On the public citation graph

The Politics of Talk

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706053350

0 signed · 631 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8openalex-snapshot

Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-9327(87)90171-2openalex-snapshot

Science speaks to power. The role of experts in policymaking

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511563737openalex-snapshot

Misunderstanding Science?

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/b:mine.0000017699.19747.f0openalex-snapshot

The Public Understanding of Science and Public Participation in Regulated Worlds

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/301openalex-snapshot

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.00426openalex-snapshot

New Wine, Old Bottles? Personal Reflections on the New Biotechnology Commissions

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392102050003010openalex-snapshot

Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out?

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018303023002005openalex-snapshot

Rights and Responsibilities in the New Genetics Era

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/026327690007002010openalex-snapshot

Modernity and Ambivalence

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003openalex-snapshot

The Third Wave of Science Studies

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333004openalex-snapshot

Breaking the Waves in Science Studies

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333005openalex-snapshot

Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367812546openalex-snapshot

Setting Environmental Standards

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1318589openalex-snapshot

Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2072218openalex-snapshot

The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2075516openalex-snapshot

Modernity and Ambivalence.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/591331openalex-snapshot

The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organisation

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3109/13645709209152932openalex-snapshot

New wine - old bottles

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3109/a036852openalex-snapshot

Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203021613openalex-snapshot

Sociology Beyond Societies

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6594710openalex-extracted

Smell Pittsburgh: Engaging Community Citizen Science for Air Quality

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0005862.pub2openalex-snapshot

Public Understanding of Genetics: The Deficit Model

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0005862.pub3openalex-snapshot

Public Understanding of Genetics: The Deficit Model

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0005863.pub2openalex-snapshot

Genetic Futures and the Media

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0005863.pub3openalex-snapshot

Genetic Futures and the Media

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0005865.pub2openalex-snapshot

Public and Professional Understandings of Genetics

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch13openalex-snapshot

Visions, Hype, and Expectations: A Place for Responsibility

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch5openalex-snapshot

Responsible Innovation – Opening Up Dialogue and Debate

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118997635.ch7openalex-snapshot

A Surfeit of Disease

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781119616290.ch11openalex-snapshot

Autonomy and Energy Community: Realities to Reconsider?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781119962748.ch6openalex-snapshot

Governing Risky Technologies

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781394165452.refsopenalex-snapshot

References

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosg032.pub2openalex-snapshot

Genetic Engineering as a Social Problem

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9783527634798.ch15openalex-snapshot

Public Engagement with Emerging Issues in Agri‐Food Nanotechnology

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700076openalex-snapshot

Situating Expertise: Lessons from the HIV/AIDS Epidemic

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10152openalex-snapshot

Mechanisms for enhancing public engagement with citizen science results

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10285openalex-snapshot

Giving stakeholders a voice in governance: Biodiversity priorities for New Zealand's agriculture

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.570openalex-snapshot

Relationship‐building between climate scientists and publics as an alternative to information transfer

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_15openalex-snapshot

In Search of Dialogue: Staging Science Communication in Consensus Conferences

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_130openalex-snapshot

GM Crop Risk Debate, Science and Socioeconomics

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_130openalex-snapshot

GM Crop Risk Debate, Science and Socioeconomics

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_239openalex-snapshot

Genetic Engineering of Crops for Insect Resistance

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26784-1_2openalex-snapshot

Knowledge for Fisheries Governance: Participation, Integration and Institutional Reform

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53258-1_9openalex-snapshot

Which Types of Knower Should Democracies Include and Why?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61728-8_10openalex-snapshot

Performing Science in Public: Science Communication and Scientific Identity

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91597-1_5openalex-snapshot

Models of Science Policy: From the Linear Model to Responsible Research and Innovation

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33177-0openalex-snapshot

Ethics and Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33177-0_2openalex-snapshot

The ETHNA System and Support Tools

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57019-3_2openalex-snapshot

Responsible Innovation

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60974-9_1openalex-snapshot

What Is That Thing Called ‘Transdisciplinarity for Transformation’?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8openalex-snapshot

Opening Science

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2openalex-snapshot

Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15353-7_5openalex-snapshot

Public Participation in Decision-Making on Energy Policy: The Case of the “National Discussion” After the Fukushima Accident

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_3openalex-snapshot

Responsible Innovation in the US, UK and Denmark: Governance Landscapes

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25658-0_14openalex-snapshot

Getting Out of Their Way: Do-It-Yourselfers, Sensing, and Self-Reliance

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32240-7_3openalex-snapshot

Participation and Trust: Conditions and Constraints on Democratic Deliberation

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32240-7_7openalex-snapshot

Public Engagement and Deliberation in Human Embryo Research Governance in Australia 2001–2011

