On the public citation graph

Chi-Squared Tests of Goodness-of-Fit For Dependent Observations

0 signed · 4 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3297797openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-009-0260-2openalex-snapshot
Neyman smooth goodness-of-fit tests for the marginal distribution of dependent data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2021.103349openalex-snapshot
The effect of LTV-based risk weights on house prices: Evidence from an Israeli macroprudential policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1214/22-ejs1993openalex-snapshot
Generalized Rescaled Pólya urn and its statistical application
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.