On the public citation graph
ICC, R2P, and the International Community’s Evolving Interventionist Toolkit
0 signed · 13 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-007-0017-3openalex-extracted
Punishing Genocidaires: A Deterrent Effect or Not?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004165717.i-0.80openalex-extracted
Between Incapacity and Indispensability: Th E United Nations and International Order in the 21St Century
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010921openalex-extracted
Book Review: Simon Chesterman (ed.), Civilians in War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publisher, 2001, 300 pp., £46.50 hbk., £16.95 pbk.)
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27412-1_7openalex-snapshot
Punishing or Preventing? The Responsibility to Protect and the Wars in South Sudan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-879-8_1openalex-snapshot
Where Does the Critique of International Human Rights Stand? An Exploration in 18 Vignettes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-675-8_1openalex-snapshot
Introduction—The ICC’s Failure to Effectively Address Non-cooperation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-675-8_4openalex-snapshot
Enhancing Responses to Non-cooperation Through the Responsibility to Protect
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137364401_3openalex-snapshot
The International Criminal Court and the Responsibility to Protect
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2015.37openalex-snapshot
Inhumanity’s law: Crimes against humanity, RtoP and South Sudan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2020.1740057openalex-snapshot
The ICC and R2P: Complementary or Contradictory?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12185openalex-snapshot
The Responsibility to Protect and the International Criminal Court: counteracting the crisis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2019.0066openalex-snapshot
Bombs, Trials, and Rights: Norm Complexity and the Evolution of Liberal Intervention Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7202/1025115aropenalex-snapshot
Cour pénale internationale et néocolonialisme : au-delà des évidences
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.