On the public citation graph

Identifying the Causes of Low Participation Rates in Conservation Tenders

https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000098
0 signed · 132 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20007openalex-snapshot
Using laboratory experiments for policymaking: An example from the Georgia irrigation reduction auction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-007-9009-yopenalex-snapshot
Assessment of the Water Quality and Ecosystem Health of the Great Barrier Reef (Australia): Conceptual Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0702-xopenalex-snapshot
Practitioner versus participant perspectives on conservation tenders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9461-2openalex-snapshot
A Uniform Price Auction for Conservation Easements in the Canadian Prairies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9830-8openalex-snapshot
Uniform-Price Reverse Auction for Estimating the Costs of Reducing Open-Field Burning of Rice Residue in Nepal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.09.007openalex-snapshot
Using auction mechanisms to reveal costs for water quality improvements in Great Barrier Reef catchments in Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.08.025openalex-snapshot
Rewarding farmers for delivering vascular plant diversity in managed grasslands: A transdisciplinary case-study approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.016openalex-snapshot
A science-driven market-based instrument for determining the cost of environmental services: A comparison of two catchments in Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.029openalex-snapshot
Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.032openalex-snapshot
Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.007openalex-snapshot
Public transaction costs of agri-environmental schemes and their determinants—Analysing stakeholders' involvement and perceptions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.021openalex-snapshot
Context Matters: Exploring the Cost-effectiveness of Fixed Payments and Procurement Auctions for PES
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.11.001openalex-snapshot
Designing conservation tenders to support landholder participation: A framework and case study assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.017openalex-snapshot
How auctions to allocate payments for ecosystem services contracts impact social equity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.010openalex-snapshot
Drivers of landholder participation in tender programs for Australian biodiversity conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.016openalex-snapshot
Framing the private land conservation conversation: Strategic framing of the benefits of conservation participation could increase landholder engagement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003openalex-snapshot
Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.11.008openalex-snapshot
Market mechanism or subsidy in disguise? Governing payment for environmental services in Costa Rica
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.003openalex-snapshot
Sustainable participation behaviour in agri-environmental measures
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2003.06.001openalex-snapshot
Voluntary conservation of endangered species: when does no regulatory assurance mean no conservation?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.05.001openalex-snapshot
Buybacks with costly participation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.006openalex-snapshot
Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.003openalex-snapshot
Personal circumstances and social characteristics as determinants of landholder participation in biodiversity conservation programs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.049openalex-snapshot
Understanding why landholders choose to participate or withdraw from conservation programs: A case study from a Queensland conservation auction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2016.08.003openalex-snapshot
Using conservation auctions informed by environmental performance models to reduce agricultural nutrient flows into Lake Erie
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.04.001openalex-snapshot
Participation in biodiversity conservation: Motivations and barriers of Australian landholders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.008openalex-snapshot
Social dimensions of procurement auctions for environmental service contracts: Evaluating tradeoffs between cost-effectiveness and participation by the poor in rural Tanzania
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.011openalex-snapshot
Landowners and conservation markets: Social benefits from two Australian government programs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.004openalex-snapshot
Investigating the influence of the institutional organisation of agri-environmental schemes on scheme adoption
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.023openalex-snapshot
Determinants of cost-effectiveness in tender and offset programmes for Australian biodiversity conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.010openalex-snapshot
Collective action vs. conservation auction: Lessons from a social experiment of a collective auction of water conservation contracts in Japan
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.037openalex-snapshot
The Australian experience in using tenders for conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.005openalex-snapshot
The role of policy priorities and targeting in the spatial location of participation in Agri-Environmental Schemes in Emilia-Romagna (Italy)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.016openalex-snapshot
An experimental examination of target based conservation auctions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.011openalex-snapshot
Institutional constraints on conservation auction: Organizational mandate, competencies and practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.035openalex-snapshot
An overview of laboratory research on conservation auctions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.017openalex-snapshot
The US Conservation Reserve Program: The evolution of an enrollment mechanism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.019openalex-snapshot
European farms’ participation in agri-environmental measures
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.022openalex-snapshot
Auction winning, social dynamics and non-compliance in a payment for ecosystem services scheme in Indonesia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.029openalex-snapshot
Conservation tenders in developed and developing countries − status quo, challenges and prospects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.026openalex-snapshot
Farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes: Regionalisation and the role of bridging social capital
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.026openalex-snapshot
Conservation tenders in low-income countries: Opportunities and challenges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.067openalex-snapshot
Who participates in conservation incentive programs? Absentee and group landholders are in the mix
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0743-0167(99)00066-2openalex-snapshot
Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: a transactional perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892911000385openalex-snapshot
