On the public citation graph

Transparency Arenas: A Framework

0 signed · 19 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17169-9openalex-extracted
The Tools of Government
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511510533openalex-extracted
Full Disclosure
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511558320openalex-extracted
The Theory of Institutional Design
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511558320.003openalex-extracted
Institutional Design and Rational Choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x0000492xopenalex-extracted
How States Utilize Foreign Evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520802689725openalex-extracted
Accountability Politics: Power and Voice in Rural Mexico
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199215362.001.0001openalex-extracted
The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382openalex-extracted
The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.xopenalex-extracted
Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.xopenalex-extracted
More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01508.xopenalex-extracted
Toward a New Era of Administrative Reform? The Myth of Post‐NPM in New Zealand
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12032openalex-extracted
Understanding the Complex Dynamics of Transparency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307075701openalex-extracted
Organizational barriers to transparency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003426806-5openalex-extracted
Street-Level Bureaucrats
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0002openalex-extracted
Varieties of Transparency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0007openalex-extracted
Dashed Expectations: Governmental Adaptation to Transparency Rules
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3767.001.0001openalex-extracted
Information Ecologies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06154-6openalex-snapshot
The Tools of Government in the Digital Age
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.04.003openalex-snapshot
China's limited push model of FOI legislation
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.