On the public citation graph

Jury Decision Making: Implications For and From Psychology

https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410397282
0 signed · 116 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74490-2openalex-snapshot
Civil Juries and Civil Justice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74490-2_1openalex-snapshot
Crisis, What Crisis? Perception and Reality in Civil Justice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0696-0_3openalex-snapshot
Emotional Influences on Judgments of Legal Blame: How They Happen, Whether They Should, and What to Do About It
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7569-0openalex-snapshot
Handbook of Trial Consulting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7569-0_13openalex-snapshot
Consulting on Damage Awards
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9039-7openalex-snapshot
The Impact on Juror Verdicts of Judicial Instruction to Disregard Inadmissible Evidence: A Meta-Analysis.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9056-6openalex-snapshot
The Use of Religion in Death Penalty Sentencing Trials.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9144-xopenalex-snapshot
Strength of evidence, extraevidentiary influence, and the liberation hypothesis: Data from the field.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.909openalex-snapshot
The consolidation of plaintiffs: The effects of number of plaintiffs on jurors' liability decisions, damage awards, and cognitive processing of evidence.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.21openalex-snapshot
Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.857openalex-snapshot
Prototypes in the courtroom: Lay representations of legal concepts.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189openalex-snapshot
Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/10464-000openalex-snapshot
Determining damages: The psychology of jury awards.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.6.3.743openalex-snapshot
Precious little guidance: Jury instruction on damage awards.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.7.2.91openalex-snapshot
Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00035.xopenalex-snapshot
Judge‐Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven and Zeisel's The American Jury
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00089.xopenalex-snapshot
Deliberation Quality: A Preliminary Examination in Criminal Juries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/4150614openalex-snapshot
Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information? The Difficulty of Deliberately Disregarding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.17.2.174openalex-snapshot
The promise of a cognitive perspective on jury deliberation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315590790-8openalex-snapshot
Psychological Issues in Civil Trials

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3497014openalex-extracted
Bias, Trust, and Trustworthiness: An Experimental Study of Post Justice System Outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3809478openalex-extracted
Is one judging head the same as three: a natural experiment on individuals vs teams
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781118373880.ch8openalex-snapshot
Forensic Psychiatry and Forensic Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781394289868.ch17openalex-snapshot
COGNITION AND THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3146openalex-snapshot
Does the Narrative Style of Video Evidence Influence Judgements About Rape Complainant Testimony?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3251openalex-snapshot
Does a Judicial Warning Improve Defendant‐Culprit Matching?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70227openalex-snapshot
The Timing of Expert Testimony on Juror Assessments of Eyewitness Reliability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.70064openalex-snapshot
Who Is Afraid of the Pink Elephant? Evidence on (Not) Ignoring Inadmissible Evidence and Debiasing Interventions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2431openalex-snapshot
Simulated judicial decision‐making for African and European American adolescents with illegal sexual behavior: The impact of medical data and victim race/ethnicity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2077-8_7openalex-snapshot
Race and Its Place in the United States Legal System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16038-8_5openalex-snapshot
The Jury and Potential for Corruption
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03312-3_19openalex-snapshot
Jury Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-024-01551-2openalex-snapshot
Plea Bargaining when Juror Effort is Costly
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11757-020-00636-7openalex-snapshot
Tatsächliche und wahrgenommene Richtigkeit von Personenidentifizierungen älterer Augenzeugen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-026-09949-5openalex-snapshot
Racial Differences in Interpretations of Standards of Proof and Jury Impartiality in the U.S. Criminal Justice System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04095-7openalex-snapshot
The role of perceived defendant criminality on attributions and case outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-025-00357-2openalex-snapshot
Miscarriages of justice in judges’ mind: theory and experimental evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-382165-2.00034-9openalex-snapshot
Forensic Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2020.100488openalex-snapshot
Drivers of juror's malpractice assessments in auditor litigation involving offshoring and overtime: Generation and a management Mindset
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2023.08.003openalex-snapshot
Accomplice plea bargains in the presence of costly juror effort
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2026.102197openalex-snapshot
Juror decision making: Does juror stigma, mental health literacy, or the description of a defendant's mental health status, impact decision-making in a mock criminal trial?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2026.106360openalex-snapshot
