On the public citation graph
Who is Better at Defending Criminals? Does Type of Defense Attorney Matter in Terms of Producing Favorable Case Outcomes
0 signed · 98 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-006-9010-2openalex-snapshot
Does Gender Modify the Effects of Race–ethnicity on Criminal Sanctioning? Sentences for Male and Female White, Black, and Hispanic Defendants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-006-9023-xopenalex-snapshot
Measuring and Explaining Charge Bargaining
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(89)90031-7openalex-snapshot
Private counsels and public defenders: A look at weak cases, prior records, and leniency in plea bargaining
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(93)90048-ropenalex-snapshot
The craft of justice: Politics and work in criminal court communities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2009.09.005openalex-snapshot
Does the type of criminal defense counsel affect case outcomes?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.009openalex-snapshot
Do you get what you pay for? Type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024827807469openalex-snapshot
A comparison of retained and appointed counsel in cases of capital murder.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/e506752011-001openalex-snapshot
Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2006
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2002.10767668openalex-snapshot
A Comparison of Sentencing Outcomes for Defendants with Public Defenders Versus Retained Counsel in a Florida Circuit Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829300092041openalex-snapshot
Counsel for the poor: An evaluation of contracting for indigent criminal defense
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829500096151openalex-snapshot
Age differences in sentencing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/23277556.1991.10871136openalex-snapshot
Privatizing Due Process: Issues in the Comparison of Assigned Counsel, Public Defender, and Contracted Indigent Defense Systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00255.xopenalex-snapshot
Ethnicity Effects on Sentence Outcomes in Large Urban Courts: Comparisons Among White, Black, and Hispanic Defendants *
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885504265077openalex-snapshot
Explaining Sentence Severity in Large Urban Counties: A Multilevel Analysis of Contextual and Case-Level Factors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1839651openalex-snapshot
Explaining the Outcome Gap between Different Types of Indigent Defense Counsel: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard Effects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1143772openalex-snapshot
The Tenor of Justice: Criminal Courts and the Guilty Plea Process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1192166openalex-snapshot
Indigent Defense Systems in the United States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1288075openalex-snapshot
The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352openalex-snapshot
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2095230openalex-snapshot
An Introduction to Sample Selection Bias in Sociological Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3052933openalex-snapshot
The Practice of Law as Confidence Game Organizational Cooptation of a Profession
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3053278openalex-snapshot
Bargain Justice in an Unjust World: Good Deals in the Criminal Courts?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w13187openalex-snapshot
An Analysis of the Performance of Federal Indigent Defense Counsel
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226778242.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Plea Bargaining
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7249/wr870openalex-snapshot
How Much Difference Does the Lawyer Make? The Effect of Defense Counsel on Murder Case Outcomes
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2658256openalex-extracted
Matching with Moral Hazard: Assigning Attorneys to Indigent Defendants
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2816622openalex-extracted
Make or Buy? The Provision of Indigent Defense Services in the U.S
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4854872openalex-extracted
The Impact of Working Conditions on Productivity: Evidence from the U.S. Public Defense System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118868799.ch14openalex-snapshot
Measurement Issues in Criminal Case‐Processing and Court Decision‐Making Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_814-1openalex-snapshot
Racial Bias and Ingroup Bias in Judicial Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76422-6_814openalex-snapshot
Racial Bias and Ingroup Bias in Judicial Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-024-09768-2openalex-snapshot
Indigent Injustice: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of People’s Criminal Legal Outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-025-09698-1openalex-snapshot
How defense attorney race, sex, and quality shape the guilty plea process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-024-09428-yopenalex-snapshot
Equality in Representation? The Efficacy of Court-Appointed Lawyers in the Chinese Criminal Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9430-6openalex-snapshot
A Comparison of Defendants with Mental Illness Represented by Public Defenders and Private Attorneys: an Analysis of Court-Ordered Pretrial Psychiatric Evaluations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101927openalex-snapshot
Evaluating the cumulative impact of indigent defense attorneys on criminal justice outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102458openalex-snapshot
Financial pretrial release and innovations in outcome measurement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102593openalex-snapshot
Assessing judicial responses of judges to stalking in South Korea: A focal concerns perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105630openalex-snapshot
The impact of working conditions on productivity: Evidence from the U.S. public defense system
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.09.003openalex-snapshot
Should we throw the book at ‘em? Charge combinations and conviction rates among alcohol-influenced drivers involved in motorcycle crashes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2024.12.008openalex-snapshot
Charge combinations and conviction rates among alcohol-influenced drivers involved in motor vehicle crashes in Iowa
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000186openalex-snapshot
Juvenile penalty or leniency: Sentencing of juveniles in the criminal justice system.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2022.2062582openalex-snapshot
Client Perspectives of Holistic Defense: Strengthening Procedural Justice through Enhanced Client Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2015.1109539openalex-snapshot
Predicting the length of jury deliberations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2023.2263862openalex-snapshot
Whose fault? Defendant perceptions of their own blameworthiness and guilty plea decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2023.2273379openalex-snapshot
Does type of counsel matter? A Comparison of outcomes in cases involving retained- and assigned counsel
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1786147openalex-snapshot
Satisfaction, Legitimacy, and Guilty Pleas: How Perceptions and Attorneys Affect Defendant Decision-Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2025.2460587openalex-snapshot
