On the public citation graph

De la Prétendue Discrétion de la Cour Internationale de Justice de Refuser de Donner un Avis Consultatif

https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004479012_035
0 signed · 10 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_ej.9789028608528.709_846.5openalex-snapshot
La Jurisprudence de la Cour permanente de Justice internationale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004640689openalex-snapshot
The Role and Record of the International Court of Justice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789028604520.341-412openalex-snapshot
Les avis consultatifs de la cour permanente de justice internationale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789028604926.001-114openalex-snapshot
La jurisprudence de la cour permanente de justice internationale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789028606326.001-076openalex-snapshot
Les avis consultatifs de la Cour permanente de Justice internationale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/837882openalex-snapshot
Dictionnaire de la Terminologie du Droit International
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-53296-4openalex-snapshot
Universelles Völkerrecht. Theorie und Praxis.

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1734443openalex-extracted
The ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo: Different Perspectives of a Delicate Question
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0069005800008493openalex-snapshot
The ICJ, Advisory Opinions, and the Judicial Function: Between Adjudication and Consultation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198814894.003.0081openalex-snapshot
Article 65
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.