretations of Linguistic Relativity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197799871.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Linguistic Relativity and Cognitive Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197799871.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Conclusion: Whorf and Relativity—Yes? or No?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197902769.001.0001openalex-snapshot
From Sovereignty to Guardianship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197902769.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Constituting the Antarctic Political Community
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197902769.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Representing Sentient Antarctica
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197902769.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Nothing About Antarctica Without Antarctica
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197902769.003.0007openalex-snapshot
A Model of Joint Guardianship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197902769.003.0008openalex-snapshot
Facing the Paradox of Protection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197902769.003.0009openalex-snapshot
Governing Antarctica, Governing the World
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918059.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Knowledge and Conceptual Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918059.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Conceptual Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918059.003.0003openalex-snapshot
The Case Against Conceptual Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918059.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Normative Restrictions on Conceptual Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918059.003.0008openalex-snapshot
Expressive Power and Duties of Meaning Production
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918059.003.0010openalex-snapshot
Engineering Social Kind Concepts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918059.003.0011openalex-snapshot
Expressive Power, Hermeneutical Injustice, and Conceptual Access
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780198918059.003.0012openalex-snapshot
On Conceptual Disinformation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780198958109.003.0006openalex-snapshot
The Metaethical Presuppositions of Conceptual Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anad032openalex-snapshot
Recent work in the theory of conceptual engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anae031openalex-snapshot
Lying and oblique intention: Reply to Krstić
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onag021openalex-snapshot
Chomsky, Naturalism, and Conceptual Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqae087openalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineering is old news
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/jices-04-2023-0050openalex-snapshot
Lying in online social networks: a bug or a feature
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.70035openalex-snapshot
What political theory can learn from conceptual engineering: The case of “corruption”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12730openalex-snapshot
Rethinking philosophical methodology: Conceptual engineering meets Value Sensitive Design
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/meta.70004openalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineering, language use, and the neutral implementation challenge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/meta.70005openalex-snapshot
Social externalism and the implementation challenge: Revising socially and politically significant terms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/meta.70006openalex-snapshot
Proofs, computers, and the a priori : Is there anything to fix?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/meta.70007openalex-snapshot
Introduction to the special issue New Thoughts on Conceptual Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/meta.70008openalex-snapshot
The hallmark problem for conceptual engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12471openalex-snapshot
Conceptual engineering, predictive processing, and a new implementation problem
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12494openalex-snapshot
How words matter: A psycholinguistic argument for meaning revision
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12538openalex-snapshot
Ameliorative projects, psychological essentialism, and the power of nouns
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/nup.70012openalex-snapshot
The Folk Concept of Nursing in Australia: A Decolonising Conceptual Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.13064openalex-snapshot
Engineering social concepts: Feasibility and causal models
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.13110openalex-snapshot
What is conceptual engineering good for? The argument from nameability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12379openalex-snapshot
What analytic metaphysics can do for scientific metaphysics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10944281261479058openalex-snapshot
Field Philosophy: A Methodological Approach to Organizational Philosophy-in-Practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5164439openalex-snapshot
Putnam Products: Is Non-alcoholic Beer Beer or Oat Milk Milk?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-5-59-69openalex-snapshot
Intelligent Behavior of Neural Networks in the Context of Conceptual Engineering: Imitating Philosophical Reflection in DeepSeek, ChatGPT and GigaChat Models
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5406/21521123.62.2.02openalex-snapshot
Responsibly Engineering Control
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7218/nenpouseijigaku.75.2_195openalex-snapshot
“Don’t Laugh at Others’ Concepts”:
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.