On the public citation graph

Access, Usage and Citation Metrics: What Function for Digital Libraries and Repositories in Research Evaluation?

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1088453
0 signed · 30 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20373openalex-extracted
Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20746openalex-extracted
Usage impact factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage‐based impact metrics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7openalex-extracted
Theory and practise of the g-index
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0146-5openalex-extracted
An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1722-zopenalex-extracted
Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0409-zopenalex-extracted
Open access scientometrics and the UK Research Assessment Exercise
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0145-9openalex-extracted
The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.10.004openalex-extracted
A rational indicator of scientific creativity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102openalex-extracted
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150openalex-extracted
What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1141753.1141821openalex-extracted
An architecture for the aggregation and analysis of scholarly usage data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/276675.276685openalex-extracted
CiteSeer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-7openalex-extracted
Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1214/lnms/1215461966openalex-extracted
Author Citation Index
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781775940openalex-extracted
Constructing experimental indicators for open access documents

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1425692openalex-extracted
Beyond Institutional Repositories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1506905openalex-extracted
Comparing Repository Types: Challenges and Barriers for Subject-Based Repositories, Research Repositories, National Repository Systems and Institutional Repositories in Serving Scholarly Communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23071openalex-snapshot
M endeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23286openalex-snapshot
Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of M endeley user categories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1053-9openalex-snapshot
Altmetrics for Research Outputs Measurement and Scholarly Information Management
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1053-9_5openalex-snapshot
New Dialog, New Services with Altmetrics: Lingnan University Library Experience
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0172-1openalex-snapshot
Comparison of citation and usage indicators: the case of oncology journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0183-yopenalex-snapshot
Indicators for a webometric ranking of open access repositories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1264-0openalex-snapshot
How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03189-7openalex-snapshot
Who reads international Egyptian academic articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley readership categories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-01-2020-0005openalex-snapshot
Unwrap citation count, Altmetric Attention Score and Mendeley readership status of highly cited articles in the top-tier LIS journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v14.n1.2021.31979openalex-snapshot
Análise da produção científica da Enfermagem e seus leitores no Mendeley
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0900-6.ch003openalex-snapshot
Beyond Institutional Repositories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/jdls.2010100104openalex-snapshot
Comparing Repository Types
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/jdls.2010102703openalex-snapshot
Beyond Institutional Repositories
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.