On the public citation graph

An Experimental Study on the Effect of Ambiguity in a Coordination Game

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2066454
0 signed · 18 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800010316openalex-extracted
The foundations of statistics. By Leonard J. Savage, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1954, 294 pp
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1994.1071openalex-extracted
Nash Equilibrium under Knightian Uncertainty: Breaking Down Backward Induction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.0107openalex-extracted
Uncertainty Aversion and Preference for Randomisation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.0129openalex-extracted
Equilibrium in Beliefs under Uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-011-0649-zopenalex-extracted
Attitudes toward uncertainty and randomization: an experimental study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9284-6openalex-extracted
Kindness, confusion, or … ambiguity?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9053-3openalex-extracted
Granny Versus Game Theorist: Ambiguity in Experimental Games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9openalex-extracted
Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.01.002openalex-extracted
A dynamic Ellsberg urn experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2007.01.017openalex-extracted
Choice under uncertainty with the best and worst in mind: Neo-additive capacities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.02.001openalex-extracted
Ambiguity aversion in the long run: Repeated decisions under risk and uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011157509006openalex-extracted
Comparative Ignorance and the Ellsberg Paradox
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600866354openalex-extracted
Ambiguous games: Evidence for strategic ambiguity aversion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1761445openalex-extracted
A Variation on Ellsberg
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1884326openalex-extracted
Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms: Comment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2946693openalex-extracted
Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2951521openalex-extracted
A Simple Axiomatization of Nonadditive Expected Utility

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2320519openalex-extracted
Dragon Slaying and Dyke Building - How Does Ambiguity Affect Individual Behaviour?
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.