On the public citation graph
Resolvable vs. Irresolvable Disagreement
0 signed · 87 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04280-0_5openalex-snapshot
Epistemic Considerations on Expert Disagreement, Normative Justification, and Inconsistency Regarding Multi-criteria Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90047-bopenalex-snapshot
Group decision making and communication technology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.034openalex-snapshot
Grader Variability and the Importance of Reference Standards for Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Diabetic Retinopathy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0273-4openalex-snapshot
Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0887-3801(1995)9:4(244)openalex-snapshot
Using Technology to Improve Delphi Method
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478613openalex-snapshot
Generalized Logistic Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10476271openalex-snapshot
Normal Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Multinomial Models with Large Degrees of Freedom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928008827941openalex-snapshot
Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/135467896394500openalex-snapshot
Expert Judgement and Expert Disagreement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2012.665755openalex-snapshot
Facilitating Diverse Political Engagement with the Living Voters Guide
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2011.6126394openalex-snapshot
Annotator rationales for visual recognition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2004.00147.xopenalex-snapshot
Testing for Marginal Independence between Two Categorical Variables with Multiple Responses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00700.xopenalex-snapshot
Interrater reliability for sleep scoring according to the Rechtschaffen & Kales and the new AASM standard
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1977.tb02416.xopenalex-snapshot
Interactions Between Jurors as a Function of Majority vs. Unanimity Decision Rules
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00028.xopenalex-snapshot
Groupthink versus The Wisdom of Crowds: The Social Epistemology of Deliberation and Dissent
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145249openalex-snapshot
Supporting reflective public thought with considerit
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531677openalex-snapshot
Integrating on-demand fact-checking with public dialogue
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858268openalex-snapshot
Toward a Learning Science for Complex Crowdsourcing Tasks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3152889openalex-snapshot
Crowdsourcing Ground Truth for Medical Relation Extraction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim010150024openalex-snapshot
Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/000271627340700115openalex-snapshot
IRVING L. JANIS. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Pp. iii, 276. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin, 1972. $4.50
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458openalex-snapshot
An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11756openalex-snapshot
Who Said What: Modeling Individual Labelers Improves Classification
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v4i1.13270openalex-snapshot
MicroTalk: Using Argumentation to Improve Crowdsourcing Accuracy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v4i1.13287openalex-snapshot
Why Is That Relevant? Collecting Annotator Rationales for Relevance Judgments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/n15-1047openalex-snapshot
Active Learning with Rationales for Text Classification
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1707.01836openalex-snapshot
Cardiologist-Level Arrhythmia Detection with Convolutional Neural Networks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.2350openalex-snapshot
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine Inter-scorer Reliability Program: Sleep Stage Scoring
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.63317/2esatvw48hsmopenalex-snapshot
Irony and Sarcasm: Corpus Generation and Analysis Using Crowdsourcing
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10464-0_54openalex-snapshot
Language Use and Susceptibility in Online Conversation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-024-00276-zopenalex-snapshot
Quality over quantity? The role of data quality and uncertainty for AI in surgery
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.163openalex-snapshot
WITHDRAWN: Two-dimensional predictive model: Data analysis using regression algorithm
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108872225.006openalex-snapshot
Doing Human-Centered Machine Learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2489030openalex-snapshot
PromptPilot: Exploring User Experience of Prompting with AI-Enhanced Initiative in LLMs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2019.2946162openalex-snapshot
A Survey on Data Collection for Machine Learning: A Big Data - AI Integration Perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313054openalex-snapshot
Machine-Crowd-Expert Model for Increasing User Engagement and Annotation Quality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313554openalex-snapshot
Leveraging Peer Communication to Enhance Crowdsourcing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3308560.3317085openalex-snapshot
Capturing Expert Arguments from Medical Adjudication Discussions in a Machine-readable Format
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376290openalex-snapshot
Expert Discussions Improve Comprehension of Difficult Cases in Medical Image Assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376293openalex-snapshot
