Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository
metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is
labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not
evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
Mammographic Features of Breast Cancers at Single Reading with Computer-aided Detection and at Double Reading in a Large Multicenter Prospective Trial of Computer-aided Detection: CADET II
Concurrent CAD with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Improves Reading Time and Maintains Performance for Dedicated Breast Radiologists and General Radiologists
A Multi-Reader Multi-Case Study Comparing Mammographic Breast Cancer Detection Rates on Mammograms by Resident and Consultant Radiologists in Singapore with and Without the Use of AI Assistance
Impact of real-life use of artificial intelligence as support for human reading in a population-based breast cancer screening program with mammography and tomosynthesis
Impact of AI assistance on reading time, cancer detection rate, and abnormal interpretation rate in screening and diagnostic mammography: a prospective alternating-month study
Artificial intelligence-based tumor size measurement on mammography: agreement with pathology and comparison with human readers’ assessments across multiple imaging modalities
Development of a deep learning-based automated diagnostic system (DLADS) for classifying mammographic lesions — a first large-scale multi-institutional clinical trial in Japan
Combining artificial intelligence analysis with expert mammogram reading: Determining the optimal AI positivity cut-off point for the French population-based breast cancer screening program
Antilogic, a new supervised machine learning software for the automatic interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility testing in clinical microbiology: proof-of-concept on three frequently isolated bacterial species
Impact of a Categorical AI System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Interpretation by Both General Radiologists and Breast Imaging Specialists
Mammography-based artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and BI-RADS categorization using multi-view and multi-level convolutional neural networks
Unsupervised Feature Extraction for Various Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using Multiple Convolutional Autoencoders and 2.5-Dimensional Local Image Analysis
Comparison of Diagnostic Performance in Mammography Assessment: Radiologist with Reference to Clinical Information Versus Standalone Artificial Intelligence Detection
Clinical Performance Tradeoffs of ChatGPT-5.2 Thinking (OpenAI) Compared with Radiologist Interpretation in Biopsy-Referred Mammography: Cancer Detection, False Positives, and Laterality
Additional file 1 of Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms
Trends and Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: A Social Media Analysis
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.