Defense Use of Digital Discovery in Criminal Cases: A Quantitative Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2020.1753141openalex-snapshot
Is Chivalry Dead?: An Examination of Charge Reductions in One Ohio Jurisdiction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2016.1248281openalex-snapshot
Does raising indigent defender pay rates improve defendant outcomes? Evidence from New York
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2015.1077760openalex-snapshot
The impact of extralegal characteristics on recognizance release among misdemeanants
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/712924openalex-snapshot
The Effect of Public Defender and Support Staff Caseloads on Incarceration Outcomes for Felony Defendants
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/713922openalex-snapshot
The Legacy of Slavery and Mass Incarceration: Evidence from Felony Case Outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahu003openalex-snapshot
Indigent Defense Counsel, Attorney Quality, and Defendant Outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197750506.013.36openalex-snapshot
Punishment and Discrimination
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12166openalex-snapshot
TRACING CHARGE TRAJECTORIES: A STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF RACE IN CHARGE CHANGES AT CASE SCREENING, ARRAIGNMENT, AND DISPOSITION*
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12560openalex-snapshot
The right to counsel: criminal prosecution in 19th century London
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12484openalex-snapshot
Public provisions of professional services
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70184openalex-snapshot
A Relational Theory of Inequality in the Criminal Legal System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-035326openalex-snapshot
Expanded Criminal Defense Lawyering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00891openalex-snapshot
Is Your Lawyer a Lemon? Incentives and Selection in the Public Provision of Criminal Defense
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00031224261423211openalex-snapshot
Collateral Decision-Making: The Case of Pretrial Detention and the Criminal Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717695224openalex-snapshot
Is a Plea Really a Bargain? An Analysis of Plea and Trial Dispositions in New York City
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718806901openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Type of Defense Counsel on Prosecutorial and Judicial Decision Making in Domestic Violence Cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211007745openalex-snapshot
Time for Time: Uncovering Case Processing Duration as a Source of Punitiveness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00111287261485820openalex-snapshot
Bargaining in the Shadow of Attorney Advice: The Effect of Defense Attorney Framing, Social Influence, and Source Credibility in Plea Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00224278221135544openalex-snapshot
Evaluating Racial and Ethnic Invariance Among the Correlates of Guilty Pleas: A Focus on the Effect of Court Legitimacy, Attorney Type, Satisfaction, and Plea-Offer Evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231208201openalex-snapshot
The Impact of the Defense Attorney on Plea Decision-Making: An Experimental Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00938548261473801openalex-snapshot
Organizational Landscapes of Legal Defense: Type of Counsel and Criminal Case Outcomes Across Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221102446openalex-snapshot
Prosecutorial Decision Making in Domestic Violence Cases: Are Prosecutors Holding Offenders Accountable?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0887403420903376openalex-snapshot
The Right to a Good Defense: Investigating the Influence of Attorney Type Across Urban Counties for Juveniles in Criminal Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/08874034221080188openalex-snapshot
The Gendered Effects of a Graduated Sanctions Model on Probation Outcomes in Kansas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221116999openalex-snapshot
Public defenders versus private attorneys: A comparison of criminal case disposition outcomes by type of counsel in Mexico
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/21533687211006456openalex-snapshot
Making Gideon Count? Public Defender Resources and Felony Case Outcomes for Black, White, and Latinx Individuals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/2755323x251350476openalex-snapshot
In-Group Favoritism in Sentencing Among the Courtroom Workgroup? Evidence From Hong Kong
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20150283openalex-snapshot
Matching with Moral Hazard: Assigning Attorneys to Poor Defendants
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15640/jlcj.v12p4openalex-snapshot
An Assessment of Compensation for Private Assigned Counsel in North Carolina
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7914openalex-snapshot
Examining Probation Lengths in Philadelphia, PA
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17760/d20004838openalex-snapshot
Improving effective advocacy by defense counsel of defendants with mental illness in district court criminal cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2025.4.924-946openalex-snapshot
Demystifying the Plea Process: Investigating Attorney Communications and Client Misconceptions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5092578openalex-snapshot
Defense Use of Digital Discovery in Criminal Cases: A Quantitative Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5229159openalex-snapshot
How Large-Scale Legal Aid Impacts Civil Proceedings: Evidence from Immigration Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.2168ad3eopenalex-snapshot
“Sometimes I’m Just Wearing the Prosecutor Down”: An Exploratory Analysis of Criminal Defense Attorneys in Plea Negotiations and Client Counseling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22201/iis.01882503p.2025.4.63064openalex-snapshot
Entre autoridad y comunidad. La imposición de la prisión preventiva
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.29263/lar04.2020.01openalex-snapshot
Acción y representación: indicadores de desempeño de la defensa en una muestra de audiencias de control de garantías en Colombia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/j3kc5openalex-snapshot
Attorney-client relationships in a criminal court in Santa Clara County, California
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-5061openalex-snapshot
The debt prison: The effect of court-ordered monetary sanctions on recidivism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3386/w24579openalex-snapshot
Is Your Lawyer a Lemon? Incentives and Selection in the Public Provision of Criminal Defense
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3386/w33629openalex-snapshot
Class Disparities and Discrimination in Traffic Stops and Searches
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33915/etd.12004openalex-snapshot
Essays on the Economics of Law and Crime
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5070/cj86157744openalex-snapshot
The Unwarranted Disparity Statement: A New Tool to Reduce Disparities In Postarrest Outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7249/rra108-19openalex-snapshot
Indigent Defense Environmental Scan: Identifying Research Needs to Support Fair and Equitable Indigent Defense in the United States
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.