On the public citation graph
Linking Democratic Preferences and Political Participation: Evidence from Germany
0 signed · 129 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.002openalex-snapshot
The Availability of Local-Area Commercial Physical Activity–Related Facilities and Physical Activity Among Adolescents
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.03.006openalex-snapshot
Education and support for representative, direct and stealth democracy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511720444openalex-snapshot
Participation and Democratic Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511896941.013openalex-snapshot
Public Opinion and Democratic Politics: The Problem of Nonattitudes and Social Construction of Political Judgment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.29openalex-snapshot
Ideals and Actions: Do Citizens’ Patterns of Political Participation Correspond to their Conceptions of Democracy?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055401000107openalex-snapshot
Process Preferences and American Politics: What the People Want Government to Be
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034449openalex-snapshot
"From Jerusalem to Jericho": A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225openalex-snapshot
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/317989openalex-snapshot
The Measurement of Personal Values in Survey Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyq024openalex-snapshot
Availability of sports facilities as moderator of the intention-sports participation relationship among adolescents
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12010openalex-snapshot
Are ‘Good’ Citizens ‘Good’ Participants? Testing Citizenship Norms and Political Participation across 25 Nations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12097openalex-snapshot
Supporting Democracy: Political Participation and Political Attitudes. Exploring Causality using Panel Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12092openalex-snapshot
Public Support for Expert Decision-Making: Evidence from Finland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1979.tb01226.xopenalex-snapshot
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02052.xopenalex-snapshot
Which decision‐making arrangements generate the strongest legitimacy beliefs? Evidence from a randomised field experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555openalex-snapshot
Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/156913307x233692openalex-snapshot
Democratic Resource or Democratic Threat? Profiles of Critical and Uncritical Citizens in Comparative Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011434009openalex-snapshot
Citizens’ Conceptualizations of Democracy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299504800112openalex-snapshot
Rational Choice and Political Participation — Evaluating the Debate
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1998-0604openalex-snapshot
Umweltbewußtsein und Umweltverhalten in Low- und High-Cost-Situationen
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1059650openalex-snapshot
Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1954644openalex-snapshot
Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics?2nd edition. By Lester W. Milbrath and M. L. Goel. (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1977. Pp. xi + 223. $4.95, paper.)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3791218openalex-snapshot
Political Participation in the United States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/589742openalex-snapshot
Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2012.01.29openalex-snapshot
La percepción del proceso político por parte de los ciudadanos. Una evaluación crítica de la consistencia de las preferencias y las preguntas de encuesta
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203873427openalex-snapshot
Referendums and Representative Democracy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2015-1-151openalex-snapshot
Dialogorientierte Beteiligungsverfahren: Wirkungsvolle oder sinnlose Innovationen? Das Beispiel Bürgerhaushalt
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-3597openalex-snapshot
Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.38-2454openalex-snapshot
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.39-0604openalex-snapshot
A virtuous circle: political communications in postindustrial societies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.39-1833openalex-snapshot
Parties without partisans: political change in advanced industrial democracies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-0603openalex-snapshot
Democratic phoenix: reinventing political activism
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4598230openalex-extracted
Civic Engagement and Government Spending: Lessons From Global Warming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34991-2_16openalex-snapshot
Beteiligungspolitik unter Grün-Schwarz: Kontinuität und Wandel
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35171-7_6openalex-snapshot
Populistische (De-)mobilisierung in Deutschland?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38597-2_3openalex-snapshot
Dialogorientierte Beteiligung: Individuelle Bestimmungsgründe für die Teilnahme und Bewertung
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39078-5_16openalex-snapshot
Politische Kultur der gelockerten Bindungen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41371-2_16openalex-snapshot
Political Culture of the Loosened Bindings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-024-09468-3openalex-snapshot
The Relationship Between Understanding of Democracy and Political Participation in Russia Under Putin’s Non-democratic Regime
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-021-00323-0openalex-snapshot
A Tale of Odds and Ratios: Political Preference Formation in Postindustrial Democracies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00407-5openalex-snapshot
Populismus versus majoritärer Relativismus: Zu einer wichtigen Unterscheidung zwischen Demokratiekonzeptionen in der Bevölkerung
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2026.107149openalex-snapshot
Citizens' preferences for urban planning participation processes: A latent class analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102493openalex-snapshot
Support for a populist form of democratic politics or political discontent? How conceptions of democracy relate to support for the AfD
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101906openalex-snapshot
