On the public citation graph

A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023477
0 signed · 512 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03510300044036openalex-snapshot
The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041openalex-snapshot
When Authorship Fails
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.278.7.579openalex-snapshot
When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.216openalex-snapshot
Authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.217openalex-snapshot
What Are the Factors Determining Authorship and the Order of the Authors' Names?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.219openalex-snapshot
Multiple Authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.222openalex-snapshot
Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2769openalex-snapshot
Prevalence of Honorary and Ghost Authorship in Cochrane Reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2817openalex-snapshot
How Statistical Expertise Is Used in Medical Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.1.86openalex-snapshot
Authorship Criteria and Disclosure of Contributions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20380openalex-snapshot
What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21164openalex-snapshot
Loads of special authorship functions: Linear growth in the percentage of “equal first authors” and corresponding authors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22528openalex-snapshot
Association between pharmaceutical involvement and outcomes in breast cancer clinical trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770040208openalex-snapshot
Research publication credit assignment: Nurses' views
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02639320openalex-snapshot
Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00022268openalex-snapshot
Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-010-9119-7openalex-snapshot
Authorship in Student-Faculty Collaborative Research: Perceptions of Current and Best Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0773-yopenalex-snapshot
Prescribed practices of authorship: review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0599-8openalex-snapshot
Quantification of Authors’ Contributions and Eligibility for Authorship: Randomized Study in a General Medical Journal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0017-2openalex-snapshot
Coauthorship in physics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0007-7openalex-snapshot
Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0006-yopenalex-snapshot
A case for a duty to feed the hungry: GM plants and the third world
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9271-5openalex-snapshot
A Broader Discussion of Authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9272-4openalex-snapshot
Responsible Authorship in Engineering Fields: An Overview of Current Ethical Challenges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9275-1openalex-snapshot
Teaching Authorship and Publication Practices in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9280-4openalex-snapshot
Authorship and Publication Practices in the Social Sciences: Historical Reflections on Current Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9281-3openalex-snapshot
Overview: Underserved Areas of Education in the Responsible Conduct of Research: Authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0061-2openalex-snapshot
The authorship list in science: Junior physicists’ perceptions of who appears and why
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90299-2openalex-snapshot
Equity in authorship: A strategy for assigning credit when publishing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.08.004openalex-snapshot
“Equal” Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2009.09.001openalex-snapshot
Honorary Coauthorship: Does it Matter?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.010openalex-snapshot
Changing author counts in five major general medicine journals: effect of author contribution forms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.010openalex-snapshot
What is in a name? Credit assignment practices in different disciplines
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.002openalex-snapshot
Scientific authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.013openalex-snapshot
Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.04.004openalex-snapshot
Identification of factors that influence authorship name placement and decisions to collaborate in peer-reviewed, education-related publications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.024openalex-snapshot
Authorship patterns of surgical chairs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-1333(00)00140-3openalex-snapshot
Co-authorship in the academic library literature: A survey of attitudes and behaviors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-5371(01)00054-9openalex-snapshot
Contribution, attribution and the allocation of intellectual property rights: economics versus agricultural economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1387-2656(03)09009-4openalex-snapshot
Review of current authorship guidelines and the controversy regarding publication of clinical trial data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.36.5.524openalex-snapshot
Ethical issues and the assignment of publication credit.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.37.9.996openalex-snapshot
Collaborative research and publication in psychology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814openalex-snapshot
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.23.3.203openalex-snapshot
Ethical issues in the supervision of student research: A study of critical incidents.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3918.1.3.184openalex-snapshot
Doctoral students' beliefs about authorship credit for dissertations.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029769openalex-snapshot
Assignment of publication credits: Ethics and practices of psychologists.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/2281356a0openalex-snapshot
Citation Idiosyncrasies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/2281357a0openalex-snapshot
Citation Idiosyncrasies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/454574aopenalex-snapshot
Integrity: Croatia's standards unusual in much of Europe
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500427007openalex-snapshot
Alphabetized coauthorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772087openalex-snapshot
