On the public citation graph

Supremely Fallible? A Debate on Judicial Restraint and Activism in Pakistan

https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2015-0205

0 signed · 10 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906openalex-snapshot

The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3126641openalex-extracted

A Review on Judicial Activism in Pakistan

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4399668openalex-extracted

Prerogative Writs as Constitutional Transfer

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49884-3_3openalex-snapshot

Judicial Independence in Pakistan

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15170/dike.2021.05.02.15openalex-snapshot

Judicial Independence in Pakistan

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.47067/real.v3i1.16openalex-snapshot

Evolution and Exercise of the Power of Judicial Review of Executive Actions in Pakistan

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.52337/pjia.v5i4.653openalex-snapshot

A REVIEW ON THE CONSEQUENCES OVER: ACHIEVING JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN PAKISTAN

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.52700/pjh.v4i1.140openalex-snapshot

Historiographical contextualization of Pakistan's regime hybridity and Political judicialization: Paradox of Coadjutant or Wrangle

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.55327/jaash.v10i4.354openalex-snapshot

POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION: USA AND BANGLADESH

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.61506/01.00244openalex-snapshot

Analysis of Judicial Review: The Role of Higher Courts in Assessing Legislative and Executive Actions in the Context of Pakistan

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.