How do citizens perceive the use of Artificial Intelligence in public sector decisions?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101479openalex-snapshot
Grievances, resources, or values? Predicting online citizen-initiated government contacts in China
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108973434openalex-snapshot
The Meaning of Democracy in Southeast Asia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2020.1openalex-snapshot
Who Supports Citizens Selected by Lot to be the Main Policymakers? A Study of French Citizens
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1475676526101601openalex-snapshot
Beyond the ideal type: Investigating ‘mixed preferences’ for who should govern in nine European countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773920000107openalex-snapshot
How citizens evaluate participatory processes: a conjoint analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773922000194openalex-snapshot
Citizens’ preferences for liberal democracy and its deformations: evidence from Germany
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773922000479openalex-snapshot
Unequal inequalities? How participatory inequalities affect democratic legitimacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773926100654openalex-snapshot
Not my democracy: conceptions, discontent, and participation in Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34282-wopenalex-snapshot
The public’s preferred level of involvement in local policy-making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00176-2openalex-snapshot
What drives process preferences? The role of perceived qualities of policymakers and party preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-024-00379-3openalex-snapshot
Beyond parliamentarism: How do citizens want to decide on divisive policies?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-025-00439-2openalex-snapshot
Do citizens approve of technocrats? Analyzing attitudes toward technocrats in thirty-one European democracies 1999–2021
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1581076openalex-snapshot
Explaining Support for Stealth Democracy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1530494openalex-snapshot
The personality of stealth democrats: how traits shape attitudes towards expert-based governments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2024.2323673openalex-snapshot
People’s preferred balance between politicians, citizens, and experts in policy-making decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2019.1576056openalex-snapshot
A scientific approach to measure public political participation in Pakistan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2019.1583329openalex-snapshot
Promoting or Controlling Political Decisions? Citizen Preferences for Direct-Democratic Institutions in Germany
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2021.1874935openalex-snapshot
The Nomination and Electoral Competitiveness of Working Class Candidates in Germany
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1963780openalex-snapshot
Party Cues and Pre-Campaign Attitudes: Voting Choice in Referendums in Eastern Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1819797openalex-snapshot
The good, the bad and the ugly: linking democratic values and participation in the Czech Republic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2031989openalex-snapshot
Weak agency and preferences for participatory democracy: discourses of Spanish people in positions of socioeconomic disadvantage
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1978284openalex-snapshot
Public support for deliberative democracy. A specific look at the attitudes of citizens from disadvantaged groups
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.2014630openalex-snapshot
Varieties of democratic understanding and political participation: multi-level evidence from the world
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2023.2296750openalex-snapshot
Do populists want direct democracy? Examining how thick and thin populist attitudes are associated with the Finnish Citizens’ Initiative
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2023.2297507openalex-snapshot
Cue-taking, populist attitudes, and support for holding a referendum: evidence from survey experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2026.2649023openalex-snapshot
Who should decide? A comparative study of citizens’ and politicians’ preferences for political decision-making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2025.2558651openalex-snapshot
Are citizens’ preferences for who should govern linked to their voting behaviour? The case of Italy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2023.2178187openalex-snapshot
When promises reach boundaries: political participation in post-communist countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1820703openalex-snapshot
Why people vote in local level referendums: comparing Germany and the United States
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/2474736x.2020.1809474openalex-snapshot
Support for direct and deliberative models of democracy in the UK: understanding the difference
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883319.003.0013openalex-snapshot
Democratic views and voting behavior
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-01-2022-0003openalex-snapshot
Middle-class people imagining democratic attitudes: the Pakistani experience
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12264openalex-snapshot
Youth support for direct versus talk‐centric democratic processes in Finland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.70041openalex-snapshot
People or Experts? A Study on Public Preferences for Participatory Democracy and Expert Governance in the Context of Climate Policymaking in Sweden
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/glob.70073openalex-snapshot
Who Should Rule for Cosmopolitans? Linking Cosmopolitan Orientations and Governance Preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12451openalex-snapshot
Populist Attitudes and Direct Democracy: A Questionable Relationship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211006.14openalex-snapshot
Research on Influencing Factors of College Students' Political Institutional Identity: Evidence from China
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211066213openalex-snapshot
Conceptualizing and Measuring Citizens’ Preferences for Democracy: Taking Stock of Three Decades of Research in a Fragmented Field
