On the public citation graph
A Critical Study on How the Saudi Arbitration Code Could Be Improved and on Overcoming the Issues of Enforcing Foreign Awards in the Country as a Signatory State to the New York Convention
0 signed · 5 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0165070x0003148xopenalex-extracted
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4640956openalex-extracted
Improving Saudi Arabia’s Arbitration Climate: Comparative Study and Recommendations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-12-2016-0184openalex-snapshot
Party autonomy and justice in international commercial arbitration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24385/lincoln.24325984openalex-snapshot
The Effectiveness of Compulsory Arbitration in the Settlement of Disputed Marine Insurance Claims: A Case Study of Saudi Arabia
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.