On the public citation graph

Less Work, Less Respect: Authors' Perceived Importance of Research Contributions and Their Declared Contributions to Research Articles

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020206
0 signed · 39 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.217openalex-snapshot
What Are the Factors Determining Authorship and the Order of the Authors' Names?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.1.86openalex-snapshot
Authorship Criteria and Disclosure of Contributions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0599-8openalex-snapshot
Quantification of Authors’ Contributions and Eligibility for Authorship: Randomized Study in a General Medical Journal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90011-7openalex-snapshot
On the consistency between attitudes and behavior: Look to the method of attitude formation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2004.08.004openalex-snapshot
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041593openalex-snapshot
Cognitive consequences of forced compliance.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772087openalex-snapshot
Everyday Ethics in Research: Translating Authorship Guidelines into Practice in the Bench Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7033.723openalex-snapshot
Time to redefine authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009openalex-snapshot
The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.992openalex-snapshot
Authorship: time for a paradigm shift?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.009308openalex-snapshot
The scandal of unfair behaviour of senior faculty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.009449openalex-snapshot
Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.017160openalex-snapshot
Perceptions of authorship criteria: effects of student instruction and scientific experience
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1185/030079906x104885openalex-snapshot
How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: a randomized study in a general medical journal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060687openalex-snapshot
Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5123/s1679-49742006000100002openalex-snapshot
Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2434327openalex-extracted
The Anatomy of Teams: Division of Labor and Allocation of Credit in Collaborative Knowledge Production
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-025-03240-5openalex-snapshot
Recognizing fieldwork: towards equitable credit in life science research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05124-xopenalex-snapshot
The evolution of order of authorship based on researchers’ age
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.005openalex-snapshot
The sum of it all: Revealing collaboration patterns by combining authorship and acknowledgements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103987openalex-snapshot
Division of labor in collaborative knowledge production: The role of team size and interdisciplinarity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1750957openalex-snapshot
A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1860764openalex-snapshot
Contribution based author categorization to calculate author performance index
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2026.2651757openalex-snapshot
Faculty-student differences in authorship perceptions before and after authorship ethics interventions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.10.22276195openalex-snapshot
Exploring the knowledge and acceptance of reputed Authorship Criteria: A Pilot Study among medical researchers in India
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036899openalex-snapshot
Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/jmepb-2026-000322openalex-snapshot
Forward to the past: let us revive contributorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2021-0103openalex-snapshot
Ten strategies for avoiding and overcoming authorship conflicts in academic publishing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00097openalex-snapshot
Investigating the division of scientific labor using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-189openalex-snapshot
Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0057-zopenalex-snapshot
Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179956openalex-snapshot
Author contributions to ecological publications: What does it mean to be an author in modern ecological research?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183632openalex-snapshot
How do research faculty in the biosciences evaluate paper authorship criteria?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184601openalex-snapshot
The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s87585openalex-snapshot
Ongoing ethical issues concerning authorship in biomedical journals: an integrative review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ja4u2openalex-snapshot
Researchers’ Perceptions of the State of Social and Personality Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3386/w22241openalex-snapshot
The Division of Labor in Teams: A Conceptual Framework and Application to Collaborations in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v67i3.1355openalex-snapshot
Paternité des articles et intérêts concurrents : une analyse des recommandations aux auteurs des journaux traitant de pratique pharmaceutique
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.11383abstractopenalex-snapshot
The Anatomy of Teams: Division of Labor in Collaborative Knowledge Production
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.