On the public citation graph

Abortion Rights as Human Rights

https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663916668391
0 signed · 60 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.09.006openalex-snapshot
Misoprostol use in developing countries: results from a multicountry study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-8080(00)90001-6openalex-snapshot
Human rights, reproductive health and economic justice: Why they are indivisible
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-8080(04)24010-1openalex-snapshot
Misoprostol Alone for Early Medical Abortion in a Latin American Clinic Setting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511627088.003openalex-snapshot
The Mystery of Global Governance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511980442.006openalex-snapshot
Abortion, Dignity, and a Capabilities Approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147964.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Reconceiving Autonomy: Sources, Thoughts and Possibilities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn008openalex-snapshot
Abortion as a Human Right--International and Regional Standards
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos013openalex-snapshot
Dignity and sexuality: Claims on dignity in transnational debates over abortion and same-sex marriage
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/s0163-786x(2011)0000032013openalex-snapshot
“The Phrase of the Day”: Examining Contexts and Co-Optation of Reproductive Justice Activism in the Women's Movement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00836.xopenalex-snapshot
Human Rights and Root Causes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/157181002761931387openalex-snapshot
Feminism, Imperialism and the Mission of International Law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9963-0005openalex-snapshot
access-to-information-on-safe-abortion-a-harm-reduction-and-human-rights-approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-103-2-3-451openalex-snapshot
“The Most We Can Hope For...”: Human Rights and the Politics of Fatalism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383871-001openalex-snapshot
Introduction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1997.0003openalex-snapshot
Enemies or Allies? Feminism and Cultural Relativism as Dissident Voices in Human Rights Discourse
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2003.0020openalex-snapshot
Rights Talk and the Experience of Law: Implementing Women's Human Rights to Protection from Violence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/pol.2003.26.1.55openalex-snapshot
Human Rights Law and the Demonization of Culture (And Anthropology Along the Way)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.18356/a0e71e84-enopenalex-snapshot
International Conference on Population and Development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2004.055111openalex-snapshot
The Right to Health Under International Law and Its Relevance to the United States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1865841openalex-snapshot
Reproductive Health as a Human Right
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.264214openalex-snapshot
The Constitutional Convention of 1937: The Original Meaning of the New Jurisprudential Deal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2203269openalex-snapshot
Feminist Approaches to International Law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/590489openalex-snapshot
Abortion and Woman's Choice: The State, Sexuality and Reproductive Freedom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjk2vkfopenalex-snapshot
The Last Utopia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31641/clr150210openalex-snapshot
Reproductive Rights at Home and Abroad
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315199955-18openalex-snapshot
The International Human Rights Movement: Part of the Problem?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-3414openalex-snapshot
The last utopia: human rights in history
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1311openalex-snapshot
Human Rights and Transnational Culture: Regulating Gender Violence through Global Law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812206104.152openalex-snapshot
Chapter 11. The Cairo “Compromise” on Abortion and Its Consequences for Making Abortion Safe and Legal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812206104.21openalex-snapshot
Chapter 2. The Global Reproductive Health and Rights Agenda: Opportunities and Challenges for the Future
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812206104.3openalex-snapshot
Chapter 1. Global Reproductive Health and Rights: Reflecting on ICPD
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812209990.279openalex-snapshot
13. Toward Transformative Equality in Nepal: The Lakshmi Dhikta Decision
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812209990.36openalex-snapshot
2. Abortion in Portugal: New Trends in European Constitutionalism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812209990.56openalex-snapshot
3. Women’s Rights in the Abortion Decision of the Slovak Constitutional Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812209990.98openalex-snapshot
5. A Functionalist Approach to Comparative Abortion Law119

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3206704openalex-extracted
El aborto legal y el problema del orden jurídico posmoral (Legal Abortion and the Problem of the Post-Moral Legal Order)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3229211openalex-extracted
El Triunfo de Tánatos: La Afirmación y la Negación en el Deseo de Tener Derecho al Aborto (The Triumph of Thanatos: Affirmation and Denial in the Desire to Have Abortion Rights)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-025-09597-wopenalex-snapshot
Re-Articulating Abortion Rights and/as Reproductive Health Justice Post-Dobbs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00167-9openalex-snapshot
Abortion Law and Human Rights in Poland: The Closing of the Jurisprudential Horizon
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055424000960openalex-snapshot
A Ticking Time Bomb: Restrictions on Abortion Rights and Physical Integrity Rights Abuses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2023.2298937openalex-snapshot
Endings and beginnings: Dobbs and the urgency of rhetorical invention
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2022.2125501openalex-snapshot
Reproductive rights at home? Prohibiting telehealth abortion in South Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2500828openalex-snapshot
Telehealth abortion services via Women on Web in Kenya (2013–2019): a descriptive analysis of the characteristics and motivations of the care seekers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11117/rdp.v21i112.8233openalex-snapshot
Lei do aborto e direitos humanos na Polônia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004141openalex-snapshot
Integrating rights and evidence: a technical advance in abortion guideline development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005120openalex-snapshot
Identifying data for the empirical assessment of law (IDEAL): a realist approach to research gaps on the health effects of abortion law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173931openalex-snapshot
From Her Story, to Our Story
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642042openalex-snapshot
"I Deleted It After the Overturn of Roe v. Wade": Understanding Women's Privacy Concerns Toward Period-Tracking Apps in the Post Roe v. Wade Era
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10092openalex-snapshot
Telemedical and Self-Managed Abortion: A Human Rights Imperative?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00031224251335964openalex-snapshot
Abortion Policies in a Polarizing World Society, 1970 to 2020
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/09646639241256011openalex-snapshot
Abortion Anarchy? The Case for Abortion Decriminalization
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1468017319852602openalex-snapshot
Reflections of stress in US abortion narratives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00934-9openalex-snapshot
The missing voices in the conscientious objection debate: British service users’ experiences of conscientious objection to abortion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202147openalex-snapshot
Socio-Legal Strategies against a Total Abortion Ban in El Salvador: Alliances in Hostile Contexts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5368844openalex-snapshot
Reproductive Rights in Ecuador: Navigating the Intersection of Culture, Law, and Women's Autonomy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.23889/suthesis.63877openalex-snapshot
Informed Consent and Trisomy Screening: Delineating Parent and Professional Interests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2024-gn5ssopenalex-snapshot
A Ticking Time Bomb: Restrictions on Abortion Rights and Physical Integrity Rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7837-3.ch001openalex-snapshot
Whose Rights Prevail?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/25/20231870openalex-snapshot
Radical Feminism and Family Law: Addressing Gender Bias, Reforming, and Beyond
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24002711openalex-snapshot
Additional file 1 of The missing voices in the conscientious objection debate: British service users’ experiences of conscientious objection to abortion
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.