On the public citation graph
Opportunities and Challenges in Repeated Revisions to Pull-Requests: An Empirical Study
0 signed · 116 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20883-7_11openalex-snapshot
Why Do People Give Up FLOSSing? A Study of Contributor Disengagement in Open Source
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10242-4openalex-snapshot
Advances in Software Engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-013-9192-8openalex-snapshot
Sharing Knowledge and Expertise: The CSCW View of Knowledge Management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-015-9381-9openalex-snapshot
An empirical study of the impact of modern code review practices on software quality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9512-6openalex-snapshot
Curating GitHub for engineered software projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-019-09720-xopenalex-snapshot
How does code style inconsistency affect pull request integration? An exploratory study on 117 GitHub projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-019-09728-3openalex-snapshot
Whom are you going to call? determinants of @-mentions in Github discussions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09870-3openalex-snapshot
An Empirical Investigation of Relevant Changes and Automation Needs in Modern Code Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09909-5openalex-snapshot
An exploratory study on confusion in code reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-016-5595-8openalex-snapshot
Determinants of pull-based development in the context of continuous integration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9625-5openalex-snapshot
Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.004openalex-snapshot
Responding to student writing: Teachers’ philosophies and practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101826openalex-snapshot
From feedback to revisions: Effects of feedback features and perceptions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.05.037openalex-snapshot
Extracting useful software development information from mobile application reviews: A survey of intelligent mining techniques and tools
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.01.004openalex-snapshot
Reviewer recommendation for pull-requests in GitHub: What can we learn from code review and bug assignment?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001openalex-snapshot
The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003openalex-snapshot
The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004openalex-snapshot
A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.01.001openalex-snapshot
Is feedback pedagogically correct?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.001openalex-snapshot
Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.016openalex-snapshot
What’s in a GitHub Star? Understanding Repository Starring Practices in a Social Coding Platform
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.004openalex-snapshot
Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9openalex-snapshot
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318openalex-snapshot
Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1499075openalex-snapshot
The alignment of written peer feedback with draft problems and its impact on revision in peer assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm030openalex-snapshot
Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2928566openalex-snapshot
What are the Characteristics of Reopened Pull Requests? A Case Study on Open Source Projects in GitHub
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/chase.2013.6614728openalex-snapshot
Why do newcomers abandon open source software projects?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/esem.2011.28openalex-snapshot
Survey Reproduction of Defect Reporting in Industrial Software Development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/esem.2019.8870181openalex-snapshot
On the abandonment and survival of open source projects: An empirical investigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2014.407openalex-snapshot
Paid vs. Volunteer Work in Open Source
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icse-nier.2017.18openalex-snapshot
Anger and Its Direction in Collaborative Software Development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icse.2013.6606617openalex-snapshot
Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icse.2015.55openalex-snapshot
Work Practices and Challenges in Pull-Based Development: The Integrator's Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icse.2017.25openalex-snapshot
Understanding the Impressions, Motivations, and Barriers of One Time Code Contributors to FLOSS Projects: A Survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icse43902.2021.00093openalex-snapshot
What Makes a Great Maintainer of Open Source Projects?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icse43902.2021.00096openalex-snapshot
Leaving My Fingerprints: Motivations and Challenges of Contributing to OSS for Social Good
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsme.2016.31openalex-snapshot
Understanding the Factors That Impact the Popularity of GitHub Repositories
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsme.2019.00043openalex-snapshot
Do as I Do, Not as I Say: Do Contribution Guidelines Match the GitHub Contribution Process?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2017.265100500openalex-snapshot
Code Reviewing in the Trenches: Challenges and Best Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/msr.2015.21openalex-snapshot
Characteristics of Useful Code Reviews: An Empirical Study at Microsoft
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/msr.2017.17openalex-snapshot
Predicting Usefulness of Code Review Comments Using Textual Features and Developer Experience
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/qrs.2016.28openalex-snapshot
What Makes a Satisficing Bug Report?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/saner.2016.68openalex-snapshot
More Common Than You Think: An In-depth Study of Casual Contributors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/saner.2017.7884606openalex-snapshot
Code of conduct in open source projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/saner.2019.8667996openalex-snapshot
A Study on the Interplay between Pull Request Review and Continuous Integration Builds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/saner.2019.8668024openalex-snapshot
Confusion in Code Reviews: Reasons, Impacts, and Coping Strategies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/saner48275.2020.9054818openalex-snapshot
The Silent Helper: The Impact of Continuous Integration on Code Reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/soheal.2019.00009openalex-snapshot
Why do developers take breaks from contributing to OSS projects? A preliminary analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2004.1274039openalex-snapshot
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2013.2297712openalex-snapshot
Automatic Summarization of Bug Reports
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2015.2500238openalex-snapshot
Automatically Recommending Peer Reviewers in Modern Code Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2016.2576451openalex-snapshot
Process Aspects and Social Dynamics of Contemporary Code Review: Insights from Open Source Development and Industrial Practice at Microsoft
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2019.2960357openalex-snapshot
Effects of Personality Traits on Pull Request Acceptance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2021.3053403openalex-snapshot
