On the public citation graph
Comparison of Software Design Models
0 signed · 70 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58457-7_23openalex-snapshot
A Comparative Analysis of Business Process Model Similarity Measures
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02674-4_11openalex-snapshot
Establishing Correspondences between Models with the Epsilon Comparison Language
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25160-3openalex-snapshot
Business Process Model and Notation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26982-1_12openalex-snapshot
Business Process Model and Notation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-005-0021-6openalex-snapshot
Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0278-4openalex-snapshot
How effective is UML modeling ?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-014-0408-2openalex-snapshot
Evaluating the effort of composing design models: a controlled experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-014-0430-4openalex-snapshot
“No shit” or “Oh, shit!”: responses to observations on the use of UML in professional practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-007-0023-3openalex-snapshot
Differencing and merging of architectural views
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-009-9123-yopenalex-snapshot
Empirical evidence in global software engineering: a systematic review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(92)90136-jopenalex-snapshot
On the editing distance between unordered labeled trees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-799959-3.00021-5openalex-snapshot
Business Process Model and Notation—BPMN
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.11.001openalex-snapshot
A two-stage framework for UML specification matching
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.011openalex-snapshot
Using mapping studies as the basis for further research – A participant-observer case study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.008openalex-snapshot
Model-Driven Engineering as a new landscape for traceability management: A systematic literature review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.12.006openalex-snapshot
Empirical studies concerning the maintenance of UML diagrams and their use in the maintenance of code: A systematic mapping study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007openalex-snapshot
Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.06.040openalex-snapshot
Search-based metamodel matching with structural and syntactic measures
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.028openalex-snapshot
A systematic mapping study on the combination of software architecture and agile development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2013.04.007openalex-snapshot
Applying model-driven engineering in small software enterprises
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000685openalex-snapshot
DSMDiff: a differentiation tool for domain-specific models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/17440080910983556openalex-snapshot
A survey on model versioning approaches
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/cvsm.2009.5071714openalex-snapshot
Different models for model matching: An analysis of approaches to support model differencing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsec.2014.6978199openalex-snapshot
Similarity assessment of UML class diagrams using a greedy algorithm
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsm.2003.1235402openalex-snapshot
Difference tools for analysis and design documents
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2018.290110057openalex-snapshot
Collaborative-Design Conflicts: Costs and Solutions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2002.1000449openalex-snapshot
A state-of-the-art survey on software merging
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2007.1001openalex-snapshot
Cross versus Within-Company Cost Estimation Studies: A Systematic Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2011.112openalex-snapshot
Matching and Merging of Variant Feature Specifications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2013.56openalex-snapshot
Variability in Software Systems—A Systematic Literature Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2013.9openalex-snapshot
MADMatch: Many-to-Many Approximate Diagram Matching for Design Comparison
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1142/s021819401571014xopenalex-snapshot
Comparison of Design Models: A Systematic Mapping Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1370175.1370201openalex-snapshot
Constructing difference tools for models using the SiDiff framework
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1739230.1739240openalex-snapshot
Assessing the impact of aspects on model composition effort
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1806799.1806887openalex-snapshot
The educational value of mapping studies of software engineering literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1810295.1810404openalex-snapshot
Empirical evaluation of effort on composing design models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1826147.1826152openalex-snapshot
Fine-grained metamodel-assisted model comparison
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1985793.1985882openalex-snapshot
Model-driven engineering practices in industry
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/233269.233366openalex-snapshot
Change detection in hierarchically structured information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/235968.233366openalex-snapshot
Change detection in hierarchically structured information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2430545.2430547openalex-snapshot
Business Process Model Merging
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2631685openalex-snapshot
Regression Testing of Web Service: A Systematic Mapping Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3092694openalex-snapshot
Similarity of Business Process Models—A State-of-the-Art Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3593434openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-128openalex-snapshot
How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/ease2010.4openalex-snapshot
The value of mapping studies – A participant-observer case study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2575405openalex-snapshot
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.74.27openalex-snapshot
Saying Hello World with Epsilon – A Solution to the 2011 Instructive Case
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1402.0157openalex-snapshot
UML Artifacts Reuse: State of the Art
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5220/0004027303190323openalex-snapshot
Measuring UML Model Similarity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5220/0004311102650277openalex-snapshot
A Survey of Model Comparison Approaches and Applications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7763/lnse.2016.v4.221openalex-snapshot
UML Class Diagrams: Similarity Aspects and Matching
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/smr.70097openalex-snapshot
Software Cost Estimation Using a Hybrid Deep Convolutional LSTM and Optimization Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83790-6_6openalex-snapshot
Secure Intelligence Development Lifecycle (SIDL) Model for Vulnerability Detection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-21966-4_43openalex-snapshot
A Comparative Analysis of Software Quality Models
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105922openalex-snapshot
Technological support for detection and prediction of plant diseases: A systematic mapping study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen.2018.5334openalex-snapshot
Software development effort estimation: a systematic mapping study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00051144.2023.2216540openalex-snapshot
Analysis of cost estimation using the web metrics and cost driver in the high performance of web developers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3411564.3411580openalex-snapshot
Usage of Psychophysiological Data as an Improvement in the Context of Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3742899openalex-snapshot
Investigating EEG Microstate Analysis in Cognitive Software Engineering Tasks: A Systematic Mapping Study and Taxonomy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2024296/v1openalex-snapshot
OLCE: Optimized Learning-based Cost Estimation for Global Software Projects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/s23010031openalex-snapshot
Federated Learning Attacks Revisited: A Critical Discussion of Gaps, Assumptions, and Evaluation Setups
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2105.14059openalex-snapshot
On the Usage of Psychophysiological Data in Software Engineering: An Extended Systematic Mapping Study
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.