On the public citation graph

Trust and regulatory organisations: The role of local knowledge and facework in research ethics review

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712446364
0 signed · 130 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1975.03260100083033openalex-snapshot
Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation: A Sociological Study of the Conduct and Regulation of Clinical Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-005-9004-yopenalex-snapshot
Punctuated Equilibrium, Moral Panics and the Ethics Review Process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-008-9155-xopenalex-snapshot
The politics and bio-ethics of regulatory trust: case-studies of pharmaceuticals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-7222-1.50005-2openalex-snapshot
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.08.004openalex-snapshot
Rationalising public participation in the health service: the case of research ethics committees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.046openalex-snapshot
Written work: The social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.008openalex-snapshot
Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-8819(25)00015-7openalex-snapshot
Ethical Review of Multi-Centre Research: A Survey of Local Reseach Ethics Committees in the South Thames Region
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-8819(25)00043-1openalex-snapshot
Local Research Ethics Committees' Approval in a National Population Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-8819(25)02641-8openalex-snapshot
Research Ethical Committees in 1981
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92653-3openalex-snapshot
RESEARCH ETHICAL COMMITTEES
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511550089.030openalex-snapshot
Governance arrangements for NHS research ethics committees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975605000160openalex-snapshot
Trust as an Action
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025727300000211openalex-snapshot
“A Form of Practical Machinery”: The Origins of Research Ethics Committees in the UK, 1967–1972
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/435737aopenalex-snapshot
Scientists behaving badly
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840500294367openalex-snapshot
Trust and risk in a German chemical town
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620600588944openalex-snapshot
Centralized and Non-Centralized Ethics Review: A Five Nation Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570903180455openalex-snapshot
The phenomenology of trust: A Schutzian analysis of the social construction of knowledge by gynae-oncology patients
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/228943openalex-snapshot
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198296034.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The Audit Society
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muj020openalex-snapshot
"Then Let's Have a Dialogue": Interdependence and Negotiation in a Cohesive Regulatory System
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcg060openalex-snapshot
The ethical bureaucracy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/15.1.109openalex-snapshot
The Old Faith and the New Science: The Nuremberg Code and Human Experimentation Ethics in Britain, 1946-73
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-197707000-00018openalex-snapshot
Local Institutional Review Boards
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00751.xopenalex-snapshot
The Civilizing Process of Trust: Developing Quality Mechanisms which are Local, Professional‐led and thus Legitimate
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01303.xopenalex-snapshot
Trust and technology: the social foundations of aviation regulation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00210.xopenalex-snapshot
Trust between Regulators and the Regulated: A Case Study of Environmental Inspectors and Facility Personnel in Virginia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.282.6265.718openalex-snapshot
Research ethical committees in Scotland.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.297.6650.738openalex-snapshot
Myocardial infarction on holiday.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.297.6651.753openalex-snapshot
News
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6847.257-bopenalex-snapshot
Local and central research ethics committees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7019.1572aopenalex-snapshot
Differences in application process cause problems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1182openalex-snapshot
Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7432.140openalex-snapshot
Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study: Table 1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1732openalex-snapshot
Regulation--the real threat to clinical research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.56.4.268openalex-snapshot
Down’s syndrome screening is unethical: views of today’s research ethics committees: Table 1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.18.1.43openalex-snapshot
Ethics and ethics committees: HIV serosurveillance in Scotland.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.004051openalex-snapshot
What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.014159openalex-snapshot
Consistency in decision making by research ethics committees: a controlled comparison: Table 1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2003.009001openalex-snapshot
Public trust in health care: the system or the doctor?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.022756openalex-snapshot
An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.7.3.159openalex-snapshot
Trust in performance indicators?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689208500206openalex-snapshot
Fate of Research Studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031001004openalex-snapshot
Tacit Knowledge, Trust and the Q of Sapphire
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610800400204openalex-snapshot
Does Researchers' Attendance at Meetings Affect the Initial Opinions of Research Ethics Committees?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1404_6openalex-snapshot
Ethics Review of Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research: Where Should We Go From Here?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.91.12814openalex-snapshot
