On the public citation graph
Predicting outcomes of case based legal arguments
0 signed · 129 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44593-5_6openalex-snapshot
The Role of Information Extraction for Textual CBR
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00105-xopenalex-snapshot
Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: A computational model and an intelligent learning environment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019513821567openalex-snapshot
An AI model of case-based legal argument from a jurisprudential viewpoint
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019516031847openalex-snapshot
The role of context in case-based legal reasoning: teleological, temporal, and procedural
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1015330.1015422openalex-snapshot
Dynamic Conditional Random Fields: Factorized Probabilistic Models for Labeling and Segmenting Sequence Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/261618.261627openalex-snapshot
Finding legally relevant passages in case opinions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/323706.323716openalex-snapshot
Precedent, deontic logic, and inheritance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/383535.383537openalex-snapshot
Theory based explanation of case law domains
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/089976698300017197openalex-snapshot
Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.25911/5d7a2cfd61d7aopenalex-snapshot
SHYSTER: A Pragmatic Legal Expert System
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.987004openalex-extracted
The Nature of Legal Concepts: Inferential Nodes or Ontological Categories?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_23openalex-snapshot
Argument-Based Machine Learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60450-9_53openalex-snapshot
Knowledge-Aware Method for Confusing Charge Prediction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41264-6_2openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Language Technologies in the Legal Domain
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63800-8_16openalex-snapshot
Blockchain for Ethical and Transparent Generative AI Utilization by Banking and Finance Lawyers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30075-5_49openalex-snapshot
Support for Constructing Theories in Case Law Domains
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_3openalex-snapshot
Using Linguistic Information and Machine Learning Techniques to Identify Entities from Juridical Documents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5_8openalex-snapshot
Application of an Ontology-Based Model to a Selected Fraudulent Disbursement Economic Crime
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36815-8_5openalex-snapshot
Ontological Modeling of a Class of Linked Economic Crimes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8990-8_6openalex-snapshot
Accounting for Social, Spatial, and Textual Interconnections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-523-2_24openalex-snapshot
The Study of Artificial Intelligence as Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-010-9154-1openalex-snapshot
A taxonomy of argumentation models used for knowledge representation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9305-zopenalex-snapshot
Online dispute resolution: an artificial intelligence perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-006-9003-3openalex-snapshot
Legal Case-based Reasoning as Practical Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-006-9004-2openalex-snapshot
AGATHA: Using heuristic search to automate the construction of case law theories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-006-9016-yopenalex-snapshot
An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-008-9070-8openalex-snapshot
An ontology in OWL for legal case-based reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-009-9076-xopenalex-snapshot
Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines in common law of contract
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-009-9077-9openalex-snapshot
Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-009-9079-7openalex-snapshot
Legal concepts as inferential nodes and ontological categories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9125-8openalex-snapshot
A factor-based definition of precedential constraint
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9131-xopenalex-snapshot
A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-015-9166-xopenalex-snapshot
An improved factor based approach to precedential constraint
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016-9178-1openalex-snapshot
A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016-9186-1openalex-snapshot
From Berman and Hafner’s teleological context to Baude and Sachs’ interpretive defaults: an ontological challenge for the next decades of AI and Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9201-1openalex-snapshot
HYPO’S legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09244-1openalex-snapshot
Vertical precedents in formal models of precedential constraint
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09266-0openalex-snapshot
Artificial intelligence as law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09273-1openalex-snapshot
Scalable and explainable legal prediction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09326-7openalex-snapshot
Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09327-6openalex-snapshot
Thirty years of artificial intelligence and law: the third decade
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09329-4openalex-snapshot
Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the first decade
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09338-3openalex-snapshot
Towards a simple mathematical model for the legal concept of balancing of interests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09384-5openalex-snapshot
Toward representing interpretation in factor-based models of precedent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-025-09461-xopenalex-snapshot
Hierarchical models of precedential constraint
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-026-09544-3openalex-snapshot
Generative Discourse Parsing for Indian Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-026-01186-2openalex-snapshot
For Good or Ill? A Conceptual Analysis of the Notion of Dual-use Technology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.007openalex-snapshot
Argument based machine learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2016.10.004openalex-snapshot
An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103387openalex-snapshot
Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.103861openalex-snapshot
Explainable AI tools for legal reasoning about cases: A study on the European Court of Human Rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106165openalex-snapshot
LLMs for legal reasoning: A unified framework and future perspectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123626openalex-snapshot
Knowledge-enhanced model with dual-graph interaction for confusing legal charge prediction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.01.005openalex-snapshot
Summarizing court decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.07.010openalex-snapshot
Relational databases as a massive information source for defeasible argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888909990178openalex-snapshot
Challenges for a CBR framework for argumentation in open MAS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0952813x.2014.921733openalex-snapshot
A possibilistic defeasible logic programming approach to argumentation-based decision-making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2021.1942401openalex-snapshot
Legal decision support systems in Cuba: some background and notes for future projects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19462160903564584openalex-snapshot
Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exi058openalex-snapshot
Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/ext010openalex-snapshot
A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/k-02-2021-0125openalex-snapshot