Everyday Ethics in Research: Translating Authorship Guidelines into Practice in the Bench Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1997.10116865openalex-snapshot
Ethical Questions regarding Joint Authorship: Business and Nonbusiness Faculty Perceptions on Noncontributing Authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620701670187openalex-snapshot
Authorship and Publication Practices: Evaluation of the Effect of Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction to Postdoctoral Trainees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2010.493094openalex-snapshot
Influences on Authorship Issues: An Evaluation of Receiving, Not Receiving, and Rejecting Credit
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2010.512857openalex-snapshot
Credit and Authorship Practices: Educational and Environmental Influences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621003791986openalex-snapshot
Influences on Authorship Issues: An Evaluation of Giving Credit
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1997.10778893openalex-snapshot
Authorship and Collaboration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420701378057openalex-snapshot
Authorship Decision Making: An Empirical Investigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/20786204.2005.10873220openalex-snapshot
Authorship: practices and experiences in the Faculty of Health Sciences of the University of the Free State
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/224641openalex-snapshot
Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/250082openalex-snapshot
First‐Author Conditions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1087/20100406openalex-snapshot
Authorship conflict in Bangladesh: an exploratory study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199309000-00015openalex-snapshot
Patterns of authorship among chairmen of departments of medicine
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199805000-00019openalex-snapshot
The amount of small-group case-study discussion needed to improve moral reasoning skills of medical students
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-199811000-00010openalex-snapshot
From Authorship to Contributorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000100282.03466.2copenalex-snapshot
Interpreting Authorship Order and Corresponding Authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.105.032001openalex-snapshot
First Measurement of Bose-Einstein Correlations in Proton-Proton Collisions at s=0.9 and 2.36 TeV at the LHC
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580510622379openalex-snapshot
Contribution, attribution and the assignment of intellectual property rights in economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024320openalex-snapshot
The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00220openalex-snapshot
Data Sharing in Medical Research: An Empirical Investigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00738.xopenalex-snapshot
How Do Journal Quality, Co‐Authorship, and Author Order Affect Agricultural Economists' Salaries?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00046.xopenalex-snapshot
Determination of Authorship Credit in Published Dissertations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00653.xopenalex-snapshot
The Benefits of Being Economics Professor A (rather than Z)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1987.tb00610.xopenalex-snapshot
Nurse Educator Views of Assignment of Authorship Credits
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01211.xopenalex-snapshot
REFLECTIONS ON THE INTERSECTION OF POWER AND COMPETITION IN REFLECTING TEAMS AS APPLIED TO ACADEMIC SETTINGS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1482openalex-snapshot
Survey of fulfilment of criteria for authorship in published medical research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009openalex-snapshot
The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1460openalex-snapshot
The A to Z of authorship: analysis of influence of initial letter of surname on order of authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d284openalex-snapshot
Is research safe in their hands?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.009449openalex-snapshot
Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.017160openalex-snapshot
Perceptions of authorship criteria: effects of student instruction and scientific experience
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.024299openalex-snapshot
A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.028324openalex-snapshot
Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2261011255openalex-snapshot
Researcher Contributions and Fulfillment of ICMJE Authorship Criteria: Analysis of Author Contribution Lists in Research Articles with Multiple Authors Published inRadiology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/008124639902900308openalex-snapshot
Authorship Credit in Supervisor-Student Collaboration: Assessing the Dilemma in Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945905274906openalex-snapshot
Ethical Issues Faced By Nursing Editors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475305279951openalex-snapshot
Marketing Journal Coauthorships: An Empirical Analysis of Coauthor Behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370404900905openalex-snapshot
Prevalence and Outcomes of Pharmaceutical Industry—Sponsored Clinical Trials Involving Clozapine, Risperidone, or Olanzapine
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1185/030079906x104885openalex-snapshot
How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: a randomized study in a general medical journal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-21openalex-snapshot
Authors' opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.106.024547openalex-snapshot
Influence of drug company authorship and sponsorship on drug trial outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.21.6606openalex-snapshot
Relationships Between Authorship Contributions and Authors' Industry Financial Ties Among Oncology Clinical Trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb0801_5openalex-snapshot
Do Authorship Policies Impact Students' Judgments of Perceived Wrongdoing?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5openalex-snapshot
Faculty-Student Collaborations: Ethics and Satisfaction in Authorship Credit
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/089533006776526085openalex-snapshot
What's in a Surname? The Effects of Surname Initials on Academic Success
