On the public citation graph

Risk Science Contributions: Three Illustrating Examples

0 signed · 72 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316870openalex-snapshot
Bayesian Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470686539openalex-snapshot
Misconceptions of Risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78242-3openalex-snapshot
Causal Analytics for Applied Risk Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.10.011openalex-snapshot
On the use of conservatism in risk assessments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.018openalex-snapshot
Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.035openalex-snapshot
The strong power of standards in the safety and risk fields: A threat to proper developments of these fields?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106585openalex-snapshot
The cautionary principle in risk management: Foundation and practical use
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106680openalex-snapshot
Three influential risk foundation papers from the 80s and 90s: Are they still state-of-the-art?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8320(00)00023-5openalex-snapshot
Historical background on performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8320(01)00081-3openalex-snapshot
Probabilistic risk analysis for the NASA space shuttle: a brief history and current work
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8320(96)00067-1openalex-snapshot
Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511790850openalex-snapshot
Laws of Fear
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007058325258openalex-snapshot
Historical Relationship Between Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal and Other Types of Risk Assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1999.11979956openalex-snapshot
Statistical Methods for Reliability Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039991289185openalex-snapshot
Dimensions of the Precautionary Principle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870110073729openalex-snapshot
Five charges against the precautionary principle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870210153684openalex-snapshot
Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/136698798377204openalex-snapshot
Risk at a turning point?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/29.6.963openalex-snapshot
Quantitative relationship between cumulative cigarette consumption and lung cancer mortality in Japan
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00040openalex-snapshot
Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00041openalex-snapshot
Illustration of Sampling‐Based Methods for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00455.xopenalex-snapshot
How Useful Is Quantitative Risk Assessment?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.xopenalex-snapshot
On The Quantitative Definition of Risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00781.xopenalex-snapshot
The Precautionary Principle Is Incoherent
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00793.xopenalex-snapshot
Application of the Precautionary Principle by Senior Policy Officials: Results of a Canadian Survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00806.xopenalex-snapshot
Measuring Uncertainty Importance: Investigation and Comparison of Alternative Approaches
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01612.xopenalex-snapshot
On Different Types of Uncertainties in the Context of the Precautionary Principle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01706.xopenalex-snapshot
Clarifying Types of Uncertainty: When Are Models Accurate, and Uncertainties Small?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01707.xopenalex-snapshot
Uncertainties, Precaution, and Science: Focus on the State of Knowledge and How It May Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01708.xopenalex-snapshot
Straightening Out the Grounds for Precaution: A Commentary and Some Suggestions About Terje Aven's “On Different Types of Uncertainties”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12230openalex-snapshot
Is Risk Analysis Scientific?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12774openalex-snapshot
Is the Precautionary Principle Really Incoherent?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12783openalex-snapshot
Yes, The Precautionary Principle Is Incoherent
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12812openalex-snapshot
The Precautionary Principle Has Not Been Shown to Be Incoherent: A Reply to Peterson
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12899openalex-snapshot
An Emerging New Risk Analysis Science: Foundations and Implications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13139openalex-snapshot
Reflections on the Use of Conceptual Research in Risk Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13265openalex-snapshot
On the Limits of the Precautionary Principle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13270openalex-snapshot
Comments to Orri Stefánsson's Paper on the Precautionary Principle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2255906openalex-snapshot
The Concept of Probability in Safety Assessments of Technological Systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.015495openalex-snapshot
Should the precautionary principle guide our actions or our beliefs?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050338openalex-snapshot
The history of the discovery of the cigarette–lung cancer link: evidentiary traditions, corporate denial, global toll: Table 1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004152120.i-352openalex-snapshot
Precautionary Rights and Duties of States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1110.0973openalex-snapshot
A Study of Interactions in the Risk Assessment of Complex Engineering Systems: An Application to Space PSA
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139907openalex-snapshot
The Health Effects of Passive Smoking: An Overview of Systematic Reviews Based on Observational Epidemiological Evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/143601openalex-snapshot
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-5235openalex-snapshot
NASA’s Understanding of Risk in Apollo and Shuttle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Defining Pseudoscience and Science

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4833759openalex-extracted
Visualizing cascading risk effects: organizing disruptive forces and factors towards a color-assisted, standardized cascading risk effects framework
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12320openalex-snapshot
Translations of climate change consequences at the local level: Climate change adaptation in Bergen and Stavanger municipalities in Norway
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-25463-4_7openalex-snapshot
Principles of Probabilistic Piping Reliability Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44202-6_4openalex-snapshot
Statistische Schätzungen und „Strength of knowledge“
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00544-wopenalex-snapshot
Uncertainty, Risk, and Decision-Making:
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.004openalex-snapshot
Adapting risk assessments for a complex future
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121811openalex-snapshot
Is seeking certainty in climate sensitivity measures counterproductive in the context of climate emergency? The case for scenario planning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105813openalex-snapshot
Ethical principles for regulatory risk decision-making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2023.2176914openalex-snapshot
Bibliometric analysis of risk science from 1996 to 2021: insights and implications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2024.2340019openalex-snapshot
A risk science perspective on the COVID-19 risk handling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsac028openalex-snapshot
Risk understanding and risk acknowledgement: a new approach to environmental risk assessment in marine aquaculture
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13776openalex-snapshot
Bank Risk Appetite Communication and Risk Taking: The Key Role of Integrated Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13827openalex-snapshot
Increasing Preparedness for Extreme Events using Plausibility‐Based Scenario Planning: Lessons from COVID‐19
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13884openalex-snapshot
Risk‐layering and optimal insurance uptake under ambiguity: With an application to farmers exposed to drought risk in Austria
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13895openalex-snapshot
Distributed sensemaking in network risk analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13936openalex-snapshot
Cases of real‐life policies related to risk: How can they enhance risk analysis and risk science?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14229openalex-snapshot
On the interconnected nature of risk and responsibility in the research and development of new and emerging technologies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.17715openalex-snapshot
Key attributes of health and environmental risk decision‐making: A scoping review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00641-6openalex-snapshot
Numerate people are less likely to be biased by regular science reporting: the critical roles of scientific reasoning and causal misunderstanding
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17512/znpcz.2022.4openalex-snapshot
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17512/znpcz.2022.4.08openalex-snapshot
DEMPSTER SHAFER THEORY FOR RISK ASSESSMENT IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026144openalex-snapshot
‘Corporate performance’ with ‘corporate resilience’: A revolution or an illusion? Deciphering through a bibliometric prism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1235055openalex-snapshot
Risk communication: lessons from an ethnographic, pragmatic, and Canadian regulatory perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7050070openalex-snapshot
Framework for Operational Resilience Management of Critical Infrastructures and Organizations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1746055openalex-snapshot
The Nature and Identification of CBRN Risks in the VUCA World and a Case Study: Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.