On the public citation graph
Gross Concepts in Political Argument
0 signed · 61 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511625534.012openalex-snapshot
The idea of negative liberty: philosophical and historical perspectives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511720505.002openalex-snapshot
Virtues, rights, and manners: A model for historians of political thought
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511810152openalex-snapshot
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1057196openalex-snapshot
Adam Smith's Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1922171openalex-snapshot
The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1959094openalex-snapshot
Justice: John Rawls Vs. The Tradition of Political Philosophy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1960138openalex-snapshot
The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. By J. G. A. Pocock. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975. Pp. 602. $22.50, cloth; $11.50, paper.)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77b6zopenalex-snapshot
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7298/b0h5-mz05openalex-snapshot
Without Foundations: Justification in Political Theory
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91656-9_2openalex-snapshot
The Numerical Value of Democracy: League Tables, Scores and Trends
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.07.001openalex-snapshot
Theorising democracy geographically
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009551250.017openalex-snapshot
Essentially Contested Concepts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448openalex-snapshot
The Cambridge Companion to Isaiah Berlin
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.003openalex-snapshot
The Life and Opinions of Isaiah Berlin
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.004openalex-snapshot
Berlin, Analytic Philosophy, and the Revival of Political Philosophy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.005openalex-snapshot
“The Sense of Reality”: Berlin on Political Judgment, Political Ethics, and Leadership
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.006openalex-snapshot
Berlin on the Nature and Purpose of the History of Ideas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.007openalex-snapshot
Isaiah Berlin on Marx and Marxism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.008openalex-snapshot
Privileged Access: Isaiah Berlin and Russian Thought
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.009openalex-snapshot
Isaiah Berlin on the Enlightenment and Counter-Enlightenment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.010openalex-snapshot
Berlin’s Romantics and Their Ambiguous Legacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.011openalex-snapshot
Isaiah Berlin on Nationalism, the Modern Jewish Condition, and Zionism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.012openalex-snapshot
Negative Liberty and the Cold War
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.013openalex-snapshot
Isaiah Berlin: Contested Conceptions of Liberty and Liberalism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.014openalex-snapshot
Pluralism, Relativism, and Liberalism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.015openalex-snapshot
Liberalism, Nationalism, Pluralism: The Political Thought of Isaiah Berlin
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481448.019openalex-snapshot
Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511492174.002openalex-snapshot
Problems, methods, and theories in the study of politics, or: what's wrong with political science and what to do about it
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/ccol9780521513340.020openalex-snapshot
OTHER VOLUMES IN THE SERIES OF CAMBRIDGE COMPANIONS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409090261openalex-snapshot
Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592708080134openalex-snapshot
Postnational Rulemaking, Compliance, and Justification: The New Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00323269408402292openalex-snapshot
Conceptions of Australian political thought: A methodological critique
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2022.2056332openalex-snapshot
Beyond binary discourses on liberty: Constant's modern liberty, rightly understood
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08913819008459613openalex-snapshot
J. G. A. Pocock's republicanism and political theory: A critique and reinterpretation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.537openalex-snapshot
DEMOCRACY AND DICHOTOMIES: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11606/t.2.2020.tde-22032021-171232openalex-snapshot
Michael Sandel e os limites da justiça
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0090591702030004008openalex-snapshot
Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What's Wrong with Political Science and What to Do About it
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1470594x06068301openalex-snapshot
Does democratic deliberation change minds?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/27538796261424373openalex-snapshot
Beyond theory and into reality? The concept of environmental terrorism across state discourses on environmental destruction in armed conflicts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386421-004openalex-snapshot
Struggles over Kumaon’s Forests, 1815–1916
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386421-006openalex-snapshot
Governmentalized Localities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386421-007openalex-snapshot
Inside the Regulatory Community
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386421-008openalex-snapshot
Making Environmental Subjects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15760/etd.1943openalex-snapshot
Synthesizing the Vertical and the Horizontal: A World-Ecological Analysis of 'the Industrial Revolution', Part I
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3917/rdm.053.0291openalex-snapshot
« Pourquoi n’accueillez-vous pas des migrants chez vous ? » Définir le devoir d’hospitalité
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11666501openalex-snapshot
The Three Ages of Government: From the Person, to the Group, to the World
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.