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0406openalex-snapshot
Research Note—The Researcher as a Consumer of Scientific Publications: How Do Name-Ordering Conventions Affect Inferences About Contribution Credits?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1300/j079v32n02_04openalex-snapshot
Ethical Beliefs of Social Work Researchers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1d267openalex-snapshot
Industry Sponsorship and Authorship of Clinical Trials Over 20 Years
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010x502733openalex-snapshot
How to do a meta‐analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040019openalex-snapshot
Ghost Authorship in Industry-Initiated Randomised Trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000230openalex-snapshot
Ghostwriting at Elite Academic Medical Centers in the United States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738openalex-snapshot
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060687openalex-snapshot
Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.23openalex-snapshot
Researchers' Perspectives on Collective/Community Co-Authorship in Community-Based Participatory Indigenous Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[435:aieaaa]2.0.co;2openalex-snapshot
Authorship in ecology: attribution, accountability, and responsibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200308000-00024openalex-snapshot
WHO DID WHAT?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.3.8751654openalex-snapshot
Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1349450openalex-snapshot
Citations and Individuals: First Authorship across the Alphabet
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2091086openalex-snapshot
Nobel Laureates in Science: Patterns of Productivity, Collaboration, and Authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/256001openalex-snapshot
Ethical Standards Within Organizational Behavior.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3121515openalex-snapshot
The Development of Social Knowledge. Morality and Convention
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2004.19.4.413openalex-snapshot
An Examination of Ethical Research Conduct by Experienced and Novice Accounting Academics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2310/6650.2007.06044openalex-snapshot
The Meaning of Author Order in Medical Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.179openalex-snapshot
Psychology of the Scientist: LXVII. Assignment of Authorship Credit in Psychological Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2000.86.3.771openalex-snapshot
PSYCHOLOGY OF THE SCIENTIST: LXXX. ATTITUDES REGARDING AUTHORSHIP ISSUES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL PUBLICATIONS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.25504/fairsharing.a217dbopenalex-snapshot
FAIRsharing record for: Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct Final Rule
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20040601-03openalex-snapshot
Perceptions of Nursing Faculty Regarding Ethical Issues in Nursing Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0011.105openalex-snapshot
When Authorship Isn’t Enough: Lessons from CERN on the Implications of Formal and Informal Credit Attribution Mechanisms in Collaborative Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0291openalex-snapshot
Effects of Author Contribution Disclosures and Numeric Limitations on Authorship Trends
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.60.1.111openalex-snapshot
Authorship Issues: One Research Center’s Experience With Developing Author Guidelines
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5175/jswe.2005.200300356openalex-snapshot
AUTHORSHIP CREDIT: A NATIONAL STUDY OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATORS' BELIEFS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5465/256709openalex-snapshot
"ONLY IF I'M FIRST AUTHOR": CONFLICT OVER CREDIT IN MANAGEMENT SCHOLARSHIP.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.24.4.5openalex-snapshot
Authorship of Health Education Articles: Guests, Ghosts, and Trends
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-130-8-199904200-00013openalex-snapshot
Disclosure of Researcher Contributions: A Study of Original Research Articles in The Lancet

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2550008openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3082301openalex-extracted
Contribution Matrix: A Method to Analyze Individual Participation in Research Collaborations Developing Technologies - An Application on the Case of the Development of UPSat
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4349289openalex-extracted
Accounting Researchers’ Beliefs About Debatable Research and Authorship Practices, with Advice and Anecdotes from the Field
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4888395openalex-extracted
Using Bibliometrics to Detect Unconventional Authorship Practices and Examine Their Impact on Global Research Metrics, 2019-2023
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.mr000038openalex-snapshot
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.mr000038.pub2openalex-snapshot
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23081openalex-snapshot
Acknowledgments in scientific publications: Presence in Spanish science and text patterns across disciplines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23361openalex-snapshot
Coauthorship networks: A directed network approach considering the order and number of coauthors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4584openalex-snapshot
Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: First, last, and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1301openalex-snapshot
Historical changes in co‐author numbers in ecology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14762openalex-snapshot
Research integrity in randomized clinical trials: A scoping umbrella review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1191openalex-snapshot
Authorship order
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1415openalex-snapshot
Honorific authorship and approval of the ICMJE criteria: A survey with a convenience sample
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.277openalex-snapshot
Quantifying authorship: A comparison of authorship rubrics from five disciplines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.5463openalex-snapshot
‘A pause, and we continue’: reflection on the roadmap for the development of Veterinary Record Open
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05964-4_10openalex-snapshot