Policing or penalties? Deterrence in a model of plea bargaining with costly juror effort
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.03.004openalex-snapshot
Introduction and validation of the Juror Decision Scale (JDS): An empirical investigation of the Story Model
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2016.77openalex-snapshot
Crime and Punishment: the Impact of Skin Color and Socioeconomic Status of Defendants and Victims in Jury Trials in Brazil
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000016openalex-snapshot
Educating Canadian jurors about the not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder defence.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/law0000038openalex-snapshot
Instructions on reasonable doubt: Defining the standard of proof and the juror’s task.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/law0000188openalex-snapshot
A social judgment? Extralegal contrast effects in hypothetical legal decision making.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000539.suppopenalex-snapshot
Supplemental Material for Improving Juror Assessments of Forensic Testimony and Its Effects on Decision-Making and Evidence Evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0762-8openalex-snapshot
Drivers are blamed more than their automated cars when both make mistakes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-025-00430-4openalex-snapshot
Psychological insights for judging expertise and implications for adversarial legal contexts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-32051-3_2openalex-snapshot
The Nature and Effects of Adversarialism: Jury Decision-Making in Sexual Assault Trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2021.2018877openalex-snapshot
The Effects of Victim Gender Identity, Juror Gender, and Judicial Instructions on Victim Blaming, Crime Severity Ratings, and Verdicts in Sexual Assault Trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2023.2206116openalex-snapshot
The role of meeting management in group decision-making: lessons learnt from UK fostering and adoption panels
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0907676x.2024.2343772openalex-snapshot
Juror perceptions in bilingual interpreted trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2290166openalex-snapshot
Testing thrasymachus’ hypothesis: the psychological processes behind power justification
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2022.2163752openalex-snapshot
Comprehension problems that jurors encounter with expert evidence in online child pornography trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2017.1296914openalex-snapshot
Judicial Decision-Making and Juvenile Offenders: Effects of Medical Evidence and Victim Age
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2011.641557openalex-snapshot
Beliefs and expectancies in legal decision making: an introduction to the Special Issue
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2016.1239101openalex-snapshot
Mock jurors’ expectations regarding the psychological harm experienced by rape victims as a function of rape prototypicality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2017.1351965openalex-snapshot
Jury instructions and mock-juror sensitivity to confession evidence in a simulated criminal case
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2017.1351967openalex-snapshot
Attitudes, anger, and nullification instructions influence jurors’ verdicts in euthanasia cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2021.1984482openalex-snapshot
The disappearing trial: how social scientists can help save the jury from extinction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2025.2581083openalex-snapshot
Juror perceptions of rape involving Rohypnol
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2026.2696035openalex-snapshot
Will remote forensic evaluations make you look bad in court? The influence of attorney questioning on expert credibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2026.2673511openalex-snapshot
Unmet Needs? Juror Perspectives on Support Following Jury Service in England and Wales
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2013.856278openalex-snapshot
Prediction of Jury Verdicts in Child Sexual Assault Trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1478334openalex-snapshot
A re-examination of the acquittal biasing effect of offence seriousness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1721377openalex-snapshot
Mock jurors’ awareness of age-related changes in memory and cognitive capacity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1821827openalex-snapshot
Juror perceptions of the stereotypical violent crime defendant
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1837027openalex-snapshot
How downplaying or exaggerating crime severity in a confession affects perceived guilt
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1862002openalex-snapshot
Trust in the jury system: a comparison of Australian and U.S. samples
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2026.2632608openalex-snapshot
Mock juror decision-making and the intersectionality of race and gender in a case of intimate partner violence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780197564028.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Jury Decision-Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190658113.003.0006openalex-snapshot
In the Aftermath of Ferguson
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197541296.013.14openalex-snapshot
Information Processing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.38openalex-snapshot
First Steps on the Path to Wrongful Conviction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.41openalex-snapshot
Jury Decision-Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.44openalex-snapshot
Law, Psychology, and Wrongful Convictions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/jacpr-01-2016-0210openalex-snapshot
Juror perceptions of female-female sexual harassment: do sexual orientation and type of harassment matter?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/vr51125.2022.00082openalex-snapshot
Supporting Jury Understanding of Expert Evidence in a Virtual Environment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12779openalex-snapshot
