On the public citation graph
Novice and Expert Sensemaking of Crowdsourced Design Feedback
0 signed · 55 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002openalex-snapshot
Expertise in design: an overview
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(98)00031-3openalex-snapshot
A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026256openalex-snapshot
Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2006.100openalex-snapshot
Making Sense of Sensemaking 2: A Macrocognitive Model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357127openalex-snapshot
Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.169209openalex-snapshot
The cost structure of sensemaking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1837885.1837906openalex-snapshot
Quality management on Amazon Mechanical Turk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675140openalex-snapshot
A Classroom Study of Using Crowd Feedback in the Iterative Design Process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675283openalex-snapshot
Structuring, Aggregating, and Evaluating Crowdsourced Design Critique
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901820openalex-snapshot
Social Network, Web Forum, or Task Market?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/62266.62273openalex-snapshot
Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133openalex-snapshot
Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v3i1.13229openalex-snapshot
Using Anonymity and Communal Efforts to Improve Quality of Crowdsourced Feedback
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1511391openalex-snapshot
The Science of Design: Creating the Artificial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/41166415openalex-snapshot
Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203810088-13openalex-snapshot
A Data–Frame Theory of Sensemaking
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17844-yopenalex-snapshot
LanT: finding experts for digital calligraphy character restoration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2025.10029openalex-snapshot
“Who” designs better? A competition among human, artificial intelligence and human–AI collaboration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2638554openalex-snapshot
Standardizing the Evaluation of Usability Test Results: Criteria Development and Human-AI Collaborative Performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300368openalex-snapshot
How Guiding Questions Facilitate Feedback Exchange in Project-Based Learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376380openalex-snapshot
Decipher: An Interactive Visualization Tool for Interpreting Unstructured Design Feedback from Multiple Providers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3323994.3371017openalex-snapshot
Understanding and Designing Sociotechnical Systems to Support the Impression Management Practices of Online Freelance Workers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3326556openalex-snapshot
Supporting Creative Workers with Crowdsourced Feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395480openalex-snapshot
Designing Interactive Scaffolds to Encourage Reflection on Peer Feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3394978openalex-snapshot
CrowdUI: Supporting Web Design with the Crowd
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445507openalex-snapshot
Ask Me or Tell Me? Enhancing the Effectiveness of Crowdsourced Design Feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3479569openalex-snapshot
Discovering and Validating AI Errors With Crowdsourced Failure Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501946openalex-snapshot
Where Should We Put It? Layout and Placement Strategies of Documents in Augmented Reality for Collaborative Sensemaking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3502718.3524746openalex-snapshot
Improving TA Feedback on In-Class Coding Assignments for Introductory Computer Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533410openalex-snapshot
Design Opportunities for Freelancing Platforms: Online Freelancers’ Views on a Worker-Centred Design Fiction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3542921openalex-snapshot
What Did My AI Learn? How Data Scientists Make Sense of Model Behavior
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3571817openalex-snapshot
Visualizing Topics and Opinions Helps Students Interpret Large Collections of Peer Feedback for Creative Projects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3610220openalex-snapshot
User Perspectives on Branching in Computer-Aided Design
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3635636.3656183openalex-snapshot
When to Give Feedback: Exploring Tradeoffs in the Timing of Design Feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3641000openalex-snapshot
Collective Privacy Sensemaking on Social Media about Period and Fertility Tracking post Roe v. Wade
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3714316openalex-snapshot
Friction: Deciphering Writing Feedback into Writing Revisions through LLM-Assisted Reflection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3719160.3737636openalex-snapshot
Feedstack: Layering Structured Representations Over Unstructured Feedback to Scaffold Human–AI Conversation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3746058.3758343openalex-snapshot
Evaluating Usability Challenges in VR Games for Older Adults: A Comparison With and Without AI Assistance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3746059.3747703openalex-snapshot
Synthia: Visually Interpreting and Synthesizing Feedback for Writing Revision
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3757620openalex-snapshot
Learning AI Auditing: A Case Study of Teenagers Auditing a Generative AI Model
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3799188openalex-snapshot
Empowering Users through Feedback-adaptive Personal Informatics Tools to Support Wellbeing and Self-Compassion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18034/ei.v8i1.491openalex-snapshot
Crowdsourced Software Testing: A Timely Opportunity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/land12020394openalex-snapshot
Simulating Urban Element Design with Pedestrian Attention: Visual Saliency as Aid for More Visible Wayfinding Design
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.