Ethical Issues in Surgical Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39905-4_10openalex-snapshot
Actual Researcher Contribution (ARC) Versus the Perceived Contribution to the Scientific Body of Knowledge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75263-7openalex-snapshot
Peer review in an Era of Evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75263-7_15openalex-snapshot
Assessing Academic Careers: The Peer Review of Professorial Candidates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86201-5_5openalex-snapshot
Codes of Ethics and Research Integrity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04895-1_3openalex-snapshot
Ethical and Practical Considerations for Completing and Supervising a Prospective PhD by Publication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22412-6openalex-snapshot
A Guide to Responsible Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22412-6_7openalex-snapshot
Publication and Dissemination of Research Results
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22412-6_9openalex-snapshot
How to Deal with Allegations of Misconduct
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29455-6_4openalex-snapshot
Ethics of Authorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29455-6_7openalex-snapshot
A Priori Publication Agreements to Improve Adherence to Ethics in Research Publications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29717-5_14openalex-snapshot
Ontology-Based Exploratory Text Analysis as a Tool for Identification of Research Trends in Polish Universities of Economics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51277-8_3openalex-snapshot
Issues of Authorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7062-4_17openalex-snapshot
Manuscript Preparation: The ICMJE Recommendations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4060-4_1openalex-snapshot
Bylines and Beyond: Unpacking Authorship in Research Publications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05733-8openalex-snapshot
Are critical care authors publication dealers?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05226-8openalex-snapshot
Writing for “International Orthopaedics”: authorship, fraud, and ethical concerns
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2582-2openalex-snapshot
Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4314-2openalex-snapshot
Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major spine journals during a 10-year period
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01178-7openalex-snapshot
Theoretical and empirical approach to how a professorship is organized in the German higher education system and how the organizational process works
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9305-6openalex-snapshot
Gatekeepers of Reward: a Pilot Study on the Ethics of Editing and Competing Evaluations of Value
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09375-0openalex-snapshot
Responsible Conduct of Research and Ethical Publishing Practices: A Proposal to Resolve ‘Authorship Disputes’ over Multi-Author Paper Publication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09435-zopenalex-snapshot
Biomedical Authorship: Common Misconducts and Possible Scenarios for Disputes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09465-1openalex-snapshot
Misuse of co-authorship in Medical PhD Theses in Scandinavia: A Questionnaire Survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09520-zopenalex-snapshot
Minimizing Questionable Research Practices – The Role of Norms, Counter Norms, and Micro-Organizational Ethics Discussion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09592-xopenalex-snapshot
Consortium Authorship: Ethical Tensions in Emerging Authorship Practices in Interdisciplinary Collaborative Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09656-6openalex-snapshot
Questionable Practices Concerning Authorship and Their Prevalence: An Umbrella Review of Evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09713-0openalex-snapshot
The Ethics of Authorship: Exploring Gift Authorship in Faculty Member
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9303-zopenalex-snapshot
Dueling Co-Authors: How Collaborators Create and Sometimes Solve Contributorship Conflicts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9363-3openalex-snapshot
The Perception of Scientific Authorship Across Domains
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0773-yopenalex-snapshot
Prescribed practices of authorship: review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1253-3openalex-snapshot
A network-based approach to coauthorship credit allocation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1391-7openalex-snapshot
Social dynamics of research collaboration: norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining co-authorship rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1491-4openalex-snapshot
The influence of R&D intensity of countries on the impact of international collaborative research: evidence from Spain
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1803-3openalex-snapshot
Adding authorship order to the quantity and quality dimensions of scholarly productivity: evidence from group- and individual-level analyses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1811-3openalex-snapshot
Academic capacity building: holding up a mirror
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1849-xopenalex-snapshot
The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1997-zopenalex-snapshot
Collaboration experiences across scientific disciplines and cohorts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2412-0openalex-snapshot
Contradicting incentives for research collaboration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2520-xopenalex-snapshot
Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2986-1openalex-snapshot
Definition of authorship in social science journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03528-zopenalex-snapshot
Gender gaps in scientific performance: a longitudinal matching study of health sciences researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03686-0openalex-snapshot
Alphabetic order of authors in scholarly publications: a bibliometric study for 27 scientific fields
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04227-zopenalex-snapshot
Homophily in higher education research: a perspective based on co-authorships
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04430-6openalex-snapshot
