Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository
metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is
labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not
evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
Share the code, not just the data: A case study of the reproducibility of articles published in the Journal of Memory and Language under the open data policy
Understanding the data‐sharing debate in the context of Aotearoa/New Zealand: a narrative review on the perspectives of funders, publishers/journals, researchers, participants and Māori collectives
Blinded by the Light: How a Focus on Statistical “Significance” May Causep-Value Misreporting and an Excess ofp-Values Just Below .05 in Communication Science
Ovarian stimulation strategies for intrauterine insemination in couples with unexplained infertility: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
Quality of reporting of prospective in vivo and ex vivo studies published in the Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care over a 10‐year period (2009–2019)
Short email with attachment versus long email without attachment when contacting authors to request unpublished data for a systematic review: a nested randomised trial
Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science
showing the first 200 of 401
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.