On the public citation graph
The Effects of Race and Gender on the Judicial Ambitions of State Trial Court Judges
0 signed · 73 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01545033openalex-snapshot
Conflicting testimony: Judges' and attorneys' perceptions of gender bias in legal settings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055406062101openalex-snapshot
When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096500024501openalex-snapshot
On the Knife's Edge: Public Officials and the Life Cycle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096501000385openalex-snapshot
Women and Political Participation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x05050154openalex-snapshot
Religion, Race, and Gender Differences in Political Ambition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2006.10767783openalex-snapshot
Court Diversification: Staffing the State Courts of Last Resort Through Interim Appointments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/225410openalex-snapshot
Positive Effects of the Multiple Negative: Explaining the Success of Black Professional Women
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/269125openalex-snapshot
Mail Survey Response Rate: A Meta-Analysis of Selected Techniques for Inducing Response
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00069.xopenalex-snapshot
Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00402.xopenalex-snapshot
See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900206openalex-snapshot
The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907304497openalex-snapshot
Ambition, Gender, and the Judiciary
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591297602900105openalex-snapshot
The Urban Party Organization as an Opportunity Structure: Race and Party Differences Among Cleveland Ward Leaders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591297703000402openalex-snapshot
Race, Recruitment, and Representation: Background Differences Between Black and White Trial Court Judges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298003300107openalex-snapshot
Ambition Theory and the Black Politician
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000300300104openalex-snapshot
The State of Surveying Legislators: Dilemmas and Suggestions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000300300401openalex-snapshot
Explaining Judicial Diversity: The Differential Ability of Women and Minorities to Attain Seats on State Supreme and Appellate Courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1300/j014v23n03_04openalex-snapshot
Women in the American Judiciary
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1300/j014v24n02_02openalex-snapshot
Gender and Racial Diversification of State Supreme Courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1271407openalex-snapshot
Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1519882openalex-snapshot
Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1957422openalex-snapshot
Women, Elections, and Representation. By R. Darcy, Susan Welch, and Janet Clark (New York: Longman, 1987. viii, 181p. $12.95).
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1959283openalex-snapshot
A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2071739openalex-snapshot
Women as Candidates in American Politics.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2110340openalex-snapshot
Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2110769openalex-snapshot
Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2111039openalex-snapshot
Private Costs of Public Commitments or Public Costs of Private Commitments? Family Roles versus Political Ambition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2111397openalex-snapshot
Political Women and Political Ambition: Closing the Gender Gap
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2132074openalex-snapshot
A Bench That Looks Like America? Representation of African Americans and Latinos on the Federal Courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2147153openalex-snapshot
The Concept of Representation, by Hanna F. Pitkin
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2647821openalex-snapshot
Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes"
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2647822openalex-snapshot
Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2965458openalex-snapshot
Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/418859openalex-snapshot
On the Knife's Edge: Public Officials and the Life Cycle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/439945openalex-snapshot
Career Opportunities and Membership Stability in Legislatures
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/447241openalex-snapshot
A Portrait of Marginality, the Political Behavior of the American Woman
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/447584openalex-snapshot
The Urban Party Organization as an Opportunity Structure: Race and Party Differences among Cleveland Ward Leaders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.91.2.563openalex-snapshot
AMBITION AS A MOTIVATIONAL BASIS OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL COMMITMENT: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF A PROPOSED CAREER ADVANCEMENT AMBITION SCALE
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-2993openalex-snapshot
Political parties and the winning of office
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-0625openalex-snapshot
Women and elective office: past, present, and future
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2492365openalex-extracted
Women's Representation in the Highest Court: A Comparative Analysis of the Appointment of Female Justices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3324661openalex-extracted
Which Judicial Selection Systems Generate the Most Women Judges? Lessons from the United States
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53381-0_3openalex-snapshot
Insights from State High Court Judges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09966-2openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Descriptive Representation on Support for Judicial Nominees and the US Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-026-10131-0openalex-snapshot
Breaking Barriers: Analyzing Women Prosecutors’ Electoral Success
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9282-zopenalex-snapshot
“Who Better to Do It Than Me!:” Race, Gender & the Deciding to Run Accounts of Political Women in Texas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103744openalex-snapshot
A meta-analytic review of the gender difference in leadership aspirations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2022.19openalex-snapshot
The Electoral Connection in Court: How Sentencing Responds to Voter Preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2026.10074openalex-snapshot
Race, Protest, and Political Ambition: Exploring How Age Intersects with Race to Shape Office-Seeking Ambitions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x10000255openalex-snapshot
Difference in Judicial Discourse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x10000267openalex-snapshot
Women Candidates and Judicial Elections: Telling an Untold Story
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2013.10768042openalex-snapshot
Blind Justice or Blind Ambition? The Influence of Promotion on Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2019.1654948openalex-snapshot
Succession, Opportunism, and Rebellion on State Supreme Courts: Decisions to Run for Chief Justice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2013.776379openalex-snapshot
Bringing Narrative In: Race–Gender Storytelling, Political Ambition, and Women's Paths to Public Office
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2022.2068120openalex-snapshot
Her Honor: Black Women Judges’ Experiences with Disrespect and Recusal Requests in the American Judiciary
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1554477x.2026.2735785openalex-snapshot
Adolescents’ Ambition Unraveled: How Distinguishing Between Public Office Positions Provides More Insight into the Gender Gap in Political Ambition
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2015.1031801openalex-snapshot
Stepping up: black political ambition and success
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1208105openalex-snapshot
Gender, race, and political ambition: how intersectionality and frames influence interest in political office
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjp034openalex-snapshot
When is AG Short for Aspiring Governor? Ambition and Policy Making Dynamics in the Office of State Attorney General
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2009.01037.xopenalex-snapshot
Enhancing the Foster Care Review Process: The Case of Kentucky's Interested Party Review Program
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12109openalex-snapshot
“Your Honor” is a Female: A Multistage Electoral Analysis of Women's Successes at Securing State Trial Court Judgeships*
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916668411openalex-snapshot
Women’s Representation in the Highest Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129251328344openalex-snapshot
Sex, Campaign Contributions, and State Courts of Last Resort
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129261459084openalex-snapshot
Leaks in the Judicial Pipeline: Evidence of a Gender Gap in Perceived Qualifications and Ambition for the Federal Bench
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532440020907975openalex-snapshot
Judicial Reform in the American States: The Chief Justice as Political Advocate
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532440020945285openalex-snapshot
Selecting Chief Justices by Peer Vote
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x18788043openalex-snapshot
Why Women Win: Gender and Success in State Supreme Court Elections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15367/com.v15i2.468openalex-snapshot
Judicial Selection and the Underrepresentation of Women on the Pennsylvania Courts of Common Pleas
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.