Are You Still Working on This? An Empirical Study on Pull Request Abandonment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/vlhcc.2017.8103456openalex-snapshot
Evaluating how static analysis tools can reduce code review effort
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15705openalex-snapshot
How to be a good peer reviewer of scientific manuscripts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.xopenalex-snapshot
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031621openalex-snapshot
Group awareness in distributed software development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1453101.1453146openalex-snapshot
What makes a good bug report?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718973openalex-snapshot
Information needs in bug reports
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1806799.1806871openalex-snapshot
Characterizing and predicting which bugs get fixed
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441791openalex-snapshot
Mutual assessment in the social programmer ecosystem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441792openalex-snapshot
Impression formation in online peer production
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468681openalex-snapshot
Facilitating developer-user interactions with mobile app review digests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2491411.2491444openalex-snapshot
Convergent contemporary software peer review practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2568225.2568233openalex-snapshot
Analyze this! 145 questions for data scientists in software engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2568225.2568260openalex-snapshot
An exploratory study of the pull-based software development model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2568225.2568315openalex-snapshot
Influence of social and technical factors for evaluating contribution in GitHub
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2593882.2593887openalex-snapshot
The (R) Evolution of social media in software engineering
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2597073.2597074openalex-snapshot
The promises and perils of mining GitHub
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2597073.2597076openalex-snapshot
The impact of code review coverage and code review participation on software quality: a case study of the qt, VTK, and ITK projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2597073.2597082openalex-snapshot
Modern code reviews in open-source projects: which problems do they fix?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2635868.2635882openalex-snapshot
Let's talk about it: evaluating contributions through discussion in GitHub
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675215openalex-snapshot
Social Barriers Faced by Newcomers Placing Their First Contribution in Open Source Software Projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2786805.2786850openalex-snapshot
Quality and productivity outcomes relating to continuous integration in GitHub
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2804381.2804387openalex-snapshot
The challenges of sentiment detection in the social programmer ecosystem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819950openalex-snapshot
Effectiveness of Conflict Management Strategies in Peer Review Process of Online Collaboration Projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884826openalex-snapshot
Work practices and challenges in pull-based development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884871openalex-snapshot
The challenges of staying together while moving fast
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2950290.2950299openalex-snapshot
What would users change in my app? summarizing app reviews for recommending software changes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3106237.3106285openalex-snapshot
Detecting missing information in bug descriptions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3196398.3196403openalex-snapshot
A benchmark study on sentiment analysis for software engineering research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3274404openalex-snapshot
Information Needs in Contemporary Code Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3338906.3338918openalex-snapshot
What the fork: a study of inefficient and efficient forking practices in social coding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3359224openalex-snapshot
The Signals that Potential Contributors Look for When Choosing Open-source Projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3368089.3409722openalex-snapshot
Understanding the impact of GitHub suggested changes on recommendations between developers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3422392.3422459openalex-snapshot
What to Expect from Code Review Bots on GitHub?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155218761222openalex-snapshot
Navigating manuscript assessment: The new practitioner’s guide to primary literature peer review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2020.61openalex-snapshot
Open versus blind peer review: is anonymity better than transparency?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03812openalex-snapshot
How to improve the quality of peer reviews? – Three suggestions for system-level changes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9030483openalex-snapshot
Sentiment Analysis Based on Deep Learning: A Comparative Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5326.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.111openalex-snapshot
Gender differences and bias in open source: pull request acceptance of women versus men
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.73openalex-snapshot
Software development: do good manners matter?
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-025-10706-1openalex-snapshot
Ecosystem-wide influences on pull request decisions: insights from NPM
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127178openalex-snapshot
CLG: Automated checklist generation for improved pull request quality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/apsec65559.2024.00014openalex-snapshot
An Empirical Study of Cross-Project Pull Request Recommendation in GitHub
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/msr59073.2023.00051openalex-snapshot
Connecting the .dotfiles: Checked-In Secret Exposure with Extra (Lateral Movement) Steps
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2022.3224053openalex-snapshot
To Follow or Not to Follow: Understanding Issue/Pull-Request Templates on GitHub
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2024.3443741openalex-snapshot
Predicting the First Response Latency of Maintainers and Contributors in Pull Requests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3597503.3639196openalex-snapshot
Mining Pull Requests to Detect Process Anomalies in Open Source Software Development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3610220openalex-snapshot
User Perspectives on Branching in Computer-Aided Design
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642912openalex-snapshot
To Reach the Unreachable: Exploring the Potential of VR Hand Redirection for Upper Limb Rehabilitation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3659614openalex-snapshot
Lipwatch: Enabling Silent Speech Recognition on Smartwatches using Acoustic Sensing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3832783.3837417openalex-snapshot
Recovering Revisions of Pull Requests with Altered History
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1360/ssi-2023-0064openalex-snapshot
Crowd intelligence paradigm: a new paradigm shift in software development
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.