On the public citation graph

The Goatherd’s Cup (Theoc. Id. 1.27–60)

https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004375130_006

0 signed · 15 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1004376openalex-extracted

Striking the Balance between Anti-Discrimination Laws and First Amendment Freedoms: An Alternative Proposal to Preserve Diversity

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1371058openalex-extracted

The Constitutional Future of Race-Neutral Efforts to Achieve Diversity and Avoid Racial Isolation in Elementary and Secondary Schools

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1462234openalex-extracted

Passing-On Defense and Indirect Purchaser Standing in Actions for Damages Against the Violations of Competition Law: What Can the EC Learn from the US?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1647002openalex-extracted

Shareholder Primacy and the Business Judgment Rule: Arguments for Expanded Corporate Democracy

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1681673openalex-extracted

Corporate Governance and Competition Policy

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1932393openalex-extracted

Deference to the Executive in the United States after 9/11: Congress, the Courts, and the Office of Legal Counsel

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2017258openalex-extracted

The Elephant in Hosanna-Tabor

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2027482openalex-extracted

Level Up: Employing the Commerce Clause to Federalize the Sale of Goods

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2488175openalex-extracted

Public Opinion and the Abolition or Retention of the Death Penalty Why Is the United States Different?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2561619openalex-extracted

Revitalizing the Information Quality Act as a Procedural Cure for Unsound Regulatory Science: A Greenhouse Gas Rulemaking Case Study

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2619461openalex-extracted

Complications in Putting Unborn Spoiled Brats to Work: Using Lessons from Labor Supply Theory to Design Incentive Trusts

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3038380openalex-extracted

Interpersonal Human Rights

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3147346openalex-extracted

The Balance between Investor Protection and the Right to Regulate in Investment Treaties: A Scoping Paper

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3284499openalex-extracted

A Will for Willa Cather

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.348920openalex-extracted

Towards a Legal History of American Criminal Theory: Culture and Doctrine from Blackstone to the Model Penal Code

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.