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32414-2_2openalex-snapshot

‘The Public Spectre’: A Critical Concept of Public Engagement with Technology

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58365-5_2openalex-snapshot

Linking the Subcultures of Physics: Virtual Empiricism and the Bonding Role of Trust

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18961-1_12openalex-snapshot

Können Kommunikationsprobleme zwischen Managementwissenschaftlern und Praktikern in gemeinsamen Forschungsprojekten überwunden werden?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92647-6_3openalex-snapshot

Experimente partizipativer ELSA-Forschung

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77568-3_18openalex-snapshot

Knowledge for Corporate Energy Management - Structural Contradictions and Hope for Change?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77568-3_20openalex-snapshot

Visualising Nuclear Landscapes: Visual Simulation in the Licensing for Finnish Nuclear Facilities

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27107-7_16openalex-snapshot

Stakeholder Experience

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1405-6_12openalex-snapshot

Governing by dialogue

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1405-6_5openalex-snapshot

Regulierungskulturen und -strategien der Nanotechnologie in Deutschland, Österreich, der Schweiz und der Europäischen Union

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-86226-481-0_2openalex-snapshot

Leben in Nanowelten: Zur Ko-Produktion von Nano und Gesellschaft

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2834-1_11openalex-snapshot

Why Enrol Citizens in the Governance of Nanotechnology?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2834-1_15openalex-snapshot

The Time of Science: Deliberation and the “New Governance” of Nanotechnology

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8730-0openalex-snapshot

Environmental sociology : European perspectives and interdisciplinary challenges

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8730-0_10openalex-snapshot

Environmental Knowledge and Deliberative Democracy

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_21openalex-snapshot

Conditions of Science: The Three-Way Tension of Freedom, Accountability and Utility

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9615-9_7openalex-snapshot

Nanotechnology and the Extension and Transformation of Inequity

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0929-4_447openalex-snapshot

Ethics in Food and Agricultural Sciences

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_40openalex-snapshot

Sociology of Risk

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_12openalex-snapshot

Campaigns and Coalitions: Governance by Media

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5455-3_4openalex-snapshot

Sociology of Risk

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_447-1openalex-snapshot

Role of Food and Agricultural Sciences in Society, Ethics

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_447openalex-snapshot

Ethics in Food and Agricultural Sciences

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-738-2_4openalex-snapshot

Motivating Engagement

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4859-8_15openalex-snapshot

Deep and Meaningful: An Iterative Approach to Developing an Authentic Narrative for Public Engagement for Plant Molecular Technologies in Human and Animal Health

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6540-3_5openalex-snapshot

Operationalizing the Use of Existing Data in Support of Biomedical Research and Innovation: An Inclusive and Sustainable Approach

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9172-7openalex-snapshot

The once and future georgic: agricultural practice, environmental knowledge, and the place for an ethic of experience

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-10012-9openalex-snapshot

Technocratic and deliberative governance for sustainability: rethinking the roles of experts, consumers, and producers

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03659-1openalex-snapshot

Experts and expertise in practices of citizen engagement in climate policy: a comparative analysis of two contrasting cases

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02564-4openalex-snapshot

Academia and society in collaborative knowledge production towards urban sustainability: several schemes—three common crossroads

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9496-8openalex-snapshot

Redacted in Nebraska: the noises of conspiracy around nuclear power problems

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9631-yopenalex-snapshot

Research staff and public engagement: a UK study

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9057-6openalex-snapshot

Ethics in the Societal Debate on Genetically Modified Organisms: A (Re)Quest for Sense and Sensibility

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9117-6openalex-snapshot

Opening Up for Participation in Agro-Biodiversity Conservation: The Expert-Lay Interplay in a Brazilian Social Movement

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9358-7openalex-snapshot

Taming the Unruly Side of Ethics: Overcoming Challenges of a Bottom-Up Approach to Ethics in the Areas of Food Policy and Climate Change

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01274-yopenalex-snapshot

Finding shared solutions in landscape or natural resource management through social learning: A quasi-experimental evaluation in an Alpine region

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9321-4openalex-snapshot

The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9810-1openalex-snapshot

Public trust and ‘ethics review’ as a commodity: the case of Genomics England Limited and the UK’s 100,000 genomes project

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9155-xopenalex-snapshot

Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-scribing Publics in Public Engagement

