On the public citation graph

Constructing arguments with a computational model of an argumentation scheme for legal rules

https://doi.org/10.1145/1276318.1276340
0 signed · 28 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8447-0openalex-snapshot
The Pleadings Game
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00118496openalex-snapshot
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.010openalex-snapshot
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511807039openalex-snapshot
Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/b:arti.0000046008.49443.36openalex-snapshot
Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0824-7935.00055openalex-snapshot
Process and Policy: Resource‐Bounded NonDemonstrative Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/158976.158980openalex-snapshot
Monological reason-based logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4openalex-snapshot
Defeasible Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605openalex-snapshot
A theory of justice original edition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5555/2698621.2698942openalex-snapshot
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1093260openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79396-0_8openalex-snapshot
Modeling and Using Polish Legal Knowledge - Commercial Companies Code Ontology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_11openalex-snapshot
Constructing Legal Arguments with Rules in the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format (LKIF)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_16openalex-snapshot
Rulebase Technology and Legal Knowledge Representation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_17openalex-snapshot
Source Norms and Self-regulated Institutions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_2openalex-snapshot
MetaLex XML and the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21350-2_4openalex-snapshot
Araucaria-PL: Software for Teaching Argumentation Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018364openalex-snapshot
Analyzing open source license compatibility issues with Carneades
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2018358.2018384openalex-snapshot
Modeling authority commitments in two search and seizure cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15439/2016f272openalex-snapshot
Modeling conflicts between legal rules
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22329/il.v28i2.550openalex-snapshot
Arguing from Definition to Verbal Classification: The Case of Redefining 'Planet' to Exclude Pluto
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24406/publica-fhg-374759openalex-snapshot
Combining rules and ontologies with Carneades
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2478/v10209-011-0006-9openalex-snapshot
Conflicts in legal knowledge base
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-58603-942-4-21openalex-snapshot
LKIF Core: Principled Ontology Development for the Legal Domain
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-180039openalex-snapshot
Representing argumentation schemes with Constraint Handling Rules (CHR)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-190477openalex-snapshot
Before and after Dung: Argumentation in AI and Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/fi-2009-0088openalex-snapshot
Perseus. Software for Analyzing Persuasion Process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1818-3.ch009openalex-snapshot
Tools and Applications for Reasoning Communities
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.