On the public citation graph

Assessing the Validity of Job Ratings: An Empirical Study of False Reporting in Task Inventories

https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609502400404
0 signed · 20 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01013608openalex-snapshot
The value of relative-time-spent ratings in task-oriented job analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01013945openalex-snapshot
Evaluation of an index to detect inaccurate respondents to a task analysis inventory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.74.2.336openalex-snapshot
Determining important tasks within jobs: A policy-capturing approach.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.69.3.274openalex-snapshot
Effect of anonymity on student evaluations of faculty performance.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1969.tb00330.xopenalex-snapshot
EFFECT OF INSTRUCTIONAL CONDITIONS IN PRODUCING LENIENCY ON TWO TYPES OF RATING SCALES1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00952.xopenalex-snapshot
AN EVALUATION OF METHODS TO SELECT RESPONDENTS TO STRUCTURED JOB‐ANALYSIS QUESTIONNAIRES
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800311openalex-snapshot
Uninformed Response Error in Survey Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/014920637900500103openalex-snapshot
Mail Questionnaires in Survey Research: A Review of Response Inducement Techniques
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2522923openalex-snapshot
The Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1745055openalex-extracted
Computer Techniques for Analysis of Work (O * Net)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38720-4_3openalex-snapshot
Anforderungsanalyse – Wie Sie zu einem aussagekräftigen Anforderungsprofil kommen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000061openalex-snapshot
Rethinking Carelessness on Job Analysis Surveys
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.635openalex-snapshot
A meta-analysis of job analysis reliability.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/12170-001openalex-snapshot
Work analysis: From technique to theory.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/a0039084openalex-snapshot
Exploring factors that influence work analysis data: A meta-analysis of design choices, purposes, and organizational context.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb02457.xopenalex-snapshot
DEVELOPMENT OF A JOB ANALYSIS‐BASED PROCEDURE FOR WEIGHTING AND COMBINING CONTENT RELATED TESTS INTO A SINGLE TEST BATTERY SCORE
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00085.xopenalex-snapshot
CARELESSNESS AND DISCRIMINABILITY IN WORK ROLE REQUIREMENT JUDGMENTS: INFLUENCES OF ROLE AMBIGUITY AND COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100401openalex-snapshot
The Rise and Fall of Job Analysis and the Future of Work Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314522298openalex-snapshot
Pay Attention! The Liabilities of Respondent Experience and Carelessness When Making Job Analysis Judgments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1518/001872005774860087openalex-snapshot
Team Task Analysis: Identifying Tasks and Jobs That Are Team Based
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.