Implementing and evaluating the effectiveness of a payment scheme for environmental services from agricultural land
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892911000397openalex-snapshot
Cost-effectiveness targeting under multiple conservation goals and equity considerations in the Andes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1068280500007437openalex-snapshot
Applying Optimization and the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Enhance Agricultural Preservation Strategies in the State of Delaware
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1068280500007619openalex-snapshot
Economics and Environmental Markets: Lessons from Water-Quality Trading
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0033-0openalex-snapshot
The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/ea05037openalex-snapshot
Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/rj08042openalex-snapshot
A conservation auction for landscape linkage in the southern Desert Uplands, Queensland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.644401openalex-snapshot
An auction scheme for land use change in Sichuan Province, China
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2013.807210openalex-snapshot
Acquiring Water for the Environment: Lessons from Natural Resources Management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aav017openalex-snapshot
To Bid or Not to Bid: The Role of Participation Rates in Conservation Auction Outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaw071openalex-snapshot
Too Burdensome to Bid: Transaction Costs and Pay‐for‐Performance Conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/56.2.201openalex-snapshot
Conservation Contracts for Forest Biodiversity: Theory and Experience from Finland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grs002openalex-snapshot
How should we incentivize private landowners to 'produce' more biodiversity?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12049openalex-snapshot
Agri‐environmental auctions for phosphorus load reduction: experiences from a F innish pilot
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12098openalex-snapshot
Factors influencing farmers’ participation in contractual biodiversity conservation: a choice experiment with northern Australian pastoralists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12005openalex-snapshot
Auction Design, Incentives, and Buying Back Maryland and Virginia Crab Licenses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12028openalex-snapshot
Does It Pay to Increase Competition in Combinatorial Conservation Auctions?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12278openalex-snapshot
Combining Auctions and Performance‐Based Payments in a Forest Enrichment Field Trial in Western Kenya
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12778openalex-snapshot
How economics can further the success of ecological restoration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00666.xopenalex-snapshot
Auction Design for Voluntary Conservation Programs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00813.xopenalex-snapshot
How Cost‐Effective Are Land Retirement Auctions? Estimating the Difference between Payments and Willingness to Accept in the Conservation Reserve Program
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2003.t01-1-00224.xopenalex-snapshot
Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00417.xopenalex-snapshot
Exploring the cost effectiveness of land conservation auctions and payment policies*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00554.xopenalex-snapshot
The primacy of human capital and social capital in influencing landholders’ participation in programmes designed to improve environmental outcomes*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00557.xopenalex-snapshot
Testing for allocation efficiencies in water quality tenders across catchments, industries and pollutants: a north Queensland case study*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.xopenalex-snapshot
Factors Affecting European Farmers' Participation in Biodiversity Policies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00452.xopenalex-snapshot
Exploring Farmers' Cultural Resistance to Voluntary Agri‐environmental Schemes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01276.xopenalex-snapshot
Auctions as a Means of Creating a Market for Public Goods from Agriculture
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00134.xopenalex-snapshot
Factors Affecting Farmers’ Participation in Agri‐environmental Measures: A Northern Italian Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00210.xopenalex-snapshot
Modelling Farmers’ Participation in an Agri‐environmental Scheme using Panel Data: An Application to the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00358.xopenalex-snapshot
Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in Payment‐for‐Environmental‐Services Programmes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01086.xopenalex-snapshot
A Revealed Preference Approach to Estimating Supply Curves for Ecosystem Services: Use of Auctions to Set Payments for Soil Erosion Control in Indonesia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00250.xopenalex-snapshot
Designing frameworks to deliver unknown information to support market‐based instruments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2009.01152.xopenalex-snapshot
Testing and Implementing the Use of Multiple Bidding Rounds in Conservation Auctions: A Case Study Application
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2010.01215.xopenalex-snapshot
A Reverse Auction for Wetland Restoration in the Assiniboine River Watershed, Saskatchewan
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/app.5.3.113openalex-snapshot
Private Information and the Allocation of Land Use Subsidies in Malawi
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1244139openalex-snapshot
Auctioning Conservation Contracts: A Theoretical Analysis and an Application
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2298088openalex-snapshot
Adverse Selection and Renegotiation in Procurement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3146870openalex-snapshot
Combining Spatial and Survey Data to Explain Participation in Agricultural Land reservation Programs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.39.supplement2.s23openalex-snapshot
Reverse Auctions for Agri-Environmental Improvements: Bid-Selection Rules and Pricing for Beneficial Management Practice Adoption
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3368/le.83.4.497openalex-snapshot
Assessing the Performance of Conservation Auctions: An Experimental Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3368/le.85.4.555openalex-snapshot
Competition-Based Environmental Policy: An Analysis of Farmland Preservation in Maryland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3368/le.88.4.658openalex-snapshot
Evaluating Conservation Auctions with Unknown Bidder Costs: The Scottish Fishing Vessel Decommissioning Program
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3368/le.89.3.387openalex-snapshot
Adverse Selection in Reverse Auctions for Ecosystem Services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3368/le.92.1.117openalex-snapshot
Multiple-Knapsack Optimization in Land Conservation: Results from the First Cost-effective Conservation Program in the United States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3368/le.92.2.256openalex-snapshot