Trust as an Organizing Principle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0100openalex-snapshot
The Complexity of Trust-Control Relationships in Creative Organizations: Insights From a Qualitative Analysis of a Conductorless Orchestra
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.43openalex-snapshot
Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2009.4.1.63openalex-snapshot
Anonymous Self-Evaluation of Performance by Ethics Board Members: A Pilot Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1972655openalex-snapshot
The F-Connection: Families, Friends, and Firms and the Organization of Exchange
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2061983openalex-snapshot
Research on Human Subjects: Problems of Social Control in Medical Experimentation.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2064031openalex-snapshot
The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2234217openalex-snapshot
Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/256729openalex-snapshot
DOES FAMILIARITY BREED TRUST? THE IMPLICATIONS OF REPEATED TIES FOR CONTRACTUAL CHOICE IN ALLIANCES.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2576213openalex-snapshot
Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation: A Sociological Study of the Conduct and Regulation of Clinical Research.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2577719openalex-snapshot
Deviance and Social Change.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203449721openalex-snapshot
Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617openalex-snapshot
Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926618openalex-snapshot
Straining for Shared Meaning in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5812/jmeopenalex-snapshot
Journal of Medical Education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-1843openalex-snapshot
The consequences of modernity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-3361openalex-snapshot
Society's choices: social and ethical decision making in biomedicine
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-3949openalex-snapshot
Deciding together: bioethics and moral consensus
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226113623.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Rethinking Expertise
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001openalex-snapshot
A Social History of Truth

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2644674openalex-extracted
Power Elites’ Interests and Biased Social Science: 64 Years of Telling Kibbutz Half Truth
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2644687openalex-extracted
Power Elitess Interests and Biased Social Science: 64 Years of Telling Kibbutz Half Truths
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3105254openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0027019openalex-snapshot
Bioethics: The View from Social Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118430873.est0031openalex-snapshot
Bioethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26825-1_240-1openalex-snapshot
A Brief History of Research Ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12692-5_14openalex-snapshot
How Risky Can Biomedical Research Be?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58365-5_1openalex-snapshot
Introduction: Intercultural Communication and Science and Technology Studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58365-5_2openalex-snapshot
Linking the Subcultures of Physics: Virtual Empiricism and the Bonding Role of Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73435-4_3openalex-snapshot
Good Luck with the Research That Will End Your Career
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73435-4_5openalex-snapshot
Preventing, Regulating, and Punishing Research Misconduct: Myth or Reality?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74721-7_28openalex-snapshot
Traversing Ethical Imperatives: Learning from Stories from the Field
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9573-9_18openalex-snapshot
Making Researchers Moral
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2450-5_6openalex-snapshot
Conducting Qualitative Research in/on Health Systems: Ethical Tensions, Confounders, and Silences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_33openalex-snapshot
Committee Work: Stem Cell Governance in the United States
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-025-10280-9openalex-snapshot
REC review of deceptive studies: diversifying guidance for diverse review needs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09368-3openalex-snapshot
The Ethics Ecosystem: Personal Ethics, Network Governance and Regulating Actors Governing the Use of Social Media Research Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.043openalex-snapshot
Ethical review: Standardizing procedures and local shaping of ethical review practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.013openalex-snapshot
Justification and authority in institutional review board decision letters
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112980openalex-snapshot
Writing to template: Researchers’ negotiation of procedural research ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.75openalex-snapshot
Enhancing Reciprocity, Equity and Quality of Ethics Review for Multisite Research During Public Health Crises: The Experience of the COVID-19 Clinical Research Coalition Ethics Working Group
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-01015-1openalex-snapshot
Reconciling fragmented sectors of health research regulation: toward an ecosystem of processual regulation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2015.1028584openalex-snapshot
Examining uncertainty and trust among irrigators and regulatory bodies in the Murray-Darling Basin
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2024.2393571openalex-snapshot
A Quest for State Contracts: Public Procurement and the Shaping of Competitiveness in Development Consulting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.891944openalex-snapshot
Medical Dominance within Research Ethics Committees
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2018.1537790openalex-snapshot
'Text-work' in Research Ethics Review: The significance of documents in and beyond committee meetings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1688780openalex-snapshot
Somatic Vigilance and Sonic Skills in Experimental Plasma Physics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew038openalex-snapshot
