On the public citation graph

Choice of Law in Federal Courts: From Erie and Klaxon to Cafa and Shady Grove

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1665092
0 signed · 21 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v28i3.517openalex-extracted
Wirtschaftspolitik und Statistik
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20h6svj.24openalex-extracted
FAKE ID
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208006openalex-extracted
Forthcoming articles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483300658.n79openalex-extracted
Concurring Opinions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674064935.c23openalex-extracted
Chapter Twenty-one. Common Law and Federal Common Law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-1447openalex-extracted
Aquatic Commons
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812291308.123openalex-extracted
9. No Exit: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg–Dissenting, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1786715openalex-extracted
Forum Shopping and the Evolution of Rules of Choice of Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2478953openalex-extracted
Separation of Powers and the Class Action
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3551192openalex-extracted
Erie Slapp Back
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-397045-9.00257-3openalex-snapshot
Violent Media Effects: Theory and Evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2015.05.004openalex-snapshot
Behavioral economics and the ‘new’ paternalism1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000147openalex-snapshot
Twenty-Five Years of Research on Violence in Digital Games and Aggression
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000164openalex-snapshot
Twenty-Five Years of Research on Violence in Digital Games and Aggression Revisited
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000185openalex-snapshot
Does Doing Media Violence Research Make One Aggressive?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/a0030597openalex-snapshot
Violent video games and the Supreme Court: Lessons for the scientific community in the wake of Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199380183.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Video Game Violence and Offline Aggression
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12182openalex-snapshot
Digital Games Research: A Survey Study on an Emerging Field and Its Prevalent Debates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117476openalex-snapshot
Social Identity Threat Motivates Science-Discrediting Online Comments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2014.17.4.553openalex-snapshot
Violent Video Games, Mass Shootings, and the Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2011.0321openalex-snapshot
A Plea for Concern Regarding Violent Video Games
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.