On the public citation graph

Policies and Initiatives Aimed at Addressing Research Misconduct in High-Income Countries

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001406
0 signed · 88 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-000-0019-xopenalex-snapshot
From case management to prevention of scientific dishonesty in Denmark
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9349-0openalex-snapshot
The Effectiveness of Ethics Education: A Quasi-Experimental Field Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0005-xopenalex-snapshot
Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49802.xopenalex-snapshot
The Responsible Conduct of Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199405193302010openalex-snapshot
Setting the Record Straight in the Breast-Cancer Trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620903065350openalex-snapshot
International Standards for Research Integrity: An Idea Whose Time has Come?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620903190299openalex-snapshot
Research Misconduct Policies of Scientific Journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2012.638597openalex-snapshot
Promoting Research on Research Integrity in Canada
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621003641181openalex-snapshot
Research Misconduct Policies of Social Science Journals and Impact Factor
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420903035380openalex-snapshot
A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368246.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Responsible Conduct of Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31812f764copenalex-snapshot
What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists??? Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31812f7e58openalex-snapshot
Scientific Societies and Promotion of the Responsible Conduct of Research: Codes, Policies, and Education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e318260fe5copenalex-snapshot
Do U.S. Research Institutions Meet or Exceed Federal Mandates for Instruction in Responsible Conduct of Research? A National Survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2749726openalex-snapshot
Book Review: Responsible Conduct of Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1134/s1061934811060190openalex-snapshot
Singapore statement on research integrity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.4.1.25openalex-snapshot
General Medical Council
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7214.926openalex-snapshot
Book: The Baltimore Case: A Trial of Politics, Science, and Character
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2677openalex-snapshot
Research bodies try to strengthen the integrity of UK research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001315openalex-snapshot
Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051928openalex-snapshot
Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500x.72371openalex-snapshot
Committee on publication ethics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.978-1-907643-44-6_37openalex-snapshot
The Skeptical Environmentalist

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2550008openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.17195openalex-snapshot
Preprint Servers’ Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_392-1openalex-snapshot
Scientific Misconduct
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_392openalex-snapshot
Scientific Misconduct
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39320-4_15openalex-snapshot
Mathematics and the World Wide Web
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1284-1_58openalex-snapshot
Research Integrity: Responsible Conduct of Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9525-4openalex-snapshot
Post-Approval Monitoring and Oversight of U.S.-Initiated Human Subjects Research in Resource-Constrained Countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6openalex-snapshot
Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9767-0openalex-snapshot
Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00257-7openalex-snapshot
Institutional Approaches to Research Integrity in Ghana
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40778-016-0064-2openalex-snapshot
A Primer on Ethics Education for Stem Cell and Biomedical Scientists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-23655-6.00002-2openalex-snapshot
Critical reflections on the nature of the scientific process for physiologists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108582322.064openalex-snapshot
Research in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316831748.004openalex-snapshot
Research Methodology and Research Governance in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-021-01866-zopenalex-snapshot
The importance of trustworthiness: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39928-zopenalex-snapshot
Favorable research environment is a key determinant of research integrity according to a ten-country survey across Central and Eastern Europe
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2015.1114745openalex-snapshot
Dishonest Conformity in Peer Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2013.822262openalex-snapshot
Global Research Integrity in Relation to the United States' Research-Integrity Infrastructure
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.955608openalex-snapshot
Book Review: A Review ofResearch Misconduct Policy in Biomedicine: Beyond the Bad-Apple Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.958218openalex-snapshot
An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2017.1287567openalex-snapshot
Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2018.1554444openalex-snapshot
Whistle blowing and research integrity: Potential remedy for research misconduct in Malaysian institutions of higher education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1732824openalex-snapshot
Academic research integrity: Exploring researchers’ perceptions of responsibilities and enablers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.2018306openalex-snapshot
Perceptions of plagiarism among PhDs across the sciences, engineering, humanities, and arts: Results from a national survey in Brazil
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1174642openalex-snapshot
Is Social Work Evidence-based? Does Saying So Make It So? Ongoing Challenges in Integrating Research, Practice and Policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Responsible Conduct of Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.002.0003openalex-snapshot
Copyright Page
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.002.0005openalex-snapshot
Preface to the Fourth Edition
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0001openalex-snapshot
Scientific Research and Ethics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Misconduct in Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Data Acquisition and Management
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Collaboration within Academia and with Industry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Authorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Publication and Peer Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Intellectual Property
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0008openalex-snapshot
Conflicts of Interest and Scientific Objectivity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0009openalex-snapshot
Mentoring and the Research Environment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0010openalex-snapshot
The Use of Animals in Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0011openalex-snapshot
The Protection of Human Subjects in Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0012openalex-snapshot
Science and Social Responsibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197547090.003.0013openalex-snapshot
Conclusion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/fjc.0000000000000443openalex-snapshot
Preventing Publication of Falsified and Fabricated Data: Roles of Scientists, Editors, Reviewers, and Readers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-04-2024-0228openalex-snapshot
Unearthing the misconduct and inaccuracies in social science research: a trend analysis of retracted articles based on retraction watch database
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117248openalex-snapshot
Multilevel barriers and facilitators to the development and implementation of research integrity policies in healthcare research institutions: a Mixed-methods systematic review protocol
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.33.298.17008openalex-snapshot
Advancing research integrity: a programme to embed good practice in Africa
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2019.010201openalex-snapshot
Correcting duplicate publications: follow up study of MEDLINE tagged duplications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020945753openalex-snapshot
Causes of the plagiarism: A grounded theory study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1556264620927628openalex-snapshot
Defining and Handling Research Misconduct: A Comparison Between Chinese and European Institutional Policies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/25902547261453178openalex-snapshot
Ghost Authorship, Guest Authorship, and Insider Peer Review: Unveiling Ethical Gaps and Loopholes in Academic Publishing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-42openalex-snapshot
Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0020-9openalex-snapshot
Critical evaluation of the guidelines of the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity and of their application
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00103-1openalex-snapshot
Survey study of research integrity officers’ perceptions of research practices associated with instances of research misconduct
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00106-yopenalex-snapshot
Estimating the prevalence of text overlap in biomedical conference abstracts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004388openalex-snapshot
Ten Simple Rules for Protecting Research Integrity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001408openalex-snapshot
Getting Closer to a Fully Correctable and Connected Research Literature
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v121/i2/205-209openalex-snapshot
A Narrative on The Fabrication of Results in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2022.13.1.10928openalex-snapshot
Indigenous Engagement in Health Research in Circumpolar Countries: An Analysis of Existing Ethical Guidelines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-15714/v1openalex-snapshot
An elaboration on the causes of plagiarism in Iran: a grounded theory study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1247554openalex-snapshot
University Students’ Perceptions about Unethical Faculty Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.21.1.2025.e1139openalex-snapshot
PLÁGIO E AUTOPLÁGIO - (RE)CONHECER PARA PREVENIR: REVISÃO INTEGRATIVA
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.186227openalex-snapshot
A proposed strategy for research misconduct policy: A review on misconduct management in health research system
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_17_19openalex-snapshot
Publish ethically or perish
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2016.02openalex-snapshot
Research Misconduct: The Peril of Publish or Perish
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5772/64947openalex-snapshot
Ethical Publications in Medical Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13671071openalex-snapshot
Additional file 1 of Estimating the prevalence of text overlap in biomedical conference abstracts
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.