On the public citation graph

The Objective Measurement of World-Leading Research

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2564962
0 signed · 17 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0228-9openalex-extracted
Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1671-6openalex-extracted
Be known by the company you keep: Citations — quality or chance?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024208701874openalex-extracted
Publishing as Prostitution? – Choosing Between One's Own Ideas and Academic Success
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150openalex-extracted
What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026940openalex-extracted
THE CORRELATION BETWEEN CITATION COUNTS AND THE 1992 RESEARCH ASSESSMENT EXERCISE RATINGS FOR BRITISH LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00406openalex-extracted
The Determinants of Econometric Society Fellows Elections
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00542openalex-extracted
UK Economics and the Future Supply of Academic Economists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.xopenalex-extracted
A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments *
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00575.xopenalex-extracted
An Examination of the Reliability of Prestigious Scholarly Journals: Evidence and Implications for Decision‐Makers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322752539openalex-extracted
Evaluating Economics Research in Europe: An Introduction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831586openalex-extracted
Socrates in the Boardroom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1318857openalex-extracted
Comparing the Early Research Performance of Phd Graduates in Labor Economics in Europe and the USA
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.316699openalex-extracted
Publishing as Prostitution? Choosing between One's Own Ideas and Academic Failure
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.926029openalex-extracted
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1058497openalex-extracted
Scholarship, Citations and Salaries: Economic Rewards in Economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2007.5.2-3.271openalex-snapshot
Research and Higher Education in Economics: Can We Deliver the Lisbon Objectives?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0107openalex-snapshot
How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.