On the public citation graph
The 'New Science of Reading' is Pseudo-Science
0 signed · 6 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.14507/er.v0.600openalex-extracted
Language Development and Learning to Read: The Scientific Study of How Language Development Affects Reading Skill
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1336604openalex-extracted
The 3rsplus Technical Lexicon of Elementary School Subjects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1350464openalex-extracted
In the Days When Reading Instruction Was Not a Problem: Nellie Dale and the Dale Readers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1368925openalex-extracted
The Non-Impact of Reading First - Where to Go From Here
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-6001openalex-extracted
Early reading instruction: what science really tells us about how to teach reading
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2545.001.0001openalex-extracted
Early Reading Instruction
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.