On the public citation graph

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2830798

0 signed · 60 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960070404openalex-extracted
Subjective randomization in one‐and two‐person games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1030openalex-extracted
Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria: An Experimental Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.2001.2915openalex-extracted
Mixed Strategy Play and the Minimax Hypothesis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s001860400354openalex-extracted
Do we detect and exploit mixed strategy play by opponents?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-012-9203-zopenalex-extracted
Strategic adaptation of humans playing computer algorithms in a repeated constant-sum game
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)92814-gopenalex-extracted
Through a narrow window: working memory capacity and the detection of covariation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3openalex-extracted
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(94)90108-2openalex-extracted
Learning a mixed strategy equilibrium in the laboratory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8858(91)90029-iopenalex-extracted
The perception of randomness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.006openalex-extracted
The determinants of response time in a repeated constant-sum game: A robust Bayesian hierarchical dual-process model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.07.001openalex-extracted
Perception of randomness: On the time of streaks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.01.005openalex-extracted
Pattern recognition and subjective belief learning in a repeated constant-sum game
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.003openalex-extracted
Minimax play by teams
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2013.04.005openalex-extracted
Beyond fictitious play beliefs: Incorporating pattern recognition and similarity matching
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2014.05.007openalex-extracted
A generalized approach to belief learning in repeated games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2015.02.014openalex-extracted
Blind stealing: Experience and expertise in a mixed-strategy poker experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.09.036openalex-extracted
The efficiency of top agents: An analysis through service strategy in tennis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-8256(05)80020-xopenalex-extracted
Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01202-9openalex-extracted
Sequence learning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x11000653openalex-extracted
Probability theory and perception of randomness: Bridging “ought” and “is”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.1189openalex-extracted
Not that bad after all: Generation of random sequences.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.301openalex-extracted
Making sense of randomness: Implicit encoding as a basis for judgment.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.104.3.603openalex-extracted
Randomization in individual choice behavior.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.397openalex-extracted
Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlations.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.109.2.330openalex-extracted
The production and perception of randomness.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.25openalex-extracted
A Markov model for generation of random binary sequences.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1189openalex-extracted
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.62openalex-extracted
Can people behave "randomly?": The role of feedback.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.3.352openalex-extracted
Generation of random series in two-person strictly competitive games.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.3.278openalex-extracted
Through a narrow window: Sample size and the perception of correlation.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.392openalex-extracted
Distinguishing between random and nonrandom events.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.483openalex-extracted
Implicit learning of first-, second-, and third-order transition probabilities.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014821openalex-extracted
What's next? Judging sequences of binary events.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015241openalex-extracted
Perceptions of randomness: Why three heads are better than four.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036816openalex-extracted
Perception and identification of random events.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031322openalex-extracted
Belief in the law of small numbers.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000245openalex-extracted
Who “believes” in the Gambler’s Fallacy and why?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000462openalex-extracted
A re-examination of “bias” in human randomness perception.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.7.2106openalex-extracted
Nonmetric test of the minimax theory of two-person zerosum games.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.866205openalex-extracted
Does player specialization predict player actions? Evidence from penalty kicks at FIFA World Cup and UEFA Euro Cup
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00249openalex-extracted
Professionals Play Minimax
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00186openalex-extracted
On the Advantage of Serving First in a Tennis Set: Four Years at Wimbledon
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00316openalex-extracted
An Experimental Study of Belief Learning Using Elicited Beliefs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-9682.2008.00818.xopenalex-extracted
Experientia Docet: Professionals Play Minimax in Laboratory Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1112/plms.12030openalex-extracted
Power-free values of polynomials on symmetric varieties
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002506289648openalex-extracted
Penalty Kicks in Soccer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002516656729openalex-extracted
Further Field Evidence for Minimax Play
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344678openalex-extracted
Testing Mixed-Strategy Equilibria When Players Are Heterogeneous: The Case of Penalty Kicks in Soccer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024737openalex-extracted
One, Two, (Three), Infinity, … : Newspaper and Lab Beauty-Contest Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1521openalex-extracted
Minimax Play at Wimbledon
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1619openalex-extracted
Field Centipedes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v008.i18openalex-extracted
Evaluating Kolmogorov's Distribution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2502193openalex-extracted
Minimax on the Gridiron: Serial Correlation and Its Effects on Outcomes in the National Football League
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2850919openalex-extracted
Nash at Wimbledon: Evidence from Half a Million Serves
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.970416openalex-extracted
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2938300openalex-extracted
Testing the Minimax Hypothesis: A Re-Examination of O'Neill's Game Experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta7405openalex-extracted
What Happens in the Field Stays in the Field: Exploring Whether Professionals Play Minimax in Laboratory Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta7970openalex-extracted
Does Experience Teach? Professionals and Minimax Play in the Lab
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4284/sej.2010.76.3.791openalex-extracted
Pass or Run: An Empirical Test of the Matching Pennies Game Using Data from the National Football League
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035352623.00028openalex-extracted
Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Processes: The Discovered Preference Hypothesis
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.