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9157-8openalex-snapshot

Participation as Post-Fordist Politics: Demos, New Labour, and Science Policy

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9160-0openalex-snapshot

Mediating Science and Society in the EU and UK: From Information-Transmission to Deliberative Democracy?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9199-1openalex-snapshot

Experiments in Science Policy: An Autobiographical Note

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9201-yopenalex-snapshot

A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9234-xopenalex-snapshot

De-Facto Science Policy in the Making: How Scientists Shape Science Policy and Why it Matters (or, Why STS and STP Scholars Should Socialize)

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09405-6openalex-snapshot

From Deliberation to Production: Public Participation in Science and Technology Policies of the European Commission (1998–2019)

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09551-1openalex-snapshot

What is “Dialogue” in Public Engagement with Science and Technology? Bridging STS and Deliberative Democracy

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-010-9120-4openalex-snapshot

Technology assessment in Australia: the case for a formal agency to improve advice to policy makers

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9407-5openalex-snapshot

Distributing Obligations, Performing Publics: Responsible Citizens in Post-Disaster Engagement

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9817-5openalex-snapshot

The Nature of Science and Citizenship: a Delphi Analysis

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-013-9754-zopenalex-snapshot

Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-007-0014-7openalex-snapshot

On Nanotechnology and Ambivalence: The Politics of Enthusiasm

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-007-0017-4openalex-snapshot

The Laboratory Revisited

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-008-0043-xopenalex-snapshot

Lose One Another ... and Find One Another in Nanospace. ‘Nanotechnologies for Tomorrow’s Society: A Case for Reflective Action Research in Flanders (NanoSoc)’

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-009-0070-2openalex-snapshot

Community Engagement to Facilitate, Legitimize and Accelerate the Advancement of Nanotechnologies in Australia

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-010-0096-5openalex-snapshot

Narratives of Mastery and Resistance: Lay Ethics of Nanotechnology

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-012-0159-xopenalex-snapshot

Strong Will in a Messy World. Ethics and the Government of Technoscience

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-012-0162-2openalex-snapshot

Integrating and Enacting ‘Social and Ethical Issues’ in Nanotechnology Practices

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-014-0200-3openalex-snapshot

Cultures and Strategies in the Regulation of Nanotechnology in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and the European Union

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-018-0316-yopenalex-snapshot

Models of Public Engagement: Nanoscientists’ Understandings of Science–Society Interactions

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-021-00394-8openalex-snapshot

Juggling Roles, Experiencing Dilemmas: The Challenges of SSH Scholars in Public Engagement

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-011-0024-0openalex-snapshot

Der Laie im Fokus nuklearer Debatten

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9089-yopenalex-snapshot

Avoiding Empty Rhetoric: Engaging Publics in Debates About Nanotechnologies

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9173-yopenalex-snapshot

Risk and Responsibility in a Manufactured World

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9303-1openalex-snapshot

Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9306-yopenalex-snapshot

Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9312-0openalex-snapshot

Publics in the Making: Mediating Different Methods of Engagement and the Publics These Construct

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9331-xopenalex-snapshot

Editorial Overview

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9660-2openalex-snapshot

Creating Inquiry Between Technology Developers and Civil Society Actors: Learning from Experiences Around Nanotechnology

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0064-yopenalex-snapshot

An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00199-0openalex-snapshot

Creating ‘Local Publics’: Responsibility and Involvement in Decision-Making on Technologies with Local Impacts

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00208-2openalex-snapshot

Transforming Scientists’ Understanding of Science–Society Relations. Stimulating Double-Loop Learning when Teaching RRI

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12280-007-9001-xopenalex-snapshot

European Public Participation as Risk Governance: Enhancing Democratic Accountability for Agbiotech Policy?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12280-007-9002-9openalex-snapshot

Social Decision-Making Processes in Local Contexts: An STS Case Study on Nuclear Power Plant Siting in Japan

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12280-007-9004-7openalex-snapshot

Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political–Conceptual Category Mistake

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12280-009-9068-7openalex-snapshot

Problematizing the Experts: The One-Dimensional Engineering Understanding of the Users and Its Contextual Frameworks

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12280-010-9120-7openalex-snapshot

Theoretical Challenges for the Current Sociology of Science and Technology: A Prospect for Its Future Development

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-025-02625-9openalex-snapshot

Boundary Competition and Co-production in Clean Energy Issues: Revisiting the Scientific Process and the Politics of Knowledge Through the Lens of STS

