On the public citation graph

A Note On Positivism

https://doi.org/10.1177/089692057600600205

0 signed · 29 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15386-2openalex-snapshot

The Philosophy of The Social Sciences

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17102-6openalex-snapshot

An Introduction to the Logic of the Sciences

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1526-4_13openalex-snapshot

Surrender and Community Study: The Study of Loma

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6openalex-snapshot

Collected Papers I

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3050879openalex-snapshot

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/286983openalex-snapshot

Studies in the Logic of Explanation

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-196008000-00012openalex-snapshot

The Sociological Imagination

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0149.1960.tb00952.xopenalex-snapshot

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE LOGIC OF THE SCIENCES

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1969660openalex-snapshot

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/089692057300300205openalex-snapshot

The Need for Critical Theory

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/089692057300300210openalex-snapshot

Report On the Midwest Conference for a Relevant Soctal Science: Feb, 1972

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/089692057300400102openalex-snapshot

The Political Economy Of Professional Sociology

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/089692057400400207openalex-snapshot

Paradigms - Problematics- Perspectives - and Positivism?

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/089692057400400407openalex-snapshot

The Roots of Radical Sociology

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1891592openalex-snapshot

The Sociological Imagination

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2092245openalex-snapshot

Studies in Ethnomethodology.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2092246openalex-snapshot

Studies in Ethnomethodology.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2948605openalex-snapshot

Boys in White.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/4611040openalex-snapshot

The Professional Organization of Sociology: A View from Below

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/588015openalex-snapshot

Change and Controversy in Recent American Sociology

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/588861openalex-snapshot

The Dehumanization of Anomie and Alienation: A Problem in the Ideology of Sociology

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203715611-6openalex-snapshot

Philosophy of the social sciences

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206openalex-snapshot

The Discovery of Grounded Theory

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715070-3openalex-snapshot

Symbolic Interactionism

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226112879.001.0001openalex-snapshot

Mind, Self, and Society

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2953236openalex-extracted

Safe Harbor for Derivatives in Bankruptcy: Overstayed Its Welcome?

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0307472200017429openalex-snapshot

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/3339825openalex-snapshot

The Canadian Sociology Movement: Analysis and Assessment

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4467/2450050xsnr.22.018.17031openalex-snapshot

The Potential of the US Courts to Adjudicate Restitution Claims Involving Colonial Cultural Objects

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.