Moral communication and legal uncertainty in small and medium enterprises
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2859052openalex-snapshot
Legal Decision Support: Exploring Big Data Analytics Approach to Modeling Pharma Patent Validity Cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/compsac.2018.10348openalex-snapshot
Predicting Decisions of the Philippine Supreme Court Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/dasc-picom-cbdcom-cyberscitech49142.2020.00084openalex-snapshot
Determining Worker Type from Legal Text Data using Machine Learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/espre.2014.6890524openalex-snapshot
L-SQUARE: Preliminary extension of the SQUARE methodology to address legal compliance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1142/s0218213012500029openalex-snapshot
MoDiSo: A TOOL FOR BUILDING CONTRACT DISPUTE RESOLUTION SYSTEMS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/1165485.1165492openalex-snapshot
Arguing about cases as practical reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/1165485.1165497openalex-snapshot
Generating legal arguments and predictions from case texts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/1165485.1165512openalex-snapshot
Is linguistic information relevant for the classification of legal texts?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/1568234.1568249openalex-snapshot
Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018359openalex-snapshot
Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018384openalex-snapshot
Modeling authority commitments in two search and seizure cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2514601.2514604openalex-snapshot
Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2746090.2746111openalex-snapshot
Evaluating the use of abstract dialectical frameworks to represent case law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2957757openalex-snapshot
A Universal Model for Discourse-Level Argumentation Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3086512.3086521openalex-snapshot
Predicting trade secret case outcomes using argument schemes and learned quantitative value effect tradeoffs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326723openalex-snapshot
Semi-Supervised Methods for Explainable Legal Prediction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3462757.3466059openalex-snapshot
Discovering the rationale of decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3462757.3466095openalex-snapshot
Practical tools from formal models
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3462757.3466140openalex-snapshot
A simple mathematical model for the legal concept of balancing of interests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3594536.3595138openalex-snapshot
Whatever Happened to Hypotheticals?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3594536.3595158openalex-snapshot
Combining a Legal Knowledge Model with Machine Learning for Reasoning with Legal Cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3709025.3712216openalex-snapshot
Generating Case-Based Legal Arguments with LLMs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3769126.3769212openalex-snapshot
Generating Legal Arguments with Automatically Identified Factor Magnitudes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241257682openalex-snapshot
A Study of Legal Judgment Prediction Based on Deep Learning Multi-Fusion Models—Data from China
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1353/par.0.0034openalex-snapshot
Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17638/03007026openalex-snapshot
Representation Of Case Law For Argumentative Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.nllp-1.5openalex-snapshot
A Legal Approach to Hate Speech – Operationalizing the EU’s Legal Framework against the Expression of Hatred as an NLP Task
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d17-1253openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Modeling Overall Argumentation with Tree Kernels
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1135openalex-snapshot
From legal to technical concept: Towards an automated classification of German political Twitter postings as criminal offenses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22329/il.v30i1.692openalex-snapshot
Defeasible Classifications and Inferences from Definitions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/25655348openalex-snapshot
Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2021/48openalex-snapshot
Monotonicity and Noise-Tolerance in Case-Based Reasoning with Abstract Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20031126aropenalex-snapshot
Case-based reasoning in the law : a formal theory of reasoning by case comparison
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26754/uz.978-84-17633-62-2openalex-snapshot
Processo, administração, acesso e jurisdição da justiça e formas consensuais de solução de conflitos
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-58603-952-3-128openalex-snapshot
Argument Based Moderation of Benefit Assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-167-0-11openalex-snapshot
What Makes a System a Legal Expert?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-468-8-61openalex-snapshot
Abstract Dialectical Frameworks for Legal Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-609-5-11openalex-snapshot
Cases and Stories, Dimensions and Scripts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-243openalex-snapshot
Explanation for Case-Based Reasoning via Abstract Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-726-9-113openalex-snapshot
ANGELIC Secrets: Bridging from Factors to Facts in US Trade Secrets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-11openalex-snapshot
Lessons from Implementing Factors with Magnitude
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-190477openalex-snapshot
Before and after Dung: Argumentation in AI and Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/faia200488openalex-snapshot
An Explainable Approach to Deducing Outcomes in European Court of Human Rights Cases Using ADFs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/faia220452openalex-snapshot
Reasoning with Legal Cases: A Hybrid ADF-ML Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/faia220459openalex-snapshot
The Illinois Intentional Tort Qualitative Dataset
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/faia230940openalex-snapshot
A Note on Hierarchical Constraints
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/faia230941openalex-snapshot
The Importance of Intermediate Factors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/faia362openalex-snapshot
Legal Knowledge and Information Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/app112311080openalex-snapshot
AI Model for Predicting Legal Judgments to Improve Accuracy and Explainability of Online Privacy Invasion Cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/appliedmath6020032openalex-snapshot
Exploring Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Approaches to Legal Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/info16080640openalex-snapshot
DIKWP Semantic Judicial Reasoning: A Framework for Semantic Justice in AI and Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61692-906-0.ch058openalex-snapshot
Staying Legal and Ethical in Global E-Learning Course and Training Developments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2005.05257openalex-snapshot
A Dataset for Statutory Reasoning in Tax Law Entailment and Question Answering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2105.06758openalex-snapshot
Discovering the Rationale of Decisions: Experiments on Aligning Learning and Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2106.14688openalex-snapshot
Using Issues to Explain Legal Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2107.06413openalex-snapshot
Monotonicity and Noise-Tolerance in Case-Based Reasoning with Abstract Argumentation (with Appendix)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.42.2.0154openalex-snapshot
Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/bec441b3z5e0fz49c7z91d5z5fc2ad05d042openalex-snapshot
Méthodes D'Analyse Sémantique De Corpus De Décisions Jurisprudentielles
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.