Gender differences among first authors in research focused on the Sustainable Development Goal of Gender Equality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04718-1openalex-snapshot
Gender disparities in accounting academia: analysis from the lens of publications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04791-6openalex-snapshot
Authorship order as an indicator of similarity between article discourse and author citation identity in informetrics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04928-1openalex-snapshot
How many authors are (too) many? A retrospective, descriptive analysis of authorship in biomedical publications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05124-xopenalex-snapshot
The evolution of order of authorship based on researchers’ age
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05428-6openalex-snapshot
Knowledge lost, parity gained? COVID-19 and gender gaps in Dutch academia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05685-zopenalex-snapshot
A compact representation of authorship-position composition and its relevance to bibliometric indicators
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05768-xopenalex-snapshot
Revealing invisible research data labor: the potential of data papers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9358-7openalex-snapshot
Medical Students’ Decisions About Authorship in Disputable Situations: Intervention Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9451-6openalex-snapshot
Ethics of Using Language Editing Services in An Era of Digital Communication and Heavily Multi-Authored Papers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6openalex-snapshot
Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3openalex-snapshot
Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9767-0openalex-snapshot
Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9987-yopenalex-snapshot
Perceptions of Ethical Climate and Research Pressures in Different Faculties of a University: Cross-Sectional Study at the University of Split, Croatia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4openalex-snapshot
Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3openalex-snapshot
Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00162-8openalex-snapshot
Accommodating an Uninvited Guest: Perspectives of Researchers in Switzerland on ‘Honorary’ Authorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00180-xopenalex-snapshot
Taiwanese Researchers’ Perceptions of Questionable Authorship Practices: An Exploratory Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00220-6openalex-snapshot
Authorship Not Taught and Not Caught in Undergraduate Research Experiences at a Research University
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00273-7openalex-snapshot
Authorship Policies at U.S. Doctoral Universities: A Review and Recommendations for Future Policies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00303-yopenalex-snapshot
How to Handle Co-authorship When Not Everyone’s Research Contributions Make It into the Paper
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00356-zopenalex-snapshot
Perceptions of Scientific Authorship Revisited: Country Differences and the Impact of Perceived Publication Pressure
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00516-xopenalex-snapshot
Authorship and Citizen Science: Seven Heuristic Rules
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12285-015-0008-3openalex-snapshot
Wissenschaftliche Integrität
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-85654-6.00053-8openalex-snapshot
Advances in ethics for the neuroscience agenda
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-90969-3.00001-3openalex-snapshot
Ethically Communicating Research Findings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-13750-1.00012-4openalex-snapshot
Publication and authorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.09.022openalex-snapshot
Authorship Ethics: A Practical Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2022.02.012openalex-snapshot
Ghost and Honorary Authorship in Ophthalmology: A Cross-Sectional Survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2024.02.006openalex-snapshot
Writing the Roadmap for Medical Practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.10.013openalex-snapshot
Factors influencing pharmacy faculty behavior, perceptions, and challenges with determining authorship credit
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsim.2025.01.007openalex-snapshot
Close-knit teams foster complex research: A case study of physics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2025.01.005openalex-snapshot
Why does cardiology have many extreme publishing authors?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.05.012openalex-snapshot
The increasing authorship trend in neuroscience: A scientometric analysis across 11 countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102300openalex-snapshot
Considering author sequence in all-author co-citation analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2022.100803openalex-snapshot
Research and publication ethics knowledge and practices in the health and life sciences: Findings from an exploratory survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008openalex-snapshot
An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.002openalex-snapshot
Alphabetization and the skewing of first authorship towards last names early in the alphabet
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.005openalex-snapshot
Rethinking the comparison of coauthorship credit allocation schemes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.08.003openalex-snapshot
National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.09.005openalex-snapshot
More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007openalex-snapshot
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.005openalex-snapshot
The sum of it all: Revealing collaboration patterns by combining authorship and acknowledgements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.001openalex-snapshot
The value and credits of n-authors publications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.010openalex-snapshot
Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.100990openalex-snapshot
Self-Citations and scientific evaluation: Leadership, influence, and performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101345openalex-snapshot
A directed collaboration network for exploring the order of scientific collaboration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.006openalex-snapshot
On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2015.11.004openalex-snapshot
