On the public citation graph
Prospect Theory and the Corrective Approach: Policy Implications of Recent Developments in QALY Measurement
0 signed · 38 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1888openalex-extracted
How Affect Shapes Risky Choice: Distorted Probability Weighting Versus Probability Neglect
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1331openalex-extracted
Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility family
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3445openalex-extracted
Are Health State Valuations from the General Public Biased? A Test of Health State Reference Dependency Using Self‐assessed Health and an Efficient Discrete Choice Experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.688openalex-extracted
A new explanation for the difference between time trade‐off utilities and standard gamble utilities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9327-9_2openalex-extracted
Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0655-5openalex-extracted
When normative and descriptive diverge: how to bridge the difference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-011-0346-7openalex-extracted
Balancing equity and efficiency in the Dutch basic benefits package using the principle of proportional shortfall
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-7713-0openalex-extracted
Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-016-9234-yopenalex-extracted
Measuring Loss Aversion under Ambiguity: A Method to Make Prospect Theory Completely Observable
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.07.008openalex-extracted
Using rank data to estimate health state utility models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.10.004openalex-extracted
The correction of TTO-scores for utility curvature using a risk-free utility elicitation method
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.08.006openalex-extracted
Prospect theory in the health domain: A quantitative assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.04.002openalex-extracted
An elicitation of utility for quality of life under prospect theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6296(03)00023-7openalex-extracted
The internal consistency of the standard gamble: tests after adjusting for prospect theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139175197.009openalex-extracted
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300161124openalex-extracted
A COMPARISON OF STANDARD GAMBLE, TIME TRADE-OFF, AND ADJUSTED TIME TRADE-OFF SCORES
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/257678openalex-extracted
Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/261737openalex-extracted
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.00999.xopenalex-extracted
The Validity of QALYs under Non‐Expected Utility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00783.xopenalex-extracted
Discrete Choice Modeling for the Quantification of Health States: The Case of the EQ-5D
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x8200200407openalex-extracted
The Measurement of Patients' Values in Medicine
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x8400400307openalex-extracted
Preferences for Health Outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9401400110openalex-extracted
Utility Assessment in Cancer Patients
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9501500212openalex-extracted
Explaining Distortions in Utility Elicitation through the Rank-dependent Model for Risky Choices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9901900313openalex-extracted
Health Values and Prospect Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.2.332openalex-extracted
Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0647openalex-extracted
Resolving Inconsistencies in Utility Measurement Under Risk: Tests of Generalizations of Expected Utility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0711openalex-extracted
Loss Aversion Under Prospect Theory: A Parameter-Free Measurement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1131openalex-extracted
Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities When Probabilities Are Distorted or Unknown
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1498.10248openalex-extracted
Making Descriptive Use of Prospect Theory to Improve the Prescriptive Use of Expected Utility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185openalex-extracted
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3895openalex-snapshot
QALYs Without Bias? Non-Parametric Correction of Time Trade-Off and Standard Gamble Weights Based on Prospect Theory
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.