On the public citation graph
Patient factors associated with non-attendance at colonoscopy after a positive screening faecal occult blood test
0 signed · 80 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.372openalex-snapshot
Lack of Follow-up After Fecal Occult Blood Testing in Older Adults
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6136openalex-snapshot
Survival benefit in a randomized clinical trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23273openalex-snapshot
Colorectal cancer screening: A comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1865openalex-snapshot
Individual‐level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual‐level health behavior constructs and screening behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-010-9348-0openalex-snapshot
Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Primary Care Patients: Does Risk Affect Screening Behavior?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2013.07.008openalex-snapshot
Colorectal cancer screening by guaiac faecal occult blood test in France: Evaluation of the programme two years after launching
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.07.051openalex-snapshot
Factors Associated With Missed and Cancelled Colonoscopy Appointments at Veterans Health Administration Facilities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2012.11.008openalex-snapshot
Computed tomographic colonography in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test refusing optical colonoscopy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.010openalex-snapshot
Patients’ experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context—A systematic review of the literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.028openalex-snapshot
Lack of follow-up colonoscopy after positive FOBT in an organized colorectal cancer screening program is associated with modifiable health care practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9270(00)02268-1openalex-snapshot
Factors that influence the decision to do an adequate evaluation of a patient with a positive stool for occult blood
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03386-7openalex-snapshot
Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03430-7openalex-snapshot
Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70588-6openalex-snapshot
Preferences for cancer investigation: a vignette-based study of primary-care attendees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.140openalex-snapshot
Reasons for Participation and Nonparticipation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Trial of Colonoscopy and CT Colonography
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.255openalex-snapshot
Primary care endorsement letter and a patient leaflet to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening: results of a factorial randomised trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.476openalex-snapshot
Colorectal cancer screening: factors associated with colonoscopy after a positive faecal occult blood test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.469openalex-snapshot
Factors associated with completion of bowel cancer screening and the potential effects of simplifying the screening test algorithm
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.47openalex-snapshot
Understanding missed opportunities for more timely diagnosis of cancer in symptomatic patients after presentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604089openalex-snapshot
The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200011303432203openalex-snapshot
The Effect of Fecal Occult-Blood Screening on the Incidence of Colorectal Cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00164.xopenalex-snapshot
Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300843openalex-snapshot
Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-309086openalex-snapshot
Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-05-0916openalex-snapshot
Barriers to Full Colon Evaluation for a Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-272openalex-snapshot
Factors associated with intentions to adhere to colorectal cancer screening follow-up exams
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaopenalex-snapshot
Using thematic analysis in psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.906openalex-snapshot
Reasons Patients With a Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Result Do Not Undergo Complete Diagnostic Evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.09.3500openalex-snapshot
Analysis of Barriers to and Patients' Preferences for CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Nonadherent Urban Population
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140125openalex-snapshot
Results of Nurse Navigator Follow-up After Positive Colorectal Cancer Screening Test: A Randomized Trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20111openalex-snapshot
Patient navigation: An update on the state of the science
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30765openalex-snapshot
Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow‐up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31145openalex-snapshot
Factors affecting compliance with confirmatory colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test in a national colorectal screening program
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5661-2openalex-snapshot
Magnetic resonance enterography, small bowel ultrasound and colonoscopy to diagnose and stage Crohn’s disease: patient acceptability and perceived burden
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-06866-xopenalex-snapshot
Patient Navigation After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Results Increases Diagnostic Colonoscopy and Highlights Multilevel Barriers to Follow-Up
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-026-01501-2openalex-snapshot
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Malaysia: Understanding the iFOBT-to-Colonoscopy Gap
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2019.101588openalex-snapshot
Patient non-attendance at urgent referral appointments for suspected cancer and its links to cancer diagnosis and one year mortality: A cohort study of patients referred on the Two Week Wait pathway
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2022.102064openalex-snapshot
Improving colorectal cancer screening - consumer-centred technological interventions to enhance engagement and participation amongst diverse cohorts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2018.05.013openalex-snapshot
Straight-to-test faecal tagging CT colonography for exclusion of colon cancer in symptomatic patients under the English 2-week-wait cancer investigation pathway: a service review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.007openalex-snapshot
Testing whether barriers to a hypothetical screening test affect unrelated perceived benefits and vice versa: A randomised, experimental study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105857openalex-snapshot
The Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network: Accelerating the implementation of evidence-based cancer prevention and control interventions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30176-1openalex-snapshot
Multiple rounds of one sample versus two sample faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a population-based study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0381-4openalex-snapshot
Reasons For Lack of Follow-up Colonoscopy Among Persons With A Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Result: A Qualitative Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1044/2021_lshss-20-00083openalex-snapshot
Organizational Aspects and Outcomes of a Hearing Screening Program Among First-Grade Children in the Mazovian Region of Poland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1487520openalex-snapshot
Why do some participants in colorectal cancer screening choose not to undergo colonoscopy following a positive test result? A qualitative study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1844391openalex-snapshot
Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2021.1980675openalex-snapshot
Why do participants in the Flemish colorectal cancer screening program not undergo a diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy271openalex-snapshot
Association of ten gastrointestinal and other medical conditions with positivity to faecal occult blood testing in routine screening: a large prospective study of women in England
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdw147openalex-snapshot
Incomplete diagnostic follow-up after a positive colorectal cancer screening test: a systematic review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/cej.0000000000000344openalex-snapshot
Interventions to increase uptake of faecal tests for colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/cej.0000000000000533openalex-snapshot
Do socioeconomic factors play a role in nonadherence to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test in the Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/ppo.0000000000000317openalex-snapshot
Data-Powered Participatory Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12704openalex-snapshot
Effects of a modified invitation letter to follow‐up colonoscopy for bowel cancer detection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16445openalex-snapshot
Faecal immunochemical testing reduces demand and improves yield of Leicester's 2‐week pathway for change in bowel habit
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16374openalex-snapshot
Risk factors for colorectal cancer in a fecal immunochemical test‐positive group: The National Health Insurance Service‐National Health Screening Cohort
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12793openalex-snapshot
Provision of colonoscopy in rural settings: A qualitative assessment of provider context, barriers, facilitators, and capacity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/phn.70115openalex-snapshot
Multi‐Sensory Intervention to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Attitudes in Adults ≥ 50: A Randomized Controlled Trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035264openalex-snapshot
Preferences for different diagnostic modalities to follow up abnormal colorectal cancer screening results: a hypothetical vignette study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.crc-25-0766openalex-snapshot
Assessing the Feasibility of Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening in Pune, India
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1073274819825828openalex-snapshot
CRC Screening Results: Patient Comprehension and Follow-up
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08623-9openalex-snapshot
Colorectal Cancer screening in ambulatory healthcare service clinics in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates in 2015–2016
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10487-6openalex-snapshot
Implementation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in Malaysia (CRC-SIM)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6071-8openalex-snapshot
Barriers to bowel scope (flexible sigmoidoscopy) screening: a comparison of non-responders, active decliners and non-attenders
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06056-8openalex-snapshot
Improvement of participation rate in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by training general practitioners in motivational interviewing (AmDepCCR)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170731openalex-snapshot
Perceived patient burden and acceptability of whole body MRI for staging lung and colorectal cancer; comparison with standard staging investigations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01319openalex-snapshot
Optimizing Initial Screening for Colorectal Cancer Detection with Adherence Behavior
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2871openalex-snapshot
Reasons for No Colonoscopy After an Unfavorable Screening Result in Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Nationwide Questionnaire
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000010openalex-snapshot
Strategies to Improve Follow-up After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Community-Based Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2196/11114openalex-snapshot
Repeated Automated Mobile Text Messaging Reminders for Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Randomized Controlled Trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.11114openalex-snapshot
Repeated Automated Mobile Text Messaging Reminders for Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.48813openalex-snapshot
Expression Status of ABCC1, an ABC Transporter, Helps to Monitor Response to Chemotherapy in COAD Patients (Preprint)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3310/hta23420openalex-snapshot
Magnetic resonance enterography compared with ultrasonography in newly diagnosed and relapsing Crohn’s disease patients: the METRIC diagnostic accuracy study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01284openalex-snapshot
Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: The Role of Translational Proteomics Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/app12073341openalex-snapshot
AI and Clinical Decision Making: The Limitations and Risks of Computational Reductionism in Bowel Cancer Screening
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp1919x706625openalex-snapshot
Non-attendance at urgent referral appointments for suspected cancer: a qualitative study to gain understanding from patients and GPs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19x706625openalex-snapshot
Non-attendance at urgent referral appointments for suspected cancer: a qualitative study to gain understanding from patients and GPs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.36290/vnl.2022.116openalex-snapshot
How to convince a patient refusing colonoscopy - a qualitative study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5102/pic.n1.2018.6406openalex-snapshot
Proteômica de biopsias líquidas (sérica e urina) como biomarcadores nos adenocarcinomas colorretais
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.