Studying a boundary-defying group: An analytical review of the literature surrounding the information habits of writers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101201openalex-snapshot
Questionable authorship practices across the disciplines: Building a multidisciplinary thesaurus using evolutionary concept analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103987openalex-snapshot
Division of labor in collaborative knowledge production: The role of team size and interdisciplinarity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104466openalex-snapshot
The vexing but persistent problem of authorship misconduct in research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104927openalex-snapshot
Geography of authorship: How geography shapes authorship attribution in big team science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104935openalex-snapshot
The impact of early debut on scientists: Evidence from the Young Scientists Fund of the NSFC
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.975openalex-snapshot
Findings of the Survey on Prevention of Plagiarism in Lithuanian Research Journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2026.101268openalex-snapshot
Authorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61508-0openalex-snapshot
Can small journals provide leadership?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277426.007openalex-snapshot
Who Are the Authors of Journal Articles?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647openalex-snapshot
Research Design in Clinical Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.001openalex-snapshot
Preface
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.002openalex-snapshot
Introduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.003openalex-snapshot
Internal and External Validity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.004openalex-snapshot
Construct and Data-Evaluation Validity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.005openalex-snapshot
Ideas that Begin the Research Process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.006openalex-snapshot
Experimental Research Using Group Designs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.007openalex-snapshot
Control and Comparison Groups
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.008openalex-snapshot
Case-Control and Cohort Designs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.009openalex-snapshot
Single-Case Experimental Research Designs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.010openalex-snapshot
Qualitative Research Methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.011openalex-snapshot
Selecting Measures for Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.012openalex-snapshot
Assessment: Types of Measures and Their Use
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.013openalex-snapshot
Special Topics of Assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.014openalex-snapshot
Null Hypothesis Significance Testing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.015openalex-snapshot
Presenting and Analyzing the Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.016openalex-snapshot
Cautions, Negative Effects, and Replication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.017openalex-snapshot
Ethical Issues and Guidelines for Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.018openalex-snapshot
Scientific Integrity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.019openalex-snapshot
Communication of Research Findings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.020openalex-snapshot
Methodology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.021openalex-snapshot
Glossary
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.022openalex-snapshot
References
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.024openalex-snapshot
Name Index
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993647.025openalex-snapshot
Subject Index
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139626491.017openalex-snapshot
What Does Authorship Mean?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2018-1291.ch003openalex-snapshot
Contributorship and Authorship Hierarchy as a Form of Credit
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2018-1291.ch013openalex-snapshot
Authorship in Undergraduate Research Partnerships: A Really Bad Tango Between Undergraduate Protégés and Graduate Student Mentors While Waiting for Professor Godot
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2018-1295.ch010openalex-snapshot
Coordination of the Chemistry REU Program at the University of Nebraska−Lincoln
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/14805-029openalex-snapshot
Single-case experimental research designs.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001216openalex-snapshot
Exponential authorship inflation in neuroscience and psychology from the 1950s to the 2020s.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26027-yopenalex-snapshot
Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10550-3openalex-snapshot
Cooperation conflicts with equality when allocating public goods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54909-wopenalex-snapshot
Honorary authorship is highly prevalent in health sciences: systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55966-xopenalex-snapshot
Automatically listing senior members of departments as co-authors is highly prevalent in health sciences: meta-analysis of survey research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1774394openalex-snapshot
Perspectives of Resident and Attending Ophthalmologists on Common Ethical Dilemmas in Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2012.16openalex-snapshot
Collaboration and Competition in Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2531268123openalex-snapshot
Creating a responsible authorship culture in science: Anchoring authorship practices in principles of transparency, credit, and accountability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2018.1451832openalex-snapshot
Substantial contribution and accountability: best authorship practices for medical writers in biomedical publications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2019.1608101openalex-snapshot
Ghostwriting in biomedicine: a review of the published literature
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2022.2083403openalex-snapshot
Mapping author taxonomies and author criteria: good practices for thinking through complex authorship situations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1405256openalex-snapshot