Farmer Transaction Costs of Participating in Federal Conservation Programs: Magnitudes and Determinants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3368/le.92.2.273openalex-snapshot
Incentivizing and Tendering Conservation Contracts: The Trade-off between Participation and Effort Provision
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/w8060245openalex-snapshot
Role of Conservation Adoption Premiums on Participation in Water Quality Trading Programs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315240060-44openalex-snapshot
Transaction Costs of Policies to Reduce Agricultural Phosphorous Pollution in the Minnesota River
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5367/000000003101294217openalex-snapshot
Social Capital and Farmers' Willingness to Adopt Countryside Stewardship Schemes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.66752/1077-5315.3687openalex-snapshot
Using a BMP Auction as a Tool for the Implementation of Conservation Practices

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3287932openalex-extracted
Conservation Auctions, Collusion and the Endowment Effect
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4601099openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13240openalex-snapshot
Precision conservation: Linking set‐aside and working lands policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/ps.70524openalex-snapshot
Offering payments for omitting fungicides in winter wheat production: under which conditions is it economically interesting from the perspective of a farm? A case study from Luxembourg
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-022-00341-1openalex-snapshot
Optimizing contract allocation for risky conservation tenders
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00330-1openalex-snapshot
Performance of Agglomeration Bonuses in Conservation Auctions: Lessons from a Framed Field Experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00651-8openalex-snapshot
The Performance of a Repeated Discriminatory Price Auction for Ecosystem Services
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00935-1openalex-snapshot
Transaction Costs, Participation, and the Cost-Effectiveness of Reverse Auctions: Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01178-zopenalex-snapshot
Governance of working landscapes: a conceptual framework
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01728-wopenalex-snapshot
Opening the black box between governance and management: A mechanism-based explanation of how governance affects the management of endangered species
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesagr.2021.10.006openalex-snapshot
Experimental and behavioral economics to inform agri-environmental programs and policies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.005openalex-snapshot
Do outcome or input risks limit adoption of environmental projects: Rehabilitating gullies in Great Barrier Reef catchments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107271openalex-snapshot
Enhancing spatial coordination in payment for ecosystem services schemes with non-pecuniary preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108509openalex-snapshot
Conservation auctions for landscape-scale environmental management: Does spatial configuration matter for economic and ecological outcomes?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101647openalex-snapshot
Advancing ecosystem services auctions: Insights from an international Delphi panel
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113111openalex-snapshot
Adaptive co-management of environmental risks in result-based agreements for the provision of environmental services: A case study of the South of the Divide Conservation Action Program
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104979openalex-snapshot
Evaluating incentives to encourage native afforestation on private lands in Aotearoa–New Zealand
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105936openalex-snapshot
Spatial Coordination Incentives for landscape-scale environmental management: A systematic review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114851openalex-snapshot
Identifying innovation discourses for nitrogen management in the sugarcane sector in Great Barrier Reef catchments using Q-methodology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100228openalex-snapshot
Testing factors that enhance private participation in payments for ecosystem service programs targeting flood mitigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158534openalex-snapshot
Auctioning approaches for ecosystem services – Evidence and applications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-1564openalex-snapshot
Promoting Spatial Coordination in Flood Buyouts in the United States: Four Strategies and Four Challenges from the Economics of Land Preservation Literature
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2146310openalex-snapshot
Increasing uptake of improved land management practice to benefit environment and landholders: insights through a transaction cost lens
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/714601openalex-snapshot
Spatial Coordination and Joint Bidding in Conservation Auctions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/724032openalex-snapshot
A Framework for Evaluating Mechanisms to Support Seasonal Migratory Species
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbag015openalex-snapshot
Spatially coordinated conservation auctions under imperfect information about ecological spillovers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12442openalex-snapshot
Auctions for buying back groundwater for environmental purposes: Which design performs better?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12247openalex-snapshot
The influence of contract length on the performance of sequential conservation auctions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12397openalex-snapshot
Evaluating the tradeoff between cost effectiveness and participation in agricultural conservation programs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.70005openalex-snapshot
From rhetoric to measurement: The economics of wetland conservation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13729openalex-snapshot
Meta‐analysis of landowner participation in voluntary incentive programs for provision of forest ecosystem services
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12856openalex-snapshot
Increasing environmental outcomes with conservation tenders: The participation challenge
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12484openalex-snapshot
Key questions for conservation tenders as a means for delivering biodiversity benefits on private land
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3368/le.101.1.032824-0031ropenalex-snapshot
Effect of Information Disclosure Policies in Conservation Auctions: Role of Landscape Configuration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.838502openalex-snapshot
The Essential Role of Wetland Restoration Practitioners in the Science-Policy-Practice Process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/f12050578openalex-snapshot
Ecosystem Services Auctions: The Last Decade of Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4337/9781800379534.00011openalex-snapshot
Implementation of measures in the hinterland: transaction costs and economic instruments
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.