Digital Juries: A Civics-Oriented Approach to Platform Governance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376506openalex-snapshot
Ambiguity-aware AI Assistants for Medical Data Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3359164openalex-snapshot
Efficient Elicitation Approaches to Estimate Collective Crowd Answers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3359178openalex-snapshot
Understanding Expert Disagreement in Medical Data Analysis through Structured Adjudication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3359227openalex-snapshot
Paying Crowd Workers for Collaborative Work
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445423openalex-snapshot
The Disagreement Deconvolution: Bringing Machine Learning Performance Metrics In Line With Reality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3449161openalex-snapshot
Moderator Chatbot for Deliberative Discussion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3462204.3481729openalex-snapshot
Investigating and Mitigating Biases in Crowdsourced Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3476073openalex-snapshot
The Challenge of Variable Effort Crowdsourcing and How Visible Gold Can Help
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3476076openalex-snapshot
Goldilocks: Consistent Crowdsourced Scalar Annotations with Relative Uncertainty
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3479531openalex-snapshot
On the State of Reporting in Crowdsourcing Experiments and a Checklist to Aid Current Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512239openalex-snapshot
The Influences of Task Design on Crowdsourced Judgement: A Case Study of Recidivism Risk Evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519614openalex-snapshot
Debiased Label Aggregation for Subjective Crowdsourcing Tasks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502004openalex-snapshot
Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Models
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517441openalex-snapshot
Toward User-Driven Algorithm Auditing: Investigating users’ strategies for uncovering harmful algorithmic behavior
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3494522openalex-snapshot
A Survey on Task Assignment in Crowdsourcing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3512902openalex-snapshot
Empathosphere: Promoting Constructive Communication in Ad-hoc Virtual Teams through Perspective-taking Spaces
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580645openalex-snapshot
A hunt for the Snark: Annotator Diversity in Data Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3555212openalex-snapshot
Reliance and Automation for Human-AI Collaborative Data Labeling Conflict Resolution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3555632openalex-snapshot
Impact of Annotator Demographics on Sentiment Dataset Labeling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3579601openalex-snapshot
Deliberating with AI: Improving Decision-Making for the Future through Participatory AI Design and Stakeholder Deliberation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3582269.3615600openalex-snapshot
Photo Steward: A Deliberative Collective Intelligence Workflow for Validating Historical Archives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3610074openalex-snapshot
Judgment Sieve: Reducing Uncertainty in Group Judgments through Interventions Targeting Ambiguity versus Disagreement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3640543.3645157openalex-snapshot
DynamicLabels: Supporting Informed Construction of Machine Learning Label Sets with Crowd Feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3640543.3645204openalex-snapshot
Studying Collaborative Interactive Machine Teaching in Image Classification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3641023openalex-snapshot
The State of Pilot Study Reporting in Crowdsourcing: A Reflection on Best Practices and Guidelines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3714010openalex-snapshot
The Role of Expertise in Effectively Moderating Harmful Social Media Content
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3711074openalex-snapshot
Summaries, Highlights, and Action Items: Design, Implementation and Evaluation of an LLM-powered Meeting Recap System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3757707openalex-snapshot
Wisdom of the Crowd, Without the Crowd: A Socratic LLM for Asynchronous Deliberation on Perspectivist Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3805689.3812370openalex-snapshot
Online Communities as Collaborative Testbeds for Collective Alignment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i6.25840openalex-snapshot
Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v7i1.5268openalex-snapshot
Understanding the Impact of Text Highlighting in Crowdsourcing Tasks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12012openalex-snapshot
Annotator Rationales for Labeling Tasks in Crowdsourcing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.421openalex-snapshot
Does Putting a Linguist in the Loop Improve NLU Data Collection?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.828187openalex-snapshot
In Search of Ambiguity: A Three-Stage Workflow Design to Clarify Annotation Guidelines for Crowd Workers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2110.07750openalex-snapshot
Is that a Duiker or Dik Dik Next to the Giraffe? Impacts of Uncertainty on Classification Efficiency in Citizen Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/87b2cc34z8b22z4bf6z8db0zf07d6b1f8a89openalex-snapshot
Active control of complexity growth in Language Games
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.