Co-authorship trends in English literary studies, 1995–2015
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2016.1255213openalex-snapshot
Best practice for community-based management of postnatal depression in developing countries: A systematic review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2625580openalex-snapshot
Addressing free rider issues in academic authorship in medical education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2015.1114745openalex-snapshot
Dishonest Conformity in Peer Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1150542openalex-snapshot
Alternative Policies for Collaborative Publishing in Natural Resource Journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2010.493094openalex-snapshot
Influences on Authorship Issues: An Evaluation of Receiving, Not Receiving, and Rejecting Credit
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.968277openalex-snapshot
Rethinking Authorship in the Era of Collaborative Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2015.1047707openalex-snapshot
Authorship Issues and Conflict in the U.S. Academic Chemical Community
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1251320openalex-snapshot
Honorary Authorship Practices in Environmental Science Teams: Structural and Cultural Factors and Solutions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1276452openalex-snapshot
Curricular Approaches in Research Ethics Education: Reflecting on More and Less Effective Practices in Instructional Content
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2017.1287567openalex-snapshot
Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2017.1386565openalex-snapshot
All for one or one for all? Authorship and the cross-sectoral valuation of credit in nutrition science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2018.1485493openalex-snapshot
Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1721288openalex-snapshot
The norms of authorship credit: Challenging the definition of authorship in The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1750957openalex-snapshot
A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1756787openalex-snapshot
Civil disobedience in scientific authorship: Resistance and insubordination in science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1794855openalex-snapshot
Authorship and justice: Credit and responsibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1804374openalex-snapshot
Authorship stories panel discussion: Fostering ethical authorship by cultivating a growth mindset
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1860764openalex-snapshot
Contribution based author categorization to calculate author performance index
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.2002693openalex-snapshot
Reducing tensions and expediting manuscript submission via an authorship agreement for early-career researchers: A pilot study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2094256openalex-snapshot
Time-based changes in authorship trend in research-intensive universities in Malaysia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2140587openalex-snapshot
Authorship climate: A new tool for studying ethical issues in authorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2239532openalex-snapshot
Is requiring Research Integrity Advisors a useful policy for improving research integrity? A census of advisors in Australia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2322557openalex-snapshot
Group authorship, an excellent opportunity laced with ethical, legal and technical challenges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2026.2651757openalex-snapshot
Faculty-student differences in authorship perceptions before and after authorship ethics interventions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2026.2747675openalex-snapshot
An ethical analysis of student–faculty co‑authorships in manuscripts derived from PhD dissertations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621003791986openalex-snapshot
Influences on Authorship Issues: An Evaluation of Giving Credit
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.2004701openalex-snapshot
HCI Research in the Middle East and North Africa: A Bibliometric and Socioeconomic Overview
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2019.1566481openalex-snapshot
The State of Authorship in Criminology: Perceptions of Right and Order among Elite Criminologists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2026.2654001openalex-snapshot
The H2G Index: A Novel Bibliometric Tool for Quantifying Mentorship Impact
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1276948openalex-snapshot
Network of Ethical Relationships model for global North–South population health research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2021.1971277openalex-snapshot
Reimagining authorship guidelines to promote equity in co-produced academic collaborations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/24711616.2017.1282760openalex-snapshot
Twenty Years of Authorship, Sampling, and References in Kinesiology Research Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/715539openalex-snapshot
What’s the Point of Authors?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/ae/tmad035openalex-snapshot
Should We Add Them? Asking Better Questions about Authorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/anncom/wlaf020openalex-snapshot
Navigating gender disparities in communication research leadership: academic recognition, career development, and compensation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae073openalex-snapshot
Scientific collaborative within-group conduct, data-sharing, and publication agreements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihaa073openalex-snapshot
Decolonising global health: transnational research partnerships under the spotlight
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jama/9780190246556.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Ethical and Legal Considerations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab026openalex-snapshot
Integrating Qualitative Methods and Open Science: Five Principles for More Trustworthy Research*
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192899798.013.27openalex-snapshot
Open Innovation in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvag004openalex-snapshot
Artificial intelligence in academic practices and policy discourses across ‘Big 5’ publishers
showing the first 200 of 388 · page through all 388
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.