On the public citation graph

A Fresh Look at Jurors Questioning Witnesses: A Review of Eighth Circuit and Iowa Appellate Precedents and an Empirical Analysis of Federal and State Trial Judges and Trial Lawyers

0 signed · 6 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.1989.tb00278.xopenalex-extracted

“ROLE ORIENTATIONS OF STATE APPELLATE JUDGES: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SURVEY”

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3292.1994.tb01081.xopenalex-extracted

Question

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5018693openalex-extracted

Question 1: Atmosphere fractionation; Question 2: Baseball pressure

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.161.2.40-aopenalex-extracted

Sheep ID: double tagging derogation ends

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20h6svj.24openalex-extracted

FAKE ID

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n590openalex-extracted

Trial Heat Question

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.