On the public citation graph
An Appraisal of the Rules of Treaty Interpretation in the ICJ Wall Opinion
0 signed · 12 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009186933.028openalex-extracted
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/e835openalex-extracted
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/e836openalex-extracted
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/187197308x311272openalex-extracted
Doing the Right Thing for the Right Reason – Why Dynamic or Static Approaches Should be Taken in the Interpretation of Treaties
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004480490_006openalex-extracted
A Few Reflections on the Interpretation of Treaties in Public International Law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.18356/96880a03-enopenalex-extracted
Report of the commission to the general assembly
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.