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00443-3openalex-snapshot

Postdigital Citizen Science: Mapping the Field

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-025-4071-9openalex-snapshot

Megaproject responsible innovation: Concept, framework, and governance

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.85055-2openalex-snapshot

Science, Public Engagement with

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-373932-2.00017-xopenalex-snapshot

Public Engagement in Science and Technology

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-374396-1.00145-8openalex-snapshot

Nanotechnology, Society, and Environment

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.10311-xopenalex-snapshot

Nanotechnology, Society, and Environment ☆

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.016openalex-snapshot

Atmospheric composition change research: Time to go post-normal?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.012openalex-snapshot

Citizen engagement and urban change: Three case studies of material deliberation

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.12.017openalex-snapshot

A risk to a right? Beyond data protection risk assessments

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.011openalex-snapshot

Bio-basing society by including emotions

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101380openalex-snapshot

Piloting a more inclusive governance innovation strategy for forest ecosystem services management in Primiero, Italy

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101482openalex-snapshot

Guiding the guides: Doing ‘Constructive Innovation Assessment’ as part of innovating forest ecosystem service governance

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.03.002openalex-snapshot

Trust gaps in energy transitions: Japan’s National Deliberative Poll after Fukushima

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.002openalex-snapshot

Participatory governance for energy policy-making: A case study of the UK nuclear consultation in 2007

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103940openalex-snapshot

Questionable devices: Applying a large language model to deliberate carbon removal

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.04.003openalex-snapshot

Hybrid forums, knowledge deficits and the multiple uncertainties of resource extraction: Negotiating the local governance of shale gas in Poland

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.008openalex-snapshot

Energy democracy in a continuum: Remaking public engagement on energy transitions in Thailand

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.020openalex-snapshot

Ecologies of participation in socio-technical change: The case of energy system transitions

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102164openalex-snapshot

Are rapid and inclusive energy and climate transitions oxymorons? Towards principles of responsible acceleration

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102796openalex-snapshot

‘Going through the dance steps’: Instrumentality, frustration and performativity in processes of formal public participation in decision-making on shale development in the United Kingdom

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102157openalex-snapshot

Civil society stakeholder views on forensic DNA phenotyping: Balancing risks and benefits

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.08.011openalex-snapshot

Urban sustainability and knowledge: Theoretical heterogeneity and the need of a transdisciplinary framework. A tale of four towns

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.05.008openalex-snapshot

The role of biosolar technologies in future energy supply making scenarios for the Netherlands: Energy port and energy farm

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2026.103852openalex-snapshot

Agency and directionality in circular futures: Evidence from a serious game–based scenario exploration

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.09.008openalex-snapshot

Looking North and South: Ideals and realities of inclusive environmental governance

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.002openalex-snapshot

Making a reservoir: Heterogeneous engineering on the Kemi River in Finnish Lapland

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.008openalex-snapshot

Living the global social experiment: An analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.01.007openalex-snapshot

Adaptive and risk-based approaches to climate change and the management of uncertainty and institutional risk: The case of future flooding in England

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.001openalex-snapshot

Fulfilling the promise of participation by not resuscitating the deficit model

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101365openalex-snapshot

Mapping the knowledge development and frontier areas of public risk governance research

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.07.002openalex-snapshot

Individual differences in interpersonal touch: On the development, validation, and use of the “comfort with interpersonal touch” (CIT) scale

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.006openalex-snapshot

How do potential knowledge users evaluate new claims about a contested resource? Problems of power and politics in knowledge exchange and mobilization

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100140openalex-snapshot

Beyond social acceptance in wicked problems: A socio-ethical assessment framework for technology governance

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.03.004openalex-snapshot

Place-keeping in action: Evaluating the capacity of green space partnerships in England

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.004openalex-snapshot

The science of interpersonal touch: An overview

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.037openalex-snapshot

Affective touch: A meta-analysis on sex differences

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.037openalex-snapshot

3D Hand-Motion Tracking and Bottom-Up Classification Sheds Light on the Physical Properties of Gentle Stroking

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100281openalex-snapshot

Public involvement and public engagement: An example of convergent evolution? Findings from a conceptual qualitative review of patient and public involvement, and public engagement, in health and scientific research

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.05.006openalex-snapshot

Touch between romantic partners: Being stroked is more pleasant than stroking and decelerates heart rate

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.04.005openalex-snapshot

Situated knowledge–situated legitimacy: Consequences of citizen participation in local environmental governance

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.10.001openalex-snapshot

Beyond the ‘embryo question’: human embryonic stem cell ethics in the context of biomaterial donation in the UK

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.015openalex-snapshot

Stakeholder interaction within research consortia on emerging technologies: Learning how and what?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008openalex-snapshot

Developing a framework for responsible innovation

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011openalex-snapshot

Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.015openalex-snapshot

Challenging the “deficit model” of innovation: Framing policy issues under the innovation imperative

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.006openalex-snapshot

The tentative governance of emerging science and technology—A conceptual introduction

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.009openalex-snapshot

Beyond the limits to governance: New rules of engagement for the tentative governance of the life sciences

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103971openalex-snapshot

The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104132openalex-snapshot

Organisational institutionalisation of responsible innovation

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.035openalex-snapshot

Using residents' worries about technology as a way of resolving environmental remediation dilemmas

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.133openalex-snapshot

Factors influencing residents' acceptance (support) of remediation technologies

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.12.009openalex-snapshot

Critiquing imaginaries of ‘the public’ in UK dialogue around animal research: Insights from the Mass Observation Project

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.053openalex-snapshot

An innovative participatory method for newly democratic societies: The “civic groups forum” on national health insurance reform in Taiwan

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.023openalex-snapshot

The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.030openalex-snapshot

Citizens, publics, others and their role in participatory processes: A commentary on Lehoux, Daudelin and Abelson

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.049openalex-snapshot

Governing the moral economy: Animal engineering, ethics and the liberal government of science

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.009openalex-snapshot

Which public and why deliberate? – A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.033openalex-snapshot

Exploring the meaning of pro-vaccine activism across two countries

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112674openalex-snapshot

Questions regarding ‘epistemic injustice’ in knowledge-intensive policymaking: Two examples from Dutch health insurance policy

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116307openalex-snapshot

Participation through the lens of care: Situated accountabilities in the codesign of a digital health platform for HIV care

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2014.08.009openalex-snapshot

The influence of social movements on space astronomy policy

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.07.005openalex-snapshot

Framing public engagement: A critical discourse analysis of GM Nation?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.034openalex-snapshot

Scenario planning as communicative action: Lessons from participatory exercises conducted for the Scottish livestock industry

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120518openalex-snapshot

Social innovation governance and the role of universities: Cases of quadruple helix partnerships in Italy

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.07.008openalex-snapshot

Envisioning nanotechnology: New media and future-oriented stakeholder dialogue

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.07.003openalex-snapshot

The governance of nanotechnology in the Brazilian context: Entangling approaches

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.03.001openalex-snapshot

Broadening the lens for the governance of emerging technologies: Care ethics and agricultural biotechnology

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101148openalex-snapshot

Emerging patterns in the academic literature on responsible research and innovation

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101475openalex-snapshot

Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101666openalex-snapshot

In pursuit of socially-minded data-intensive innovation in banking: A focus group study of public expectations of digital innovation in banking

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.09.005openalex-snapshot

Defining place-keeping: The long-term management of public spaces

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s1449-4035(06)70078-9openalex-snapshot

Inside Deliberative Experiments: Dynamics of Subjectivity in Science Policy Deliberations

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108554510.024openalex-snapshot

The Paradox of Public Knowledge in Environmental Sociology

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108620024.013openalex-snapshot

Tools, Processes and Actors

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108620024.015openalex-snapshot

Forms of Engagement

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108871044openalex-snapshot

The Making of Responsible Innovation

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781139680714.013openalex-snapshot

Reframing Public Health Governance: From Risk to Citizenship and Participation

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316418369.018openalex-snapshot

The Sociology of Science and Technology

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511760228openalex-snapshot

Successful Science Communication

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511760228.004openalex-snapshot

Deficits and dialogues: science communication and the public understanding of science in the UK

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139875981.016openalex-snapshot

The inescapability of knowing and inability to not know in the digital society

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279420000215openalex-snapshot

Open Policy Making in the UK – to Whom Might Policy Formulation be ‘Opening Up’?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s004727942100012xopenalex-snapshot

Governing Researchers through Public Involvement

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1479244311000503openalex-snapshot

RISE,GRUBENHUND: ON PROVINCIALIZING KUHN

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1745855209006413openalex-snapshot

Who's Credible? Expressions of Consensus and Conflict in Focus Groups about DNA Patenting

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1867299x00001884openalex-snapshot

Regulating Nanotechnologies by Dialogue

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.43openalex-snapshot

Societal dialogue needs more than public engagement

showing the first 200 of 611

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.