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718794358openalex-snapshot
The Role and the Future of Deliberative Mini-publics: A Citizen Perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251323406openalex-snapshot
Who Do People Prefer to Be in Charge? An In-Depth Analysis of UK Citizens’ Preferences for Politicians, Citizens, Experts, and/or Artificial Intelligence in Policymaking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719833628openalex-snapshot
Participatory Frustration: The Unintended Cultural Effect of Local Democratic Innovations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0263395717741799openalex-snapshot
The devil is in the detail: What do citizens mean when they support stealth or participatory democracy?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211050064openalex-snapshot
Who do the people want to govern?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231153932openalex-snapshot
Who do Europeans want to govern? Exploring the multiple dimensions of citizens’ preferences for political actors in nine European countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918807713openalex-snapshot
An Alternative to Representation: Explaining Preferences for Citizens as Political Decision-Makers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/14789299231197157openalex-snapshot
Why Do Politicians Not Act Upon Citizens’ Deliberations? Evidence From Iceland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2019-3-12-24openalex-snapshot
Interview with Alena Ledeneva: To Control a Level of Informality You Need the Targeted Therapy of Informal Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2019-3-136-163openalex-snapshot
The Effects of Social Network on Fertility: The Case of Large Families in Russia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2019-3-164-179openalex-snapshot
Nick Srnicek’s Platform Capitalism: Crisis — Response — Boom — Crisis — and Response Again. What Do We Know about the Digital Economy? Book Review: Srnicek N. (2019) Kapitalizm platform [Platform Capitalism] (Russian transl. by Maria Dobryakova), Moscow: HSE Publishing House (in Russian). 128 pp.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2019-3-180-184openalex-snapshot
Islamic Finance. XXth April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development, 09–12 April 2019, Moscow, Russia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2019-3-185-205openalex-snapshot
A Rejoinder to a Contemporary Non-Economist: A Comment on a Comment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2019-3-25-65openalex-snapshot
Social Factors of Contractor Selection on Freelance Online Marketplace: Study of Contests Using “Big Data”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2019-3-66-89openalex-snapshot
The Role of Family as a Channel of Intergenerational Transmission of Volunteer Traditions in Contemporary Russia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2019-3-99-135openalex-snapshot
, The Social Differences and Political Participation: The Mediating Effect of Ideological Position
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.11124openalex-snapshot
In the Pursuit of Democracy: Support for Referendums in Moldova
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8754openalex-snapshot
Limited Congruence: Citizens’ Attitudes and Party Rhetoric About Referendums and Deliberative Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1216openalex-snapshot
Don’t Good Democracies Need “Good” Citizens? Citizen Dispositions and the Study of Democratic Quality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2915openalex-snapshot
Disentangling How Populism and Radical Host Ideologies Shape Citizens’ Conceptions of Democratic Decision-Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17977/um019v5i2p213-225openalex-snapshot
Peningkatan Partisipasi Politik dalam Kerangka Otonomi Desa
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24252/profetik.v9i1a3openalex-snapshot
PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN DAN PEMBENTUKAN PREFERENSI POLITIK AWAL PEMILIH PEMULA
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26618/jed.v5i2.3440openalex-snapshot
The forms of Political Participation in General Elections by Beginner Voters
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/bmrxfopenalex-snapshot
Understandings of Democracy: New Norms and Participation in Changing Democracies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88971-901-3openalex-snapshot
Improving, Bypassing or Overcoming Representation?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2020.563351openalex-snapshot
Citizens' Contrasting Aspirations About Their Political System: Entrustment, Participation, Identification and Control
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2020.567297openalex-snapshot
Do Citizens Perceive Elected Politicians, Experts and Citizens as Alternative or Complementary Policy-Makers? A Study of Belgian Citizens
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su13137377openalex-snapshot
Deliberative Forms of Democracy and Intergenerational Sustainability Dilemma
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su131910518openalex-snapshot
Engaged, Indifferent, Skeptical or Critical? Disentangling Attitudes towards Local Deliberative Mini-Publics in Four Western European Democracies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3406/aijc.2021.2930openalex-snapshot
De l’opinion publique aux conceptions démocratiques : aller saisir l’imaginaire démocratique des citoyens
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3917/e.ripc.pr4.002openalex-snapshot
Reframing the debt crisis in defence of social democracy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3917/parti.026.0193openalex-snapshot
Rapport au système représentatif et soutien à la démocratie directe et délibérative. Analyse comparée des attitudes des élus nationaux en Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3917/parti.037.0153openalex-snapshot
L’imaginaire démocratique des élu·es et des gouvernant·es à l’épreuve d’une citoyenneté politique augmentée
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3917/ripc.pr4.002openalex-snapshot
Reframing the debt crisis in defence of social democracy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003297109openalex-snapshot
The Future of Self-Governing, Thriving Democracies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7202/1098868aropenalex-snapshot
Démocratiser le lien représentatif : une sociologie politique des citoyen·nes-contrôleur·euses
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.