On the public citation graph

Towards greater consistency in sentencing: Findings from a survey of Belgian magistrates

https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810381665
0 signed · 18 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33963-2_4openalex-snapshot
The Prosecution Service Function within the English Criminal Justice System
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-006-9003-8openalex-snapshot
Equality by Numbers or Words: A Comparative Study of Sentencing Structures in Minnesota and in Denmark
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139051965openalex-snapshot
Sentencing and Criminal Justice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/ccol0521674050openalex-snapshot
Sentencing and Criminal Justice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1133582openalex-snapshot
The Human Element in Justice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/839344openalex-snapshot
The Prosecutor's Discretion in The United States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4337/mllwr.1970.02.114openalex-snapshot
Rechtskundig Weekblad
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4337/mllwr.1971.01.36openalex-snapshot
Tijdschrift voor Strafrecht

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3185444openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-026-09504-xopenalex-snapshot
Virtual Judgments: Testing the Chivalry Hypothesis and Attribution Theory in AI Models
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-020-09670-6openalex-snapshot
Blame Based on One's Name? Extralegal Disparities in Criminal Conviction and Sentencing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2020.100394openalex-snapshot
Gender-based judicial ingroup bias in sex crime sentencing: Evidence from Belgium
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.09.003openalex-snapshot
Alternatives to prison for drug offenders in Belgium during the past decade
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/685756openalex-snapshot
Belgian Sentencing as a Bifurcated Practice?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/9780197646137.003.0026openalex-snapshot
Sentencing in Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520985487openalex-snapshot
Sanctions for Intimate Partner Sexual Violence: Is the Law on the Books the Law in Action?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1477370818773612openalex-snapshot
Sentencing disparities in the Czech Republic: Empirical evidence from post-communist Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820952729openalex-snapshot
A failed attempt to radically reduce inter-court sentencing disparities by legislation: Empirical evidence from Poland
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.