On the public citation graph

The Generosity Effect: Fairness in Sharing Gains and Losses

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2322021
0 signed · 21 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01673533openalex-extracted
Tests of Fairness Models Based on Equity Considerations in a Three-Person Ultimatum Game
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4openalex-extracted
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7openalex-extracted
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(94)00071-lopenalex-extracted
On ultimatum bargaining experiments — A personal review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.017openalex-extracted
Sharing losses and sharing gains: Increased demand for fairness under adversity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.048openalex-extracted
Increased neural responses to unfairness in a loss context
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2003.10.009openalex-extracted
Behavioral Game Theory. Experiments in Strategic Interaction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-0984(05)13001-6openalex-extracted
Gain and Loss Ultimatums
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511803475.008openalex-extracted
Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511803475.019openalex-extracted
Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/467773openalex-extracted
Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects' Concepts of Distributive Justice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.7.3427openalex-extracted
Stakes Matter in Ultimatum Games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264097711-enopenalex-extracted
Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2011
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.286428openalex-extracted
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185openalex-extracted
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2937956openalex-extracted
Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/b:exec.0000026978.14316.74openalex-snapshot
Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-017-9514-7openalex-snapshot
A trust game in loss domain
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113946openalex-snapshot
Modulating the activity of vmPFC alters altruistic behavior: A tDCS study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2021.101785openalex-snapshot
Is Deception a Consequence of Emotion? Disposition, Mood, and Decision Frame.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/frbhe.2024.1238325openalex-snapshot
Norm focusing and losses—Evidence of ultimatum game experiments
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.