The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors’ perceptions and judgements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14323openalex-snapshot
Error Rates, Likelihood Ratios, and Jury Evaluation of Forensic Evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70014openalex-snapshot
Eyewitness testimony by individuals who stammer: Evidence, experience and perceived credibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12003openalex-snapshot
Assisting jurors: Promoting recall of trial information through the use of a trial‐ordered notebook
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12043openalex-snapshot
Predicting verdicts using pre‐trial attitudes and standard of proof
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12370openalex-snapshot
Validating workplace‐based assessments: continuity, synthesis and a qualitative heart
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12690openalex-snapshot
By Design: How People Adapt to Cognitive Limitations in Politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116661545openalex-snapshot
Intentional or Negligent Homicide? Evidence for Juror Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221087177openalex-snapshot
Does Convenience Come with a Price? The Impact of Remote Testimony on Perceptions of Expert Credibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518768566openalex-snapshot
Juror Decision Making in Acquaintance and Marital Rape: The Influence of Clothing, Alcohol, and Preexisting Stereotypical Attitudes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518790601openalex-snapshot
Intoxicated But Not Incapacitated: Are There Effective Methods to Assist Juries in Interpreting Evidence of Voluntary Complainant Intoxication in Cases of Rape?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261467507openalex-snapshot
Making Sense of Consent: A Qualitative Analysis of Australian Mock Juror Decision-Making in a Rape Trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10464964241274124openalex-snapshot
A Conceptualization of Mood Influences on Group Judgment and Decision Making: The Key Function of Dominant Cognitive Processing Strategies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1365712719873008openalex-snapshot
Beliefs about suspect alibis: A survey of lay people in the United Kingdom, Israel, and Sweden
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/14999013261480723openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Stigma and Diagnostic Term on Juror Decision-Making in a Mock Criminal Trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/19485506231177328openalex-snapshot
Judging Guilt: Implicit Evaluations of Defendants Predict Verdicts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918823722openalex-snapshot
Opening the Black Box: A Multilevel Framework for Studying Group Processes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12794/metadc271808openalex-snapshot
Connecting the Circuit: Analyzing Jurors' Cognitive Gaps and Damage Awards in Patent Infringement Trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212491openalex-snapshot
The impact of individual differences on jurors’ note taking during trials and recall of trial evidence, and the association between the type of evidence recalled and verdicts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2024-0053openalex-snapshot
Bias, Trust, and Trustworthiness: An Experimental Study of Post Justice System Outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22201/fesi.20070780e.2020.12.2.76306openalex-snapshot
Investigación traslacional en psicología jurídica: propuestas, retos y perspectivas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22215/etd/2023-15842openalex-snapshot
Indigenous Victims with Mental Illness: The Influence of Stereotypes and Stigma on Mock-Juror Perceptions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22459/ndla.09.2017.14openalex-snapshot
Stereotypes in the Courtroom
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2021-13-2-207-239openalex-snapshot
Strategies of Preventing Juries from Acquitting at the District Court Level: Jury Reform in Russia and Luhmann’s System Theory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3138/ijsll-2025-0022openalex-snapshot
The Effects of Expert Conclusions and Additional Forensic Evidence on Listener Evaluations in a Voice Comparison Task
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32920/ryerson.14648445openalex-snapshot
Modeling juror decisions: a comparison of perceptions of innocence and guilt
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32920/ryerson.14648445.v1openalex-snapshot
Modeling juror decisions: a comparison of perceptions of innocence and guilt
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00047openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Prior Trial Experience on Mock Jurors’ Note Taking During Trials and Recall of Trial Evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785677openalex-snapshot
Likeability and Expert Persuasion: Dislikeability Reduces the Perceived Persuasiveness of Expert Evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1268openalex-snapshot
Coping with the undesired consequences of jury reform
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805681.00023openalex-snapshot
Law and economics in the laboratory
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfu.2022.1.140.27openalex-snapshot
Exploring public attitudes towards sex and grievous bodily harm offenders who have experienced childhood abuse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6339/24-jds1130openalex-snapshot
Demonstrative Evidence and the Use of Algorithms in Jury Trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.64628/aai.k6ghkk4kuopenalex-snapshot
Opening statements are the most important part of a trial – as lawyers in Trump’s hush money case know well
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/3e4eb503zc3ffz4231zafb6ze51134f09c36openalex-snapshot
Crimes et châtiments. La pratique de qesâs en Iran sous la République islamique : État, société et punition
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.88121openalex-snapshot
Documenting Cervical Spine Injuries Following Negative MRI Findings: Clinical and Medico-Legal Overview of Dynamic Imaging
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.