On the public citation graph

An Updated Perspective of the Hunch in Judicial Decision Making

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2009883
0 signed · 18 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0507openalex-extracted
Cognitive‐Experiential Self‐Theory of Personality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776018.ch4openalex-extracted
Utilitarianism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2003.04.001openalex-extracted
The role of emotion in decision-making: Evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0732-118x(01)00005-8openalex-extracted
A U-shaped model for the development of intuition by level of expertise
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511802058.001openalex-extracted
Introduction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.109openalex-extracted
Intuition: A social cognitive neuroscience approach.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.109.1.75openalex-extracted
Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.109.1.75openalex-extracted
Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016755openalex-extracted
Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2010.523874openalex-extracted
Misconceptions About Intuition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629openalex-extracted
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852openalex-extracted
A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2103745openalex-extracted
Philosophical Investigations.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3480175openalex-extracted
The Brandeis/Frankfurter Connection
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936370.00009openalex-extracted
Types of Intuition: Inferential and Holistic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936370.00011openalex-extracted
The Influence of Valence and Intensity of Affect on Intuitive Processing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511809590.004openalex-snapshot
Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.36315/2021inpact070openalex-snapshot
HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTION IN LAW: MAPPING LEGAL DECISIONS, COGNITIVE PROCESSES, AND AUTOMATION LEVELS
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.