Facework: creating trust in systems, institutions and organisations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1163/9789004355972_008openalex-snapshot
The Swedish Ban on Corporal Punishment of Children in a Multi-Cultural Context – Conflicting Logics in the Social Services
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515590756openalex-snapshot
Reputational Risk, Academic Freedom and Research Ethics Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00943061211021083aopenalex-snapshot
What Is Compliance? How Audits Change Ethics and Organizational Fields
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915624144openalex-snapshot
Ethics Expertise and Public Credibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/01622439241276262openalex-snapshot
Infrastructuring Readability: Framing and Overflowing in Writing Assistant Software for Biomedical Research Informed Consent Forms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713506141openalex-snapshot
A deviation from standard design? Clinical trials, research ethics committees, and the regulatory co-construction of organizational deviance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714539058openalex-snapshot
Linking the subcultures of physics: Virtual empiricism and the bonding role of trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715609699openalex-snapshot
Trust, regulatory processes and NICE decision-making: Appraising cost-effectiveness models through appraising people and systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715615970openalex-snapshot
The value of practice: A critique of interactional expertise
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715619784openalex-snapshot
Controlled human malaria infection trials: How tandems of trust and control construct scientific knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718824663openalex-snapshot
Under repair: A publication ethics and research record in the making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719846557openalex-snapshot
Impossible, unknowable, accountable: Dramas and dilemmas of data law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221085241openalex-snapshot
Making particularity travel: Trust and citizen science data in Swedish environmental governance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/03063127231162082openalex-snapshot
Mistrust: Community engagement in global health research in coastal Kenya
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/03063127261461548openalex-snapshot
Reframing Trust in Citizen Science: Comparative Insights From Two German Initiatives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0907568218769365openalex-snapshot
Researching disabled children and young people’s views on decision-making: Working reflexively to rethink vulnerability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/09697330211003252openalex-snapshot
Ethics review, reflective equilibrium and reflexivity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1466138120983862openalex-snapshot
Research ethics committees, ethnographers and imaginations of risk
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617717827openalex-snapshot
Factors Influencing IACUC Decision Making: Who Leads the Discussions?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241237549openalex-snapshot
In Pursuit of Ethical and Inclusive Research: What Ethics Committees and Disability Researchers Can Learn From Each Other
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1747016113504778openalex-snapshot
Making researchers moral: Why trustworthiness requires more than ethics guidelines and review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1747016113510654openalex-snapshot
Between the accountable and the auditable: Ethics and ethical governance in the social sciences SchragZachary M, Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009. USA: Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.StarkLaura, Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and…
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241240594openalex-snapshot
The development and evolution of ethics review boards – Israel as a case study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0224-7openalex-snapshot
Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0339-5openalex-snapshot
Research approvals iceberg: how a ‘low-key’ study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00653-zopenalex-snapshot
How ethics committees and requirements are structuring health research in the Philippines: a qualitative study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2563-1openalex-snapshot
Multiple-level stakeholder engagement in malaria clinical trials: addressing the challenges of conducting clinical research in resource-limited settings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.20161.40804openalex-snapshot
Expertise and the Fractal Model: Communication and Collaboration between Climate-Change Scientists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.81openalex-snapshot
Decisions of Value: Going Backstage Comment on "Contextual Factors Influencing Cost and Quality Decisions in Health and Care: A Structured Evidence Review and Narrative Synthesis"
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20221011msopenalex-snapshot
Ethics in action
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3917/gap.251.0033openalex-snapshot
Accompagner ou limiter la bureaucratisation de la recherche ?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3917/rac.043.0503openalex-snapshot
Observer l’éthique en train de se faire pour une approche pragmatique des commissions d’éthique de la recherche
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4000/rac.22194openalex-snapshot
Tentatives de clôture d’une controverse scientifique au sein d’un laboratoire
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2016.46003openalex-snapshot
Co-Opted Biased Social Science: 64 Years of Telling Half Truths about the Kibbutz
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.51847/mnlgjhrvkfopenalex-snapshot
The Role of Ethics Committees and Regulatory Requirements in Shaping Health Research in the Philippines: A Qualitative Investigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14897425openalex-snapshot
Additional file 1 of How ethics committees and requirements are structuring health research in the Philippines: a qualitative study
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.