On the public citation graph

Two-level politics and the backlash against international courts: Evidence from the politicisation of the European court of human rights

https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120948180
0 signed · 45 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780685175openalex-snapshot
Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511804366openalex-snapshot
Contentious Performances
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511973529openalex-snapshot
Power in Movement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300027697openalex-snapshot
Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300028113openalex-snapshot
Beyond two-level games: domestic–international interaction in the intermediate-range nuclear forces negotiations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744552318000034openalex-snapshot
Backlash Against International Courts: Explaining the Forms and Patterns of Resistance to International Courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744552318000058openalex-snapshot
Parting ways or lashing back? Withdrawals, backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694495.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu021openalex-snapshot
Universality or Diversity of Human Rights?: Strasbourg in the Age of Subsidiarity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngy015openalex-snapshot
The Future of the European Court of Human Rights—Subsidiarity, Process-Based Review and the Rule of Law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa047openalex-snapshot
Backlash and Judicial Restraint: Evidence From the European Court of Human Rights
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idx016openalex-snapshot
Rebalancing European Human Rights: Has the Brighton Declaration Engendered a New Deal on Human Rights in Europe?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906openalex-snapshot
The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/187119109x440870openalex-snapshot
Late Sovereign Diplomacy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120946981openalex-snapshot
Backlash against the procedural consensus
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912106openalex-snapshot
Double-Edged Diplomacy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3051027openalex-snapshot
What is a Compact? Migrants’ Rights and State Responsibilities Regarding the Design of the UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782546122openalex-snapshot
The European Court of Human Rights and its Discontents
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112338.00021openalex-snapshot
Backlash and international human rights courts

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3681988openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-22481-1_4openalex-snapshot
Constitutional Pluralism and Dissensus over Liberal Democracy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009103862openalex-snapshot
Between Forbearance and Audacity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009103862.009openalex-snapshot
Legal Change in Times of Backlash
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009103862.010openalex-snapshot
Conclusion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.55openalex-snapshot
Unlocking CEDAW's Transformative Potential: Asylum Cases Before the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/lsr.2026.10091openalex-snapshot
Backlash against rights: conceptual apparatus and research agenda
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421001143openalex-snapshot
Sovereignty, Substance, and Public Support for European Courts’ Human Rights Rulings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13619462.2025.2597771openalex-snapshot
The European Court of Human Rights, pressure-group politics, and the abolition of corporal punishment in British state schools, 1977–1986
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2023.2273652openalex-snapshot
An Unlikely Rights Revolution: Legal Mobilization in Scandinavia Since the 1970s
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viac015openalex-snapshot
Is the Public Backlash against Globalization a Backlash against Legalization and Judicialization?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huac026openalex-snapshot
The Human Rights Committee—Challenges and Prospects for Enhanced Effectiveness and Integration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12639openalex-snapshot
NGOs, international courts, and state backlash against human rights accountability: Evidence from NGO mobilization against Tanzania at the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11117/rdp.v21i111.7777openalex-snapshot
O Populismo-Nacionalista e o Backlash a Cortes Internacionais de Direitos Humanos
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120947958openalex-snapshot
Conceptualising backlash politics: Introduction to a special issue on backlash politics in comparison
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17104/0044-2348-2021-2-533openalex-snapshot
With or Without You: Suspension, Expulsion, and the Limits of Membership Sanctions in Regional Human Rights Regimes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2024.100openalex-snapshot
Understanding Gender Backlash: Southern Perspectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2024.110openalex-snapshot
Gender Equality vs ‘Morality’: The Erosion of Gender Agendas in Kenya
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3958974openalex-snapshot
Nordic Migration Cases before the UN Treaty Bodies: Pathways of International Accountability?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ytra5openalex-snapshot
Bridging the Gap: Practice Theory in Interdisciplinary International Law and International Relations Scholarship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.25914openalex-snapshot
The Human Rights Project and the Limits of Cosmopolitan Rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4000/nordiques.1518openalex-snapshot
Regime Entanglement in the Emergence of Interstitial Legal Fields: Denmark and the Uneasy Marriage of Human Rights and Migration Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.2s.2023.27openalex-snapshot
The Legal Nature of the ECHR Judgements and Their Place in the System of Sources of Economic Law of Ukraine
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5771/9783748927884-489openalex-snapshot
V. Appendix I-VII
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.62355/ejels.55649openalex-snapshot
Bringing Rights Back Home? How Judges Handle Multilayered Constitutional and International Human Rights Laws on the Supreme Court of Norway
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/b50f203bze703z476cza741z30d8e2340dc6openalex-snapshot
The costs policy of the European court of human rights